Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

War Against ISIS

Discussion in 'Geostrategic Issues' started by spikehades, Jun 1, 2013.

Share This Page

  1. spikehades

    spikehades New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Assad's strategic options

    Having followed the conflict closely since its inception, I have often thought long and hard about the possible outcomes and/or long term ramifications of this conflict. It is clear from the recent Government actions of strategic withdrawal to the north and the west that Assad plans to, perhaps as a last resort, create an Alawite fiefdom in the west. In my opinion, it seems like a sound plan of action. I would do the following things to expedite this process;

    1. Strengthen the alliance with Hezbollah (authorise more advanced weapons shipments and finance - thereby using Hezbollah as the strategic deterrent to Israel).
    2. Offer the Kurds autonomy and finance in return for military support against the rebels (thus encircling the rebels).
    3. Split the rebels by making peace with the moderates and attack the extremist elements with prejudice.

    Once the west is consolidated and stabilised future campaigns to retake the anterior of Syria could be initialised. This plan of action would allow the Syrian state to recuperate economically and provide relief for the armed forces. I was interested on receiving more informed opinions on this scenario.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2013
  2. My2Cents

    My2Cents Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,104
    Likes Received:
    0
    The rebels are well aware of this scenario, and believe that as long as Assad is in power that he will eventually return and kill them and their families. The fighting is unlikely to end if Assad attempts to do this. It would also leave the rebels without access to the sea.
    This is likely to bring a direct response by Israel. I suspect that it is likely to happen anyhow when Hezbollah’s either at maximum effort in Syria, or if their losing badly. An Israeli incursion into southern Lebanon to destroy Hezbollah’s weapons when most of their fighters are in Syria, and close their supply and retreat routes for a while, could cripple Hezbollah, possibly destroy it if they become too weak to defend themselves against the other parties in Lebanon’s government.

    And as things are going it there is a good chance it would not upset a majority of the global Sunni population.
    The Kurds have defacto autonomy, and hate and distrust Assad as much as anyone else. The Kurds are staying out of the major conflict, already fighting the Sunni foreign extremists groups that consider them apostates to be killed. So there is nothing of significant value to be gained by either party.

    The Kurds also know that too much autonomy could also upset Turkey enough to intervene, and Assad knows that the Kurds could call on the Iraqi Kurds, which are a significant military power, for help when he tries to reconquer them, they don’t merge earlier.
    Not going to happen. As noted above, all the rebels believe that if Assad stays, they and their families die. It has been standard policy since the family came to power. The Rebels are not even willing to negotiate until Assad agrees to leave.
     
  3. Rimasta

    Rimasta Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    Very interesting point you make about Israel. Do you believe they may see an opportunity here what with thousands of Hezbollah fighters fighting in Syria, that they could be vulnerable now? And with Assad hinting at an offensive in the Golan perhaps Israel will make the preemptive move if it feels threatened.

    Also it struck me ass odd that Assad would mention fighting the Israeli's while he struggling to hold onto his country as it is. Could it be to rally support behind him since Israel isn't everyone's favorite country in that neck of the woods?
     
  4. spikehades

    spikehades New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    At the moment the Syrian government is still paying public servants in the Kurdish area. At some point an official accommodation must be reached with them. [Mod Edit: Text deleted, as you are advocating the use of chemical weapons, against the rebels, in a civil war.

    You have been warned against trolling by Preceptor on 6 August 2012 and had that thread closed for trolling. You did not succeed at your attempt at trolling back then, you will not succeed now. Please go ahead and try the patience of the Mod Team, again; and find out how quickly you will be banned.]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2013
  5. EXSSBN2005

    EXSSBN2005 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Middle of the Ocean going 2kts to nowhere.
    Various sources have said that chemical weapons were used, by both sides but so far the casuality counts have been fairly low, I don't think that the regime wants to escalate to a point that they would be seen as gassing their own people but the same could be said of the rebels as it would indicate that both sides were desperate to win at all costs including killing of their own side for a public relations victory.

    Moscow disappointed political games prevented investigation into chemical weapons use in Syria — RT News

    BBC News - Syria chemical weapons allegations

    Five myths about chemical weapons - The Washington Post

    and cluster weapons

    Syria: Mounting Casualties from Cluster Munitions | Human Rights Watch

    I'm not sure if the Syrians have thermobaric (fuel/air) weapons but they could probably make them easily enough or buy them from Russian sources.

    Edit :they have thermobaric weapons and a article that claimed they used them but i cant get it to load here at work, sorry for the lack of link but it was just a quick google search away.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2013
  6. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,135
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Iirc one of the articles I read stated that an alleged chemical weapon attack in Syria was actually use of thermobaric munitions by the government.

    What I really have to wonder is why you would think this would make a significant difference? The government has already fired Scuds (Luna-B) at the rebels, to little effect, why do you think heavy weapons will resolve the issue?
     
  7. Bonza

    Bonza Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Australia
    Convince me you're not trolling.
     
  8. old faithful

    old faithful Defense Professional Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,169
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Darwin Australia
    Come on Bonza, everything he wrote after "I think" is aimed at starting an argument.....please....
     
  9. My2Cents

    My2Cents Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Standard middle eastern leader call for support from the masses that are trying to take him down. Saddam did much the same thing during Desert Storm, except he didn’t have to worry about Israeli retaliation. The Israeli’s can attack Assad, or rather his troops, easily, which is why his fight with Israel is virtually all talk so far.
    Reports are Hezbollah fighters are streaming across the border to support Assad.
    Hezbollah's Syrian Adventure | Foreign Policy
    With most of Hezbollah’s in Syria, Israel won’t have a better chance to destroy their rocket and missile dumps in southern Lebanon. In addition probably all the current weapons going into Syria have been drawn from Hezbollah’s northern supplies to avoid revealing the location of weapons in the south. So an Israeli attack would leave Hezbollah doubly weakened. Hezbollah will undoubtedly immediately head back to try and defend anything left.

    If Assad is winning at the time of the Israeli attack then Hezbollah abandoning him is likely to reverse the fight. If Assad is losing and the Israelis move fast, they can cut Hezbollah’s lines of supply and retreat, leaving them trapped between the Israeli army and a Sunni population bent on revenge.

    Things won’t be much better for Hezbollah in northern Lebanon, where it looks like a blood feud has started between Hezbollah’s Shia supporters and everyone else. Foreign Sunni imams have declaring jihad and calling for fighters to travel to Lebanon to support the attacking.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/world/middleeast/by-inserting-itself-into-syrian-war-hezbollah-makes-historic-gamble.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    So this is probably the best chance that Israel is likely to ever have to bring about the destruction of Hezbollah. How likely do you think it is that they will pass it up?
     
  10. explorer9

    explorer9 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    India
    Arab spring reintegration or further disintegration of the region?

    Though this article covers the entire region yet the Syrian Civil war can bee seen from it's spectacles. There has only been speculations let us wait till the Geneva- 2 then only it will be clear what course of action Syrian struggle will take place. S 300 whether arrived or not, Mig 29 will be supplied or not and how far Hezbollah can go in side Syria? the Syrian issue has become one of the most controversial swamp in the recent past of global geopolitics.

    Arab Spring – Reintegration or further disintegration of the region? | The Kurdistan Tribune

    [Mod edit: You are consistently discussing politics in threads (and have demonstrated little or no interest in defence matters). You not only have a track record of attempting to troll, you also provide a link that is only about the politics of disrespect directed towards 'western imperialist powers'. Not only is it disrespectful, it contains content that lacks logic and demonstrate an inability to reason (which I assume you agree with). If indeed you do agree with the content, you are done with this forum. We cannot reason with you. You are officially warned:-

    Do not be a nationalistic troll. ​

    We note that this is not your first warning from the Mod Team. We closed a previous thread because of your use of dubious and defective sources like Global Firepower as a source to support your point of view.

    You have just returned from a 7-day ban, to help you remember prior instructions from the Mod Team. We are at the stage where we no longer believe a short ban will help, in your case. Do not continue to try the patience of the Mod Team.

    Follow all Moderator or Super Moderator instructions given in this thread; tolerance mode for further rubbish like posts that defy logic turned-off (and make sure that future posts also conform to the Forum Rules).]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 3, 2013
  11. OPSSG

    OPSSG Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,312
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Singapore
    @spikehades and explorer9, you are both put on notice. Read the respective warnings issued by the Mod Team in this thread; and there is no need to reply to these warning notices.

    Any attempt respond to Mod Warnings will result in sanctions. Continued behaviour in the same vein will also result in sanctions.
     
  12. Rimasta

    Rimasta Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    Well I wouldn't dare assume I know a great deal about the Russian way of making war but could it be possible the therm artic explosives are an attempt to increases the dubious effectiveness of the scuds? Bigger explosions and concussive blast would probably be more devastating than a standard warhead. Again just thinking out loud but the Russians seem to be interested in the use of smaller thermobaric munitions for use in an urbanized setting. Could the Russisns be offering strategic advice in the employment of scuds armed in such a way, based on the Russian army's experience fighting in Grozny? It would seem a good way to blast hidden fighters out of fighting positions in pulverized building/ rubble.
     
  13. Rimasta

    Rimasta Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    Perhaps, or Assad is hoping that by Israel entering the war against an Arab nation he can rally more support for his regime and make it seem ( at least to locals) that the entire war is an Israeli/CIA plot as indigenous propaganda portrays. It seems to me that its for domestic consumption. Would the FSA fight a common enemy and be seen fighting more or less on the side of the Israeli's. seems like such a scenario could weaken Arab support for the rebels.
     
  14. Feanor

    Feanor Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    15,135
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
    Scuds are too inaccurate for such purposes. Even with the much more modern Tochka-U, it took extremely professional crews, during the battle for Komsomolskoye, to use them effectively against massed insurgent formations, and even then in a situation where they were funneled into a known location. Russian use of thermobaric munitions is most common through TOS-1 systems, against strong points like Komsomolskoye, or during the battles for Grozny. I doubt they would be advising the Syrians on the use of Scuds in such a manner. Thermobaric warheads are probably used by RPG and RPO type weapons.

    EDIT: The Syrians just found Sarin in an insurgent weapons cache.

    http://vz.ru/news/2013/6/2/635349.html

    This comes shortly after a chemical weapon factory was discovered in Iraq. And after, on May 6th, a UN commission stated that the chemical weapons used in Syria, were likely used by the anti-government forces.

    Meanwhile Russia seems to be intent to deliver at least some of the MiG-29Ms, that Syria originally bought. Reports put the number at over 10, so we're probably talking about 1 squadron (12).

    http://lenta.ru/news/2013/05/31/mig/
     
  15. STURM

    STURM Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,443
    Likes Received:
    16
    For me, the question is what will the West and the Arab Gulf states will do if Assad makes significant gains on the battlefield and starts to re-capture a lot of the territory taken by the rebels? As I see it, it is obvious that Assad's main strategy will be to ensure nothing happens to bring the Israeli's into the conflict and to further militarily weaken the rebels in the hope that the West and the Arab Gulf states will be left with no choice but to start talking with him - there is not much else he can do as his options are limited. And as for the rebels, their biggest fear - which they will not mention publicly - is that they will be left out in the cold if indeed, Assad reaches some sort of agreement with the West and the Arab Gulf states.

    Robert Fisk: Hezbollah has been lured into unknown territory in Syria as it wages costly battle for survival - Comment - Voices - The Independent

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...t-fisk-reports-from-inside-syria-8590636.html

    [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z286xpFMgI4"]Inside Story - Syria - exploding beyond its borders - YouTube[/nomedia]


    [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQiF-mcUX1I"]Inside Story - Gauging Hezbollah's role in Syria - YouTube[/nomedia]


    Just who has the most to gain if the killing in Syria goes on? - Comment - Voices - The Independent

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...raises-fears-of-arming-hezbollah-8641380.html
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2013
  16. spikehades

    spikehades New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps I could have been more concise and a little more eloquent in my previous post.

    My point is that it would more feasible for the Syrian government to consolidate western Syria, regroup and reinforce. And, instead of immediately attempting to retake the rest of Syria the goal should be to force a war of attrition onto the rebels. The goal would be to cause the most amount casualties possible, eventually leading to the situation whereby the rebels can longer muster an effective fighting force. Then fill the power vacuum or make an accommodation with a "friendly warlord". This is where the heavy weapons come in.
    The russians did something something similar during the second Chechen war and it proved quite effective.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2013
  17. Lcf

    Lcf Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    1
    On the diplomatic field, resolutions condemning regime's offensives against rebels strongholds, like the British drafted reso. from a day or two ago, and, on the battlefield, further aid in man power, as well as support in money and arms and hope they don't lose their breath.
    Aside from that, hardly anything. For now, much of the momentum for an intervention seems to be lost. With Moscow backing him (Assad) both diplomatically and militarily, the price tag just keeps going up. With things stirring up at home, Turks are on the bench. Israel won't act alone unless Assad does something really stupid, like firing those Scuds along the border. And on top of that, there's an upcoming US-Russian-sponsored Geneva conference on Syria, with most of the major western powers partaking which by itself is a way of saying - we have no choice but to talk with him.
     
  18. STURM

    STURM Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,443
    Likes Received:
    16
    True, the fact that Assad has managed to hold on to power, and the fact that not only the Alawites [as to be expected] and other minorities, have stayed loyal [due to fears of sectarian violence if the rebels win], must be a big ''inconveniance'' [to put it mildly] for those who want him gone. Another danger is the situation in Lebanon worsening.
     
  19. Beastmode

    Beastmode Banned Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2013
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    My thoughts

    Hezballoh has stuck their neck awfully far out there for Bashar al-Assad. Israel is watching two of it's most bitter enemies getting chewed up in an insurgency. Great strategic and tactical opportunities await them assuming their Washington lobbyist can play the "terrorist organization" trump card and gain support. It's a flankers delight.

    As for the rebels it's all or nothing. The second the Syrian army troops deserted to the FSA they signed their own death warrant. Everyone tied in with that lot are marked for death. They no longer have a choice, they have to win.

    Bashar al-Assad is in too deep now, if he turned back some months ago he could had probably negotiated his freedom. If he is lucky the ICC will get him though I imagine he will probably die like Gaddafi. the blood of 80,000 simply doesn't wash away. He is going to fight this insurgency to the death just like his father did. That is his inspiration and his father pulled it off. He is gambling that he can do the same.

    The Syrian army is going to continue raising their escalation of force until the rebels situation is no longer tenable. Tip toeing along perilous lines trying to find the right balance between combat effectiveness and not provoking the West. Striking hard simply isn't going to be enough to turn the tide against fanatics.

    I'm curious what the West is going to do. You start handing out weapons... Mission creep is a slippery slope....

    Out
     
  20. Bonza

    Bonza Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Australia
    You were perfectly concise. You advocated for the use of chemical weapons in a civil war and referred to the rebellion as a whole as "thugs with guns".

    You were looking to arc people up and now you've got the attention you wanted but all of a sudden you want to change the discussion to something more reasonable. Do you think this isn't blindingly apparent to everyone looking at the thread, and your post history?