A friend of mine has a paid AI, so I asked him to get an AI conclusion about that "credibility gap" of Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel + recruits = UAF + AWOL + permanent losses; maths don't lie, governments do. For some reason, the AI kept going for losses estimates, including those in this report.
Public Annual Report 2025. Military Intelligence and Security Service.
Original in Dutch, AI translated.
Openbaar Jaarverslag, over het jaar 2025, van de Militaire Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (MIVD). Openbaar Jaarverslag MIVD 2025
www.rijksoverheid.nl
The Russian Federation
Russia poses the largest and most direct threat to peace and stability in Europe, thereby directly endangering our national security interests.
-So, if I were reading this from the other side of the hill, Europe would be the one “endangering our national security interests.” No one has enough imagination to do that?
The war in Ukraine is part of a long-term Russian effort towards a fundamental change in the European security architecture and the international legal order. Russia seeks a multipolar world order in which it is one of the global powers. This context gives the war in Ukraine an existential character for the Russian regime.
-Suddenly, Russia is fighting for its existence. Go figure!
As long as Russia is fighting in Ukraine, a conventional war against NATO is virtually excluded.
-Ergo, it is in the best interest of NATO to fight to the last Ukrainian soldier.
And create favourable conditions for Russia. This poses a real risk of unintended and thus difficult-to-manage escalation.
-For Russia
and for us. Like killing an Archduke in Sarajevo or like: “Let's take (illegally) possession of all those frozen assets because Russia will do nothing about it.”
Russia remains capable of making incremental territorial gains across multiple fronts.
The MIVD estimates that Russia has suffered approximately 1.2 million permanent loses. In 2025, a concerning trend is observed where the ratio of daily casualties is moving closer together due to an increasing number of Ukrainian permanent losses. This ratio is unfavourable for Ukraine, as it is, unlike Russia, unable or barely able to replenish its losses.
-So, we have our (national security interests-virtually excluded) estimate and that Ukraine may have been suffering those 27,000 casualties since, at least, 2025.
Despite the losses in Ukraine, Russia has also been able to implement reconstruction and expansion of its armed forces in 2025. As long as the Ukrainian defence holds, the buildup of a potential Russian military threat towards NATO territory is delayed.
-Keeping Ukraine “in the fight” sounds better than “to the last Ukrainian soldier”.
A significant qualitative improvement in the performance of the Russian armed forces. The improvement (ZAPAD-2025) of command and control and the integration of unmanned systems at all levels. The Russian armed forces demonstrate a strong adaptive capability. The Russian armed forces have not only become larger but also more effective than before the war in Ukraine.
-No surprise there, it is an Army at war. Also, if the competition is better, the threat is bigger.
Dutch Military Intelligence seems to be fond of reality too.