Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why do most ships only carry 8 Anti Ship missiles?

Discussion in 'Missiles & WMDs' started by 76mmGuns, Sep 13, 2019.

Share This Page

  1. 76mmGuns

    76mmGuns Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2018
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Asia
    I did a search and didn't see a this topic, so I thought I'd ask.

    How did 8 become the defacto number of anti ship missiles to put on warships.

    eg The Arleigh Burke has 96 mk 41 VLS, but only 8 harpoons. Every European frigate/destroyer I've seen also has 8.

    I understand that the VLS are used for many defensive and land attack missiles, but still, why 8 ASM's?

    Why not 4? Or even better, why not 24/40/80 ASM's?

    I suspect someone is going to say that it's not necessary during peacetime to carry more, but even then, how did 8 become the standard for peacetime military ships?

    I do know that ESSM and SM family missiles can be used as anti ship missiles in a secondary role, but that's a recent conversion, and they're too expensive to use to do that regularly. So let's stick to dedicated anti ship missiles :)
     
  2. Ranger25

    Ranger25 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Si Vis Pacem. Para Bellum

    Most VLS, like the MK41, can be loaded with a wide variety of missiles to include ASHM. That’s one of the points of having the versatility of the cells. The exact load out of USN cells is a classified matter. The SM-6 family also has the ability to strike surface as well as Air targets as well
     
  3. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Plenty of ships carry more, it depends on the ship. For example the Russian 22350 has 16 cells to combine LACM and AShM. Israel's Saar 6 carries 16 AShMs, as does Russia's upgraded small missile boat (iirc the Smerch) in the Pacific Fleet. 8 is just a convenient amount, it's what two Harpoon launchers get you, a minimal set up if you will, to maintain the capability. The LCS' in the USN are getting 4 NSM for example.
     
    recce.k1 likes this.
  4. 76mmGuns

    76mmGuns Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2018
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Asia
    VLS launched missiles do not have AS as their primary mission, so that's why I said to exclude them from discussion. The LRASM is barely into production.
     
  5. 76mmGuns

    76mmGuns Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2018
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Asia
    duplicate
     
  6. 76mmGuns

    76mmGuns Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2018
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Asia
    Yes, I know the Russians and Israeli's seem to be the few who carry different numbers.

    Still, doesn't give a documented reason for 8 on Western navies, vs 12/16/20 etc.

    As an aside, the LCS carries 8, not 4. The USS Gabrielle Gifford has 8

    Redirect Notice
     
  7. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
  8. Todjaeger

    Todjaeger Potstirrer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,846
    Likes Received:
    523
    Location:
    not in New England anymore...
    I suspect it has to do with the overall role of the vessels in question, as well as where and how the forces operate. Take the USN for instance. How many USN escort warships have anti-shipping as a primary role for them? I honestly cannot recall any current surface combatants apart from perhaps the LCS that would primarily operate in an anti-shipping or ASuW role. Most of what comes immediately to my mind would be to provide area air defence or an ASW capability, or land attack. It would make sense to have a few AShM in case an ASuW task came up, but every cell taken up by an AShM is one that cannot carry a SAM, LACM, or ASW weapon. IMO it would normally be better to use air-launched AShM due to the greater range (radar horizon) as well as the potential to tailor an appropriate strike package. For nations that do not operate carriers, it would likely make more sense to anticipate MPA launched AShM, or air force strike/fighter aircraft launching based off targeting data feed from MPA.
     
    kinetic likes this.