the implications around this are enormous. interesting to note that its been cofunded by SOCOM - I'm assuming that this was picked up on one of the US visits that are run every year when the USN USAF USMC, US Army,. State Dept, Dept Commerce and NAVSEA visit Australia to look at the top 24 CTD's
'Pharmacological tourniquet' developed by Australian scientists to save soldiers, remote patients - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
I am not sure if this is the same thing I have heard of but there is a type of medical foam which is administered via injection, which is being trialed to control internal hemorrhaging.
As for some of the other battlefield medical advances, a number of them do or have made their way into civilian emergency medicine in the US, while others, not so much...
Tourniquets, which for a long time had been removed from protocols, have been added back in as a result of military experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan. This turned out to be fortunate IMO because I suspect many of the traumatic amputation victims from the bombing of the Boston Marathon in 2014 would likely have perished had tourniquets, even improvised ones, not been applied.
However some of the clotting agents (Quikclot, Celox, and others) which have entered the marketplace for laypeople to purchase are still not in protocols for use by EMS personnel. So far the various state organizations which control what is required and permitted, as well as the doctors and hospitals providing medical control, have refused to permit the use, even for uncontrollable hemorrhaging. In a way it is kind of funny, since I personally know some of the people cleared by the manufacturers to train combat medics to use the stuff, and one of the companies is located not too far from me. Apparently the manufacturer has offered to provide the clotting agent to local ambulance services for free, but has not even been able to give it away, since currently EMT's are only allowed to use it on themselves.
As for the internal damage and hemorrhaging which occurs as a result of blast damage, there is a term for that which is, "the butterfly of death." The term coming from Israel IIRC and referrs to a pattern which commonly was showing up in bombing victims who had been injured by the pressure wave, but initially felt fine so did not seek immediate treatment. What would typically happen in such instances is that the "uninjured" victims would get released from the scene and go about their business and usually within an hour or two would start to have problems and go/get taken to the hospital. Once there, diagnostic imaging would show blot patterns resembling a butterfly which was the soft tissue damage, ruptured internal organs and blood collecting internally. AFAIK by the time the 'butterfly' pattern would show, it was too late. This occurred enough (during the First Intifada IIRC) that the Israeli response changed, with bombing victims who had been hit by the pressure wave but not showing obvious signs of trauma were being taken to hospitals to be cleared or treated as needed.
Fortunately in the US there has been little need to be concerned with injuries of this type for the most part. So far.