USS Lincoln to deploy next month

The Watcher

New Member
USS Lincoln to deploy next month

Sep 6, 2004, 12:26

EVERETT, Wash. -- The USS Abraham Lincoln will leave on deployment in mid-October, not early next year as the Navy had previously planned.

The Everett-based aircraft carrier was last deployed for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, spending 290 days at sea.

The Nimitz-class carrier, which has a crew of about 5,000 when its air wing is on board, returned to Everett in May 2003, shortly after President Bush swooped in on an S-3B Viking jet and declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended.

Before Saturday's surprise announcement, Navy officials had repeatedly said the Lincoln would leave early in 2005.

"Their schedule changed unexpectedly," Navy Lt. Kim Marks, a spokeswoman for the Third Fleet in San Diego, told The (Everett) Herald. "The ship just found out."

The Navy said the carrier would deploy to the western Pacific, but Marks said she could not say whether it would be returning to the Persian Gulf and the war in Iraq.

The Lincoln has been at sea in recent weeks for pre-deployment training. It's been a rare sight in Everett since its return last year.

The carrier spent about 11 months in the Bremerton shipyard for $280 million in repairs, and has been in and out of Naval Station Everett for training since early June.

The Navy said it would announce later which ships will accompany the Lincoln on its deployment.

A Lincoln spokesman previously reported that the Everett-based guided-missile destroyer USS Shoup had joined the Lincoln's strike group.

The Lincoln will also get a new air wing. Carrier Air Wing Two will embark on the Lincoln during its next deployment. Carrier Air Wing 14 deployed with it last time.

The Lincoln's nearly nine months at sea ended up being one the longest deployments of a nuclear-powered carrier since Vietnam.

More than 1,600 sorties were flown from the carrier while it supported the Iraq war. Its battle group fired 116 Tomahawk missiles. No aircraft or Navy personnel were lost.

Images of the Lincoln and Bush standing beneath a "Mission Accomplished" banner have aired frequently in recent weeks as the 2004 presidential campaign has heated up. The banner has been criticized as the fighting in Iraq continues and the U.S. death toll approaches 1,000.

URL of this article:
http://www.defencetalk.com/news/publish/article_001863.shtml
 

highsea

New Member
It seems to me that if we are accelerating it's redeployment, it's not heading for the Pacific!

Can you say naval blockade of Iran?

-CM
 

mysterious

New Member
Naval blockade of Iran would be a bit too touchy for US forces and Iran at this moment in time I think. :smokingc:
 

srirangan

Banned Member
Well there have been numerous under shelf reports of increasing US preparations for a war over Iran, and this is just yet another hint pointing towards what seems to be the inevitable.
 

highsea

New Member
tatra said:
$280 million in repairs
That's some repairs!
Tatra, I've seen these boats when they get back in. They look pretty freaking rough. 280M pretty much gives us a new paint job and cycles a new crew and some fresh AC. No Biggee. I'm sure the numbers are 1/2 phony anyway.

The fact that they pushed the schedule up on the Abe means one of two things. Either the boats in the gulf are taking a beating faster than we anticipated, or we want to add to the force. Most likely it's the former, as we are not currently running sorties from the CBG's, they're just out there cooking in the sun. So they are not under any particular pressure, (that they would need reinforced).

But it would be nice to give a break to the guys that are there right now. I'm sure they would like to see their families, even for a short time. It's safe to say those boats are looking fairly scrappy about now, and we do have a fondness for fresh paint. ;) Chipped and faded paint doesn't mean we can't do the job, but you know, we do like to look good as we go about business. So it may be that the Abe's accelerated redeploy has only to do with maintenance.

But maybe not.

Certainly the first step we would do to lean on Iran (or Bully them, depending on your loyalties) would be to push on their economy. This should be obvious to anyone. The easiest way to do this (without UN blessing) is to shut down maritime traffic. What are they going to do? Move their goods through Syria or Iraq?

Not to criticize the UN, but they're not interested in maintaining a positive strategic posture for the US. That's our job.

Anyway, I still maintain, for us to send a CBG back out this far ahead of schedule, well, it ain't going to the West Pacific. Nuff Said.

-CM
 

highsea

New Member
srirangan said:
Well there have been numerous under shelf reports of increasing US preparations for a war over Iran, and this is just yet another hint pointing towards what seems to be the inevitable.
True, true. Iran backed off today on their IAEA posture. They agreed to stop the centrifuge/UF6 operation. But we in the US, you know, we're all from Kansas. :D: Our motto is show us. We're prepared for Iran to play games...We can play too.

-CM
 

Pathfinder-X

Tribal Warlord
Verified Defense Pro
Generally a carriers takes 7 to 8 years to construct, and 2 to 3 years to do sea trial before it's operational. Take USS Ronald Reagan for example, plans were approved in 1993 and commissioned in 2003, a whole decade passed before it is ready for service.
 

highsea

New Member
Pathfinder is right, about 5-7 years once construction begins.

The current project is the George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) It is scheduled for delivery in 2008. This will be the last Nimitz class carrier. The keel was laid in 2003.

Our next generation carrier, CVN-21 is scheduled for construction to begin in 2007, with delivery expected in 2014. A $1.36 Billion contract for construction preperation work was announced last May.

http://www.nn.northropgrumman.com/news/2004/052104_CVN21_Contract/052104_CVN21_Contract.stm

-CM
 

adsH

New Member
Pathfinder-X said:
Take USS Ronald Reagan for example, plans were approved in 1993 and commissioned in 2003, a whole decade passed before it is ready for service.
oh yeah brilliant ceremony watched it live.
 
Top