China to build aircraft carrier

wp2000

Member
Yep, the bet is still wide open:) till 2008.

Currently Varyag is being blocked by big tankers.

Jan, next year, we may see some progress


But,no matter what, I don't believe china will officially announce any thing about Varyag if it's for PLAN.
 

Jeff Head

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
wp2000 said:
Yep, the bet is still wide open:) till 2008.

Currently Varyag is being blocked by big tankers.

Jan, next year, we may see some progress


But,no matter what, I don't believe china will officially announce any thing about Varyag if it's for PLAN.
Agreed. We can but wait and keep watching for new aerial, shipyard, harbor or sat photos.
 

Crusader2000

Banned Member
wp2000 said:
Yep, the bet is still wide open:) till 2008.

Currently Varyag is being blocked by big tankers.

Jan, next year, we may see some progress


But,no matter what, I don't believe china will officially announce any thing about Varyag if it's for PLAN.

If, China does indeed return the Varyag back to service. How is she going to explain breaking a contract that clearly states that the she is not to be used for Military purposes????:smash
 

wp2000

Member
Crusader2000 said:
If, China does indeed return the Varyag back to service. How is she going to explain breaking a contract that clearly states that the she is not to be used for Military purposes????:smash
I have not seen any report that chinese GOVERNMENT has signed any contract relating to Varyag's usage.

Varyag was bought by a small company registered in HongKong (it might be established when a British governor was still ruling HongKong).

IF that company has signed any such kind of contract AND Varyag is not used as a casino in Macau, I guess China wouldn't mind if any one can find the owner of that company. That guy disappearred right after Varyag was bought. Dalian Shipyard must have a huge bill for him to pay.:xmas

Also, as far as I know, evenif it's refitted and given to PLAN, it won't be a comat ship. I won't be surprised if China calls it something like long rang heavy peace loving ship, just like Japan's 13000ton light heli frigat.:)

As I said, this contract thing, if there is one, would have been solved before Varyag was towed away from Ukrane years ago.
 
Last edited:

ajaybhutani

New Member
wp2000 said:
I have not seen any report that chinese GOVERNMENT has signed any contract relating to Varyag's usage.

Varyag was bought by a small company registered in HongKong (it might be established when a British governor was still ruling HongKong).

IF that company has signed any such kind of contract AND Varyag is not used as a casino in Macau, I guess China wouldn't mind if any one can find the owner of that company. That guy disappearred right after Varyag was bought. Dalian Shipyard must have a huge bill for him to pay.:xmas

Also, as far as I know, evenif it's refitted and given to PLAN, it won't be a comat ship. I won't be surprised if China calls it something like long rang heavy peace loving ship, just like Japan's 13000ton light heli frigat.:)

As I said, this contract thing, if there is one, would have been solved before Varyag was towed away from Ukrane years ago.
china has a track record of not taking patents, rules, intellectual property rights sireously. Do u really think they will abide by any such aggrements signed with a small country.. while they dont evern respect aggrements with russia.
 

Crusader2000

Banned Member
ajaybhutani said:
china has a track record of not taking patents, rules, intellectual property rights sireously. Do u really think they will abide by any such aggrements signed with a small country.. while they dont evern respect aggrements with russia.
True but it still could hurt future contracts! Many in Europe would love to see the arms embargo lifted. Yet, who can trust China to its word?:(
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
ajaybhutani said:
china has a track record of not taking patents, rules, intellectual property rights sireously. Do u really think they will abide by any such aggrements signed with a small country.. while they dont evern respect aggrements with russia.
It's getting better at it. Most of these defensive contract infringement was done in the pre-80s days. China is having licensed productions these days and paying for them.
 

Jeff Head

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Crusader2000 said:
If, China does indeed return the Varyag back to service. How is she going to explain breaking a contract that clearly states that the she is not to be used for Military purposes????:smash
Easily. The holding company that signed that contract, as I ubderstand it, went bankrupt and is now defunct, The PLAN has taken possession of the vessel and is not contractually bound to fulfill those obligations.
 

tonbo

New Member
thot Lee Kashing* was the one who bought it and gave it to the Chinese government as a gift after re-unification of HK & mainland [ heresay amongst street-folks ; i personally heard that bit frm a friend who's been into Chinese defence stuff , tho more for scale-modelling sake than anything else ] ...

no matter , since it wasn't the Chinese government that bought the vessel or signed the contract proper ( tho i believe they did haggle with the various foreign authorities for various vessels before sentiments toward the Chinese warmed ) , they in fact have no need to bother whether or not the Varyag just lay in ruins . so far they seem to have done a good job of cleaning it up and even restoring / completing the unfinished main superstructure ...

a simple case of '' ... not letting anything go to waste '' perhaps

* edit - not meant to defame Mr Lee (heresay , heresay ...)
 
Last edited:

tonbo

New Member
addendum ... abt contracts on paper

in history China was the first to use paper , so you would at least expect it to follow what's written on it these days .

so lets not confuse hoodlum & corrupt officials who are out for a quick buck and the Beijing Government proper , shall we . i personally despise those who rip DVDs and software etc... but that's going off-topic somewhat . laters ~

p.s - i do understand that all private sector ventures regarding the carriers could well have been China's way of going around the official stance that the Russians and Ukranians had adopted against them at the time ^^;
 
Last edited:

Crusader2000

Banned Member
tonbo said:
thot Lee Kashing* was the one who bought it and gave it to the Chinese government as a gift after re-unification of HK & mainland [ heresay amongst street-folks ; i personally heard that bit frm a friend who's been into Chinese defence stuff , tho more for scale-modelling sake than anything else ] ...

no matter , since it wasn't the Chinese government that bought the vessel or signed the contract proper ( tho i believe they did haggle with the various foreign authorities for various vessels before sentiments toward the Chinese warmed ) , they in fact have no need to bother whether or not the Varyag just lay in ruins . so far they seem to have done a good job of cleaning it up and even restoring / completing the unfinished main superstructure ...

a simple case of '' ... not letting anything go to waste '' perhaps

* edit - not meant to defame Mr Lee (heresay , heresay ...)

So, set up a dummy company and when it goes under. You get the ship with no strings.........................:fly
 

wp2000

Member
Crusader2000 said:
True but it still could hurt future contracts! Many in Europe would love to see the arms embargo lifted. Yet, who can trust China to its word?:(
But, you are assuming that all the parties involved are innocent except chinese. I believe it's all well arranged before China started to tow it back from Ukrane.

Also about those so called license breaking behaviours, especially military ones, have you noticed that at least most of those IP owners never seriously and loudly complained about this, not to mention taking any concrete actions. Why?
 
Last edited:

wp2000

Member
Crusader2000 said:
So, set up a dummy company and when it goes under. You get the ship with no strings.........................:fly
It's a common way though. I don't believe china invented this method.

Also, strings were paid to be removed, not a simple "no strings". You know, for example, about the demolition of the power system, how to destruct something has huge room for negotiation to make everybody happy.
 
Last edited:

zoolander

New Member
PLAN future carrier? crusier?

There has been reports that the PLAN will make the Varieg operational but reports has it that the super strucuture has been damaged beyond repair. They has also been reports that PLAN is planing to buy Ukrainin cruiser. Any one know anything about this. Also disguss the future PLAN ddgs and the type 54a ffg
 

zoolander

New Member
I heard the Varyag's superstructure initial superstructure was "blown up" by the Ukrainians before they transfered it to the Chinese. Is this true?
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
zoolander said:
I heard the Varyag's superstructure initial superstructure was "blown up" by the Ukrainians before they transfered it to the Chinese. Is this true?
Untrue. The Varyag was stripped of all warfighting equipment and communications systems.

Structurally she was relatively intact - no equipment was deliberately rendered inop. What was inop was primarily due to being abandoned at the maint level by the Russians.
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
zoolander said:
There has been reports that the PLAN will make the Varieg operational but reports has it that the super strucuture has been damaged beyond repair. They has also been reports that PLAN is planing to buy Ukrainin cruiser. Any one know anything about this. Also disguss the future PLAN ddgs and the type 54a ffg
Are you talking about the Ukrina? It's been mentionned that PLAN might be interested in it, but I think Slava is probably not what would be the best option for PLAN. In fact, China has its own version of mini-Slava in 051C. If anything, getting a couple of Udaloy would be a lot more useful in giving China some real ASW capabilities. As for 054A, a lot of news and not much actions are going on. 052C is going through a lot of sea trials and sorting out the problems that would exist with any new combat systems. The recent rush in new DDGs might extinguish for a couple of years after 051Cs are commissionned. The primary DDG shipyard in China is getting relocated.
 

mark22w

New Member
I understood work on the Varyag stopped at 70% in 1991 with approx $500m remaining to complete fit out. Having transferred to the Ukraine it had its engines, rudders and other hardware removed by ‘scrap merchants’ before its protracted sale and move to China.

This hull is approx 20 years old (laid down during the 80’s) and has been neglected. I expect the PLAN has its work cut out to deliver it as an operational platform anytime before 2010 and even then would see it more as a trials platform or template for a future home grown carrier.

Impressive platform for showing the flag in the meantime…
 

zoolander

New Member
i am refering to the slava class. How much will it cost and will it include the shipwreck missiles. And are the 54a ffgs gonna have vertically hotlauched sam instead of the regular slanted rotating one
 
Top