I have to wonder what is the Command Intent in Mirnograd.
Is it just to get Ukrainians soldiers killed so they can kill Russians soldiers? Is that going to be the 2025 Ukrainian offensive?
The first point would be knowing how many soldiers Ukraine has in town (we already know that Russia has 150.000 in the area) and why they didn't pull back to Pokrovsk. Then, we have those counterattacks in Szatishok. Is Ukraine going to attack south, towards Chervonii Liman to open a corridor to Mirnograd? Ukraine has to take the mine complex first, there are also 3 mounds in the area. Looking at the limited counterattacks we can see that Ukraine doesn't have enough troops for that operation. Even then, the whole eastern flank would be the front line, that would imply a retreat under fire; no to mention the western flank, Russia is advancing towards Grishine now.
Is there any actual Intent or is it just a case of keep holding... forever, to everything. Because Ukraine's High Command can see that it is not holding, it is slowly retreating wherever Russia decides (lately) to attack, to exert enough pressure. (Hitler was fond of declaring "fortresses"; in Vietnam, they had the Strategic Hamlets)
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ukraine’s president, said he was not opposed to withdrawing amid the "very difficult" situation in Pokrovsk but it was a decision for commanders on the ground. "No one is forcing them to die for the sake of ruins. I will support our soldiers, especially the commanders who are there, in how they can control the situation, or it’s too expensive for us. The most important thing for us is our soldiers."
President suggests leaders on the ground will decide whether holding city is costing too many lives; Kyiv apartments hit in ‘massive’ attack. What we know on day 1,360
www.theguardian.com
NYT calls it a dilemma.
Higher echelons should be planning for what is going to happen in 15 days, in 3 months. Holding out the next day doesn't sound like a plan.
Does Ukraine have resources to plan?