vikingatespam
Well-Known Member
I think we can agree I am being somewhat sarcastic here.I would say that having many military bases straddle your boarder when you are quite vocal about the perceived threat and it continues to grow,, is a far cry from attacking someone for owning a goldfish.
I have been around and around this issue with rsemmes:One must remember context here now there is the argument for why NATO continued to expand its potential capabilities vs Russia but the fact they do when Russia has made attempts at de-escalation is important.
1) Ukraine was not going to join NATO. It couldnt, according to the by-laws of NATO.
2) NATO was never a threat to Russia. As of late 2021, NATO was withering on the vine. Its still rather toothless, even after almost 4 years of this war.
3) The entire "NATO expansion" concern is bogus. Putin couldnt care less about NATO. After all, he worked real hard to get SWE and FIN to join.
The entire issue revolves around keeping UKR a vassal state, a puppet state, like Belarus. If UKR was firmly under the control of a Ukrainian Lukashenko, then NATO wouldnt involvement wouldnt be an issue at all.
Yet, building a fence is entirely rational and ethical. Does UKR have the right to not be Russian ? I would think so.If you want a metaphor this is more like building a fence on your neighbors lawn after he told you that if you did that he would tear it down. Both the building of the fence and the tearing of it down in that case are highly aggressive actions