USAF News and Discussion

[swerve]

E2s limited max altitude will cut down over the horizon scan range. Making matters worse there are only 16 in the USN. Those 16 are supposed to be cycled with the active CVNs so increasing demand on fixed supply. Justified by hopes and Promises that the Spaceforce option will mature….

Are you sure about that? I've seen the figure of 88 E-2D built, mostly for the USN, & any that haven't been lost should still be in service. The E-2D is in production for France, Japan & I think still the USN.

 

[Terran]

You’re right I am wrong. I must have crossed my wires. It should be 78.

 

[swerve]

IIRC that's the number of USAF E-3s still in service. I can imagine that sort of obscure crossover of thoughts.

 

[StevoJH]

Given the recent IOTUS-Musk feud, it is surprising the E7 is being $hitcanned for a space based alternative using SpaceX rockets. Furthermore, this will take longer to deploy. Yes, aircraft vulnerability could be an issue but the E2 is perhaps more vulnerable than an E7 albeit more E2s can be acquired. Personally I believe the first consequence of a peer-to-peer conflict will the destruction of satellites by both nuclear EMP and kinetic hits thus ruining the future use of space near earth due to massive amounts of debris.

At least most of these satellites are in LEO, hopefully the debris would have all deorbited within 5-10 years depending on altitude.

But yeah, relying on space based sensors in a high intensity peer on peer conflict is asking for trouble.

There is a reason why advanced inertial systems are still under heavy development, along with deployable ground based systems such as eLORAN.