Latest activity
-
John Fedup replied to the thread 6th Generation Fighters Projects.Boeing and LM subcontractors, who is responsible for choosing them? The DoW? The F/A XX award going to Boeing which has the F-47 award... -
If your using F35’s current issues against it why don’t you hold Boeing by the same standard? As they put in investment ads Past... -
Ssouth reacted to Sandson41's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
Someone here may be able to correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding (from posts on this forum, IIRC) is that the LHDs are not... -
Terran replied to the thread 6th Generation Fighters Projects.If your using F35’s current issues against it why don’t you hold Boeing by the same standard? As they put in investment ads Past... -
Feanor replied to the thread Russian Army/Ground Forces Discussion and Updates.Center-2026 has just shown us some interesting things. First off the exercise seems to be much closer to the reality of war in Ukraine... -
John Fedup replied to the thread 6th Generation Fighters Projects.Given LM’s crap performance on upgrades, the F-35 exports past 2050 are bleak IMHO. The ECU for the F135 engine does nothing for range...
-
Kkoxinga replied to the thread 6th Generation Fighters Projects.It is one reason for Singapore to have informal, exploratory talks with the Tempest consortium. The current strategy seems to be...
-
John Fedup replied to the thread 6th Generation Fighters Projects.A fair article by Bill Sweetman explaining the thinking behind the Boeing win wrt the F/A XX. One interesting point was on exports. If...
-
SWhat is your methodology based on ? P : P estimates/rates of advance ? QJM ? RAND ? TNDM ? UKR casualties are in the same area as...
-
Takao reacted to spoz's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
For “Navy” in the comment about relative budgets, you could substitute “Submarines”. As noted by others, the rest of the Navy is... -
Takao reacted to south's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
I’m not sure that anyone is dummy spitting - as outlined by @Takao, there’s been support in the past. In fact, I’d be surprised if...
-
Takao reacted to iambuzzard's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Which is why Defence need to apply the rule of three. Two hulls has never been enough. Plus, I think the RAAF need to stop the dummy...
-
Takao reacted to StingrayOZ's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Wasn't that part of the mission that the Japanese were using the previous class of ships for. Although these days I presume its less...
-
Takao reacted to Stampede's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
I think the quote from the Defence minister back when the Canberras were ordered and Navy’s firm push for a third ship was suggested was...
-
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.I’m sceptical as to whether this aircraft could operate off the Canberra class, but I’d be happy to be proved wrong. I’m still keeping...