South Korea launches Amphibious Tank XK2

evripide

New Member
It is developed by Dusan Infracore and STX Engine. It is a 1500 hp but I don't know the actual size of it though they argue the engine is smaller than many other types of engine that generate similar amounts of power.
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
And that's exactly what is interesting.

If the photo really shows the korean engine than they managed to make it very, very small but with the same hp.
 

DavidDCM

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
And that's exactly what is interesting.

If the photo really shows the korean engine than they managed to make it very, very small but with the same hp.
Yepp, that's what I wanted to show, the Koreans managed to squeeze the same power into an engine only one quarter the size. Even besides the fact that the Leopard 2's engine is more than 40 years old that is still very amazing.

nice that puts to rest the leopard engine rumor
What rumors? :confused:
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
It looks like it is even significantly smaller than the Europowerpack which is available from MTU or the 1500hp turbobar which is installed in the Leclerc.

So I remain a little bit sceptical but if it is reality (With the same power and reliability) than it would be an amazing engine.
 

paulilon

New Member
Humm..

It looks like it is even significantly smaller than the Europowerpack which is available from MTU or the 1500hp turbobar which is installed in the Leclerc.

So I remain a little bit sceptical but if it is reality (With the same power and reliability) than it would be an amazing engine.
The first picture shows the engine + gearbox + airfilters + ...
The second picture shows just the engine, which seems to be about the same size in both pictures. Greatest changes in the power pack size cound be achieved by reducing the size and layout of the gearbox and other accessessories.

Regards, Pauli
 

performance

New Member
The first picture shows the engine + gearbox + airfilters + ...
The second picture shows just the engine, which seems to be about the same size in both pictures. Greatest changes in the power pack size cound be achieved by reducing the size and layout of the gearbox and other accessessories.

Regards, Pauli
europowerpack doesn't have the gearbox integrated. Its mounted separately.

The xk-2 engine is water cooled so you wouldn't see air filters in the first place.
 

paulilon

New Member
europowerpack doesn't have the gearbox integrated. Its mounted separately.

May be, but the engine in the first picture has transmission attached plus lots of other gear like cooling, airfilters, etc. All of this is missing in the second picture. You just cannot compare an complete powerpack and an bare stripped engine.

The xk-2 engine is water cooled so you wouldn't see air filters in the first place.
A tank engine with no airfilters will have REALLY short life.
 

performance

New Member
yes, ok i should of been more clear you can see the air intake on the xk-2 engine. You sure as hell dont need those massive air filters for a water cooled engine. I find it funny that you think they ripped out the air filters and took a picture.

Sorry but you need to be blind to think they are the same size.
 
Last edited:

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
I kow what all the stuff is at the Leo engine. ;)

It just doesn't look like they are the same size. The part marked by David illustrates that very good.
 

evripide

New Member
A new video clip of xk-2

news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LS2D&mid=sec&sid1=100&sid2=267&oid=052&aid=0000186337&iid=
 

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Just compare the two engines. The marked parts are more or less equally sized (BTW, what is this part called in english? ... No wait, what is it even called in German? Antriebswelle?).

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/2352/motorenvergleichle4.jpg
You do realize that on the Leo 2 photo that you have circled the final drive attachment point, and on the K2 photo it is the connection point between the tranny and engine, or is it that I am missing the point that you are making.:)
 

DavidDCM

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
You do realize that on the Leo 2 photo that you have circled the final drive attachment point, and on the K2 photo it is the connection point between the tranny and engine, or is it that I am missing the point that you are making.:)
Uhm, no, I did not realize that :D

I thought both of those were were the connection points between engine and the drive sprocket, if that is the correct name in English.
 

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Sorry DavidDCM, I modified your photo just a little bit, if you wish that I remove it then I will. I thought I would clarify just a little bit on what we are discussing just incase some of our fellow forum readers are a bit confused. :)
 

Letli

New Member
Letli, you do understand that Eckherl is Master Gunner qualified?
Its been more than a year since I've visited this forum, much less this thread - but I'll say this - I dun linger long enough on any forum to bother with who is qualified as what.

You either make sense or you dun. Any good forum should be self-correcting & self-regulating - something that depends on every poster to do so.

Maybe u aren't knowledgeable enough yourself to criticise what he says but he's not all knowledgeable, nobody else is.

I much prefer that you offer more by sticking to the gist of the thread rather than blind hero worship of ppl who are anonymous anyway & in all likelihood, faceless, non-verifiable and an unknown quantity.
 
Top