Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
The later the decision the more its suits the Japanese. I think I read that TKMS needs the decision to happen this year if it is to deliver its first ship by 2029.


Actually I can see a case for both ships winning. A fully Australianised MEKO A-200 could be the transition vessel while the Mogami would be the one we actually build in Australia.
Only sort of makes sense if MEKOs can arrive within 2 years…a stretch I think? Even then, a lot of negative vibes.
 

Stampede

Well-Known Member
Only sort of makes sense if MEKOs can arrive within 2 years…a stretch I think? Even then, a lot of negative vibes.
Yes the timing is important

The Hobart Class will shortly start their refit and the ANZACs are down to seven with more to be decommissioned.

I wonder what the government priorities are re the selection of SEA3000

Time to service or the attributes of the contending ships.

Not sure I have confidence in a German build for meeting our timeframe.

Cheers S
 

seaspear

Well-Known Member
If timeline is important in the delivery of these ships can there be an argument for both of these types of ships to be included in the fleet assuming both of them are equal in contribution to what they bring to the fleet , logistics might be addressed by having them assigned to the different basses East and West
 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Actually I can see a case for both ships winning. A fully Australianised MEKO A-200 could be the transition vessel while the Mogami would be the one we actually build in Australia.
There are possibilities. Other nations are looking at something like this. Both Germany and Japan are looking at sales either way to perhaps allied smaller nations. Particularly if things continue to get worse. Having this project get to develop, spec, design, schedule and maybe even start construction is a good thing. There is no loser in this. Sales will happen I am sure. This kind of project is allowing industry to build for a future increase in production and capabilities.

NZ, various SEA nations, some in the middle east, some of those in NATO. Low manning, high capability frigates with endurance are always a good idea. Maybe some of these would even be fitted with Australian radars and combat systems if sold to other nations.
 

Stampede

Well-Known Member
This abc article suggests some in defence think MEKO will be easier to integrate into the RAN.

Thanks just read the article.
No doubt the Meko200 is a well established design
Looked up the Egyptian Meko as a reference for what base model the RAN may receive
At a similar size to our current ANZACs the Japanese offering is really a different size of warship to the point of not being comparing apples for apples
As a future class taking us out to 2060s do we want such a small ship?

I think not

Cheers S
 

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
Thanks just read the article.
No doubt the Meko200 is a well established design
Looked up the Egyptian Meko as a reference for what base model the RAN may receive
At a similar size to our current ANZACs the Japanese offering is really a different size of warship to the point of not being comparing apples for apples
As a future class taking us out to 2060s do we want such a small ship?

I think not

Cheers S
You're correct, it's packed to the gills already. The Evolved Mogami looks like it has room to add VLS, extra Close In Weapons and Directed Energy Weapons. Meko200 is full.
 

Reptilia

Well-Known Member
Thanks just read the article.
No doubt the Meko200 is a well established design
Looked up the Egyptian Meko as a reference for what base model the RAN may receive
At a similar size to our current ANZACs the Japanese offering is really a different size of warship to the point of not being comparing apples for apples
As a future class taking us out to 2060s do we want such a small ship?

I think not

Cheers S
Agree. Just look at potential future upgrades and enhancements onto the Mogami platforms. DEWs, Rail guns and long range anti ship missiles.…USVs and UUVs also being constantly updated.



 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
The German ships have quite a different fit out, arguably there is more commonality with existing RAN stuff with Mogami, although that is pure opinion and fairly uninformed at that. The 210 is still quite early on in the build design process and has significant risk, I believe it was eliminated. It doesn't matter, I don't think the ships designs are central to the selection of either ship. Build, risk, cost, delivery and manpower are way, way more important.

The germans have done this before. But that experience was a while ago at different yards. I'm not sure if the previous experience is that relevant, but it doesn't hurt their offer.

I hope in hearing chatter, that means a decision is imminent. I don't even care what is selected, this project needs to get going and committed to in full. Selection of the platform will have impact on munitions, drones, training pipelines and also the actual production of ships and the preparing locally for their construction.
 

iambuzzard

Well-Known Member
200 Anzac - 118m -3600t
A200 - 121m -3700t
A210 - 127m -4700t

Upgraded Mogami - 142m -6200t clearly has more room to grow.


Decision before Christmas = December no doubt.
You're right Reptilia. The Evolved Mogami has room to significantly increase it's firepower. As you guys have so often said, steel is cheap. With that extra space the weapon load could be upgraded quite easily. No need to try to fit a destroyer's capability into a corvette.
 

ADMk2

Just a bloke
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
The German ships have quite a different fit out, arguably there is more commonality with existing RAN stuff with Mogami, although that is pure opinion and fairly uninformed at that. The 210 is still quite early on in the build design process and has significant risk, I believe it was eliminated. It doesn't matter, I don't think the ships designs are central to the selection of either ship. Build, risk, cost, delivery and manpower are way, way more important.

The germans have done this before. But that experience was a while ago at different yards. I'm not sure if the previous experience is that relevant, but it doesn't hurt their offer.

I hope in hearing chatter, that means a decision is imminent. I don't even care what is selected, this project needs to get going and committed to in full. Selection of the platform will have impact on munitions, drones, training pipelines and also the actual production of ships and the preparing locally for their construction.
The bids are due to be delivered in full to the ADF by July 2025, so I expect this current chatter is the start of the “ramping up” process for this project.

ADF have been given til November from memory to assess the bids and make a recommendation to Government.

Hence the “argy bargy” between Government and CASG over whether it will be 2025 or 2026…

You can see the DoD’s predicament, after all these years / decades to the contrary, suddenly being called upon to do capability acquisition quickly and efficiently…
 

Todjaeger

Potstirrer
You can see the DoD’s predicament, after all these years / decades to the contrary, suddenly being called upon to do capability acquisition quickly and efficiently…
Particularly when the ADF or respective services have made recommendations to gov't, which were then overridden, ignored or dismissed by gov't in favour selecting the competing kit, usually for 'reasons'. The selection of what is now the Hobart-class DDG, as well as the selection of the MRH-90 Taipan being two examples which spring to mind...
 

Bob53

Well-Known Member
Particularly when the ADF or respective services have made recommendations to gov't, which were then overridden, ignored or dismissed by gov't in favour selecting the competing kit, usually for 'reasons'. The selection of what is now the Hobart-class DDG, as well as the selection of the MRH-90 Taipan being two examples which spring to mind...
What did defence want instead of Hobart? What was the pressing reason Hobart were chosen?
 
Top