Russia - General Discussion.

swerve

Super Moderator
Looking more into it, with real GDP/capita in Russia being 5 times less than that in the US, Russia has about quarter of the roads that the Americans have (and about 1.5 times more kilometres than we do in Canada). The United States has more than 10 times the population density of Russia though (and ~2.5? times population of Russia) and much more favourable average climate conditions.
USA - 37 per km2
Russia - 8.6 per km2

4.3 times, not more than 10 times.

Here is something many would not likely expect though: 71% of Russian roads are paved. No country with even remotely similar climate is ahead or close. Canada sits at 40% and the United States at 65%. Finland? Well, Finland paved 20% of their road network.
You ignore an important factor: roads in proportion to population.

People per km of paved road/total roads (the fewer the better)
Russia: 130/92
USA: 79/52
Canada: 100/40
Finland: 72/12

So, in proportion to population, all these countries have more paved roads. Russia has a higher proportion of paved roads (& to what standard?) merely because it has less road per person. It has more people per km of roads in total than Finland or the USA have for paved roads, let alone all roads, & I suspect the average quality of paved roads is higher in Finland, though my personal comparison (far better in Finland, including rural areas) was in the days of the USSR, so I can't say for sure. Google street map suggests my comparison could still be valid, though.

Canada has roughly half the population density of Russia, BTW.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
USA - 37 per km2
Russia - 8.6 per km2

4.3 times, not more than 10 times.


You ignore an important factor: roads in proportion to population.

People per km of paved road/total roads (the fewer the better)
Russia: 130/92
USA: 79/52
Canada: 100/40
Finland: 72/12

So, in proportion to population, all these countries have more paved roads. Russia has a higher proportion of paved roads (& to what standard?) merely because it has less road per person. It has more people per km of roads in total than Finland or the USA have for paved roads, let alone all roads, & I suspect the average quality of paved roads is higher in Finland, though my personal comparison (far better in Finland, including rural areas) was in the days of the USSR, so I can't say for sure. Google street map suggests my comparison could still be valid, though.

Canada has roughly half the population density of Russia, BTW.
I think even this data is somewhat misleading. A country with more suburbs and a more spread out population will have fewer people per km of road, vs a country with more traditional dense urban cores. Additionally the level of urbanization will factor heavily in this. And I don't know that America's endless paved suburbs are a good thing all things considered. There's much to suggest they're financially unsustainable, problematic from an infrastructure standpoint, and contribute to some problems in society. I think a true comparison would have to account for population density not on a national scale, but on some sort of formula related to total road availability to get a true comparison, if such a thing is even possible when we're talking about things as large and as different as Russia, Canada, and the USA.
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
^ I would bet on the former (but I am not even remotely close to having an expert opinion). Looks to me like an attempt to intercept a drone that is way too close for such an endeavour.

Also, while people keep talking nonsense, there is a lot going on behind the scenes and I have no idea why Russia does not capitalize on the discussion.

IMG_5518.jpeg

IMG_5515.jpeg

IMG_5508.jpeg

And so on.

As far the explosion itself is concerned, I would suggest reading on “modern” storage tank construction and why I said I was puzzled how a drone impact could have caused such a damage.
 

personaldesas

Active Member
As far the explosion itself is concerned, I would suggest reading on “modern” storage tank construction and why I said I was puzzled how a drone impact could have caused such a damage.
I had a similar impression from the scale of the damages overall. It makes me wonder whether, in this case, the cure may have been worse than the disease, i.e. that some significant part of the damages was caused not by the drones itself, but by firing missiles at low altitude with insufficient accuracy around a refinery full of highly flammable materials.
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
I had a similar impression from the scale of the damages overall. It makes me wonder whether, in this case, the cure may have been worse than the disease, i.e. that some significant part of the damages was caused not by the drones itself, but by firing missiles at low altitude with insufficient accuracy around a refinery full of highly flammable materials.
Just to follow up. Russian MoD reported that Ukraine used 992 drones and 4 cruise missiles. Some Ukrainian sources report the same number of drones and 10 “mini cruise missiles” in Moscow attack. An incredible number. The cure cannot be worse than the disease, I would think. How many targets were intercepted (or “lost”? 950? 970? 990? Out of approximately 1,000? I mean Kyiv looks worse than that almost every time it is attacked (there are no fuel tanks left for visual effects), and that is provided all the advertised “ingenuity” and “knowhow”. Out of curiosity, I looked but couldn’t find how many drones had attacked Kyiv simultaneously. The most I found is 600 drones and 90 missiles they say targeted Kyiv, but I am 99% sure it is all of Ukraine, not just Kyiv. Multiple Geran slamming into targets is normal though. A recent example from Kharkiv (the second link Google search provided), multiple explosions had already taken place (at least two) and 4 more hit what appears to be the same target:


So yeah, while the cure is not perfect, it is most certainly significantly better than we are led to believe. Imagine what the Middle East looked like if Iran could sustain these numbers for the period that the war lasted.

Propagandist’s “BDA” (aka, things that didn’t happen (I am amazed people still take this guy seriously after years of “reporting”)):

IMG_5553.jpeg


Also interesting and general thread related:

IMG_5523.jpeg

Like I mentioned in the Middle East thread a while back, here prices went from 1.10 CAD per litre on February 27 to 1.90 just a few weeks ago. Still at 1.70 at most gas stations or, in other words, prices have increased 55% since end of February (to today, over 70% to May). I am not saying there are no issues, but people need to calm down and look at it with a realistic outlook.


Another garbage take and things that didn’t happen for the general thread. The poster is talking about the Moscow strike.

IMG_5534.jpeg

Not a single remark I heard in any of the videos was in Arabic. And what the hell does “other Muslim-majority languages” even mean? These people are idiots. For fun (and to make a point), I googled for the refinery location, opened the map and looked around. Low and behold, I didn’t have to look far at all.

IMG_5556.jpeg

The storage part of the refinery is to the left of the middle. North is more refinery infrastructure and other industrial stuff. To the right of the middle, where that blue symbol is, is… bazaar, a market, and a giant one, called Sadovod (means gardner). This is where most of the videos came from. So I went back to the browser and searched for Sadovod. It told me that it is the largest wholesale and retail market in Russia. Laughing. I wonder who one is most likely to meet at such a place in Russia? I would bet my last it would be representatives of those “other Muslim-majority languages”, which include folks from Azerbaijan, Tadzhikistan, Turkmenistan, and other -tans.

Funny enough, the low-iq influencer is also a racist. His post makes it clear. And is as dumb as the proponents of the Russia defenders of “white Christian values” or whatever it is he says.

Anyway, for clarity, there are no “white Christian values” and I don’t know who came up with it. Russia has more muslims than any other country in Europe and I would guess in top… five in the world among the non-muslim majority countries. Absolute majority of them identify as Russians (as in Rossiyane, an equivalent of Canadian or American) as they have been living in Russia for centuries. They are also called orcs, vatniks, etc - ie Russians when they fight snd die on the battlefield - by the same influencers. The rest came from the post-Soviet -tans, looking for better life, work, trade (sell produce and fruit, for instance), etc. Also, among these “other Muslim-majority languages”, an idiot may hear Armenian or Georgian as well, for example, but not recognize them as such - they would not be as common either. In this case I say an idiot not because lack of recognition of “other Christian languages (?)”, but due to sweeping up all languages that are not Russian into the same pile. Another fun fact: all the languages he heard are not of the Arabic origin, but Turkish (an “original” of which one would undoubtedly hear at the same market). He should be thankful he didn’t hear any Chinese or his head would explode while coming up with the nonsense to post for lemming consumption.
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
I saw the clip without realising what I was watching , my first thought (very brief) was a flying saucer!
It provided a “very cool” visual, no doubt (I would nominate it to be one if the best in this war, for sure). But it also did what it was intended to do in an (normally highly unlikely) event of explosion, by design.
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
USA - 37 per km2
Russia - 8.6 per km2

4.3 times, not more than 10 times.


You ignore an important factor: roads in proportion to population.

People per km of paved road/total roads (the fewer the better)
Russia: 130/92
USA: 79/52
Canada: 100/40
Finland: 72/12

So, in proportion to population, all these countries have more paved roads. Russia has a higher proportion of paved roads (& to what standard?) merely because it has less road per person. It has more people per km of roads in total than Finland or the USA have for paved roads, let alone all roads, & I suspect the average quality of paved roads is higher in Finland, though my personal comparison (far better in Finland, including rural areas) was in the days of the USSR, so I can't say for sure. Google street map suggests my comparison could still be valid, though.

Canada has roughly half the population density of Russia, BTW.
I thought I replied to this. Hmm… Sorry, swerve. I will do so again, but not today.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Anyway, for clarity, there are no “white Christian values” and I don’t know who came up with it. Russia has more muslims than any other country in Europe and I would guess in top… five in the world among the non-muslim majority countries.
That looks like a good guess. Fifth after India (by far the leader), China, Ethiopia & Tanzania, according to online sources in general.
 

KipPotapych

Well-Known Member
That looks like a good guess. Fifth after India (by far the leader), China, Ethiopia & Tanzania, according to online sources in general.
Ha! Close call. Didn’t think of Tanzania at all. Nigeria is probably cutting in somewhere there as well (unless it is a Muslim-majority country now). At the time of writing, I thought it would be in fourth place, so I thought it would be a safe bet, turns out it is closer to 50-50 (laughing) and I may actually be losing here.

Edit: looked it up just because and the results are (Muslim population and percentage of the total population, both rounded to the nearest integer):
1. India: 200M and 15%
2. Nigeria: 98M and 48%
3. Ethiopia: 35M and 31%
4. China: 28M and 2%
5. Tanzania: 19M and 35%
6. Russia: 15M and 11%
7. Ivory Coast: 11M and 43%

The data was taken from here: Muslim Population by Country 2026

To note, according to the Religious Administration of Muslims of Russia, there are just over 20M Muslims living in Russia. Wikipedia says that according the US State Department, there were 14M Muslims in Russia in 2017. There are some place suggesting 25M, but I do not see where their numbers are coming from. Some Islam-promotion sites claim 110-115M Muslims in Nigeria, making up to 55% of the country’s population. Pending these uncertainties, it could be number 4, 5, or 6. Not that any of it matters, but now we know, somewhat.

The Islam-promotion sites and “Muslim leaders” (in my view, “I don’t believe you” gif may be in order) claim 2-3.5M Muslims living in Moscow, absolute majority being migrant workers from the post-Soviet space. What’s the population of Moscow? 13-15M? Most certainly not like “somewhere like Tehran”.
 
Last edited:

rsemmes

Active Member
Should Russia start threatening Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania? And every satellite in space in general?
We seem quite happy with Zelenski doing just that.

Kyiv will otherwise intervene itself to halt the transmissions.
Belarus is one of the key suppliers for the Russian army. He is saying that Putin should attack/threaten those supplying Ukraine, right?
Or against one of the NATO countries. Thank you for your heads up, but that would be only fair, right?
Moscow is planning a "massive strike" against Ukraine. He is bragging about his "massive strike", that would be only fair, right?

“But when I started to be threatened, I had to answer,” Lukashenko said. Or not, and just wait for us to tell you when you have been threatened.
 

personaldesas

Active Member
Should Russia start threatening Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania? And every satellite in space in general?
We seem quite happy with Zelenski doing just that.

Kyiv will otherwise intervene itself to halt the transmissions.
Belarus is one of the key suppliers for the Russian army. He is saying that Putin should attack/threaten those supplying Ukraine, right?
Or against one of the NATO countries. Thank you for your heads up, but that would be only fair, right?
Moscow is planning a "massive strike" against Ukraine. He is bragging about his "massive strike", that would be only fair, right?

“But when I started to be threatened, I had to answer,” Lukashenko said. Or not, and just wait for us to tell you when you have been threatened.
They've already been doing that:
Putin said:
We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against the military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities
 
Last edited:
Top