The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

T.C.P

Well-Known Member
After almost 8 days of no decent footage release by the Russian side, we saw a glut released yesterday.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/w1wfpe
Two Hermes TV guided missiles. One missiles footage of the other. The russians on telegra claim this has 100km of range, but the realistic efffective range of 30km as mentioned by other sources, seem more realisitic. But even then this is a longer rnage than the Vikhr missiles. If the Ka-52ks had enough of these they would have been capable of dealing a lot more damage to the UA side.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/w1wofs
A snippet of this video was released day before yesterday, this is the longer version. First strike at 3:10 in the video. This is some quite accurate fire. The losses should be significant. There is debate in the comments section about what was the source of the strike- SPH/MLRS. I hope one of our experts on this board can give us a better estimate on the type of artillery used.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/w273hf
Some very good sniper footage. 3 UA soldiers shot in the exact same spot. I have zero military expereince, and i have no idea why they seem not to react to the first 2 shots, maybe the sound of artillery and water was disguising the sound of the rifle?

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/w1v1tc
A SU-34m allegedly brought down by friendly fire, footage of the wreck- https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1548928553571553280?s=20&t=ZWzMZSbToFitJDWN5Xh_Ug

claim that it was a su-34m
Only a handful of 2u-34Ms exist, so this is a significant loss.
 

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
Two Hermes TV guided missiles. One missiles footage of the other. The russians on telegra claim this has 100km of range, but the realistic efffective range of 30km as mentioned by other sources, seem more realisitic. But even then this is a longer rnage than the Vikhr missiles. If the Ka-52ks had enough of these they would have been capable of dealing a lot more damage to the UA side
TV guided missiles aren't a new tech yet are a significant improvement over many other alternatives like the dominantly SACLOS ATGMs used by Russia, or the various laser or GPS guided aerial munitions.
That is because not only do they allow scanning an area before impact, but they provide good BDA capabilities, especially if fired in volleys, and require much less intel on a target. Instead of needing precise location, they can be employed while knowing only a somewhat general location of an enemy.

This might cause a notable improvement in Russian performance. The west should realize they need to revive their own similar programs (e.g UK's Exactor that was more or less abandoned) and start supplying these to Ukraine.
Unfortunately the only prolific missile with TV guidance in the west is the Spike, which requires Israeli permission - which won't happen unless some specific events on the Iran front occur.

What should also worry the west is that TV guided missiles, although very capable, require simpler construction than other types of missiles, and so are not as difficult to build as some alternatives amid sanctions.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
As some have noted, the newly arrived HIMARS precision rockets are causing Russian howitzers to adopt shoot and scoot tactics. When these efforts fail, the Ukrainian Army are killing the Russian gunners and destroying their munitions dumps. Meanwhile, Russia is rapidly expending its weapons stocks, and Ukraine is rapidly expending those of NATO stocks.

Something to think about — Munitions (quantity & quality), range and accuracy all matter.
 
Last edited:

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
An interview with one of Putin's oldest enemy and is advice on how to deal with Putin. This is a Canadian CBC interview.

A claim that the US Congress in the NDAA has authorised US$100 million for the training of Ukrainian Air Force pilots and maintenance personnel in the operation of US fixed wing combat aircraft. This does not mean that the US has authorised the transfer or sale of US combat aircraft to Ukraine, by the US or any other country.

Russia is increasing its attacks on Ukrainian ports at the same time that it is supposedly negotiating the safe transit of Ukrainian wheat out of the Black Sea to the world. Actions speak louder than words.
 

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
As some have noted, the newly arrived HIMARS precision rockets are causing Russian howitzers to adopt shoot and scoot tactics. When these efforts fail, the Ukrainian Army are killing the Russian gunners and destroying their munitions dumps. Meanwhile, Russia is rapidly expending its weapons stocks, and Ukraine is rapidly expending those of NATO stocks.
Good. Shoot and scoot is a necessary thing for survivability, but is costly, and in Russia's case means they'll have more visible logistics and more volume of vulnerable comms.
 

tabu

Member
A claim that the US Congress in the NDAA has authorised US$100 million for the training of Ukrainian Air Force pilots and maintenance personnel in the operation of US fixed wing combat aircraft. This does not mean that the US has authorised the transfer or sale of US combat aircraft to Ukraine, by the US or any other country.
Kremlin discusses preparations for referendums in Donetsk and Luhansk people's republics

The Kremlin does not set the task of holding referendums simultaneously on all Ukrainian territories that have come under Russian control. They may first take place in the LNR and DNR, RBC's sources said.


If a referendum is held in Luhansk on September 11 on the annexation of this region to Russia, which could be a direct change in the state borders of Russia and Ukraine, i.e. Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territories, this move by Russia will very likely lead to a decision by the US Congress and Senate, signed automatically by Biden, to hand over a certain number of combat aircraft with weapons and equipment to the AFU. The training of Ukrainian pilots and ground staff is only a first step in response to Russian threats. Further steps will depend on what Russia does with the occupied territories. Step by..
 

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
Kremlin discusses preparations for referendums in Donetsk and Luhansk people's republics

The Kremlin does not set the task of holding referendums simultaneously on all Ukrainian territories that have come under Russian control. They may first take place in the LNR and DNR, RBC's sources said.
The referendums don't actually have to take place. This is a facade, as they can technically just have the local governments "vote" to be annexed to Russia and that's it.
It will give Russia a way to express its tone for the following months.
Oddly, knowing Russian propaganda methods, I have a feeling it won't be as straightforward as unanimous votes for annexation.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Update.

Kherson-Nikolaev-Odessa.

Ukrainian strikes are hitting Kherson, Russian air defenses are firing.


Explosions in Odessa.


We have reports of an unsuccessful assassination attempt at the head of the Kherson Military-Civil Administration.


A 9M21 9K52 Luna-M rocket was intercepted by Russian forces in Kherson region. Either Ukraine managed to hold on to some from Soviet times and has returned them to service, or they were sourced from another operator. The type was relatively common.


The North.

Remains of Russian helos still litter Gostomel' airport.


LDNR Front.

Shellings of Donetsk continued.


DNR mortar strikes on Ukrainian positions. Location unclear.


Grads firing near Gorlovka.


Russian TOS-1 firing towards Seversk.


Air defenses firing over Lugansk, possibly trying to intercept some of the recent strikes against ammo storage facilities.


Shahtersk and Torez got hit by Ukrainian strikes, the targets may have been Russian military storage.


Russia hit a Ukrainian staging area in Chasovoy Yar, Russian sources are claiming combined 30 KIA/WIA, Ukrainian sources so far apparently claim 16 KIA and 6 WIA as rescue operations continue. This is near Artemovsk/Bakhmut.


The villages of Tripol'ye and Valdimirovka have reportedly fallen as Russian and rebel forces inch towards Soledar.


Anti-tank weapons captured by Russian forces near Seversk.


Pieces of an M739 detonator found in Donetsk, suggesting that it was shelled by a western-supplied weapon system.


Russian Ka-52 over Donetsk area.


There is speculation that the strike against a rebel munition storage area in Donetsk was made possible by information leaked on social media. The strike occurred on July 9th-10th (night) and reportedly involved 20 KIA and 40 WIA.


Misc.

Russian artillery in action, location and context unclear.


Russian mortar unit in action, location and context unclear. Note how they are hiding the mortar.


Ukrainian infiltrator team with anti-tank weapons taken POW, location and context unclear.


Russian Tochkas are spotted again, location unclear, possibly Ukraine. There has been some noise about them getting handed over to the rebels, but nothing concrete.


Haphazardly up-armored T-62Ms (I think one is an MV). Location and context unclear.


T-90M allegedly in Ukraine, location and context unclear.


Ukrainian territorial defense with 82mm Iranian mortars. These come from Iranian weapon shipments to the Houthis seized at sea.

 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
I'm about a week behind, but I'll try to close the gap over the next few days.

The referendums don't actually have to take place. This is a facade, as they can technically just have the local governments "vote" to be annexed to Russia and that's it.
It will give Russia a way to express its tone for the following months.
Oddly, knowing Russian propaganda methods, I have a feeling it won't be as straightforward as unanimous votes for annexation.
Spilled blood, time passing, and people growing up in a new reality tends to change public opinions. In '14 I don't think there is any way Russia could reasonably count on winning that kind of referendum. After 8 years of war, people dying, people serving in the rebel forces, Russia paying pensions and providing aid, and propaganda telling stories about Ukraine, there is a generation that has grown up in this world. Those who were 8 in 2014, are 16 today. Those who were 16 are now 24. Those who were particularly unhappy about the rebellion have left, and in quite large numbers. What I've seen suggests a pre-'14 population of 4.5 million in rebel areas, currently down to ~3.5. In other words over 20% of the population left. The rest have lived with this reality. I wouldn't be surprised if Russia could run a legitimate referendum among the current population of the LDNR areas, and end up with a pro-Russian majority.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Which is why the Ukrainians say any referedum has to include those who've left since 2014.
This is actually a pretty normal stance for many situations where mass displacement of population occurs. But last time I checked Ukraine's position was that no referendum would be happening, the territory is Ukrainian and that's the end of it. And of course Russia administering a referendum for reasons for internal legitimacy will not listen at all to what Ukraine has to say on the subject.
 

tabu

Member
You are confusing rebels and collaborators. A rebel is a person who wants freedom for his homeland, which was once invaded by the enemy. A collaborator invites the enemy to his homeland. Where you have found rebels on the territory of Ukraine - I do not understand, they do not exist, but there are collaborators. And there is a substitution of notions. And on the territory of the Russian Federation there are both. The former are being destroyed, the latter are in favour. And there is no LNR, DPR and other artificial formations, but there are Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia with the help of collaborators.

By the way, Russia, as the successor of the USSR, does not deny the Helsinki Accords, which in
In the international legal field it states:
enshrining the political and territorial outcome of the Second World War, setting out principles for relations between participating states, including the principle of inviolability of borders; territorial integrity of states; non-interference in the internal affairs of foreign states.



Banned permanently for failing to heed Moderators warnings about posting quality and for politics in this post.

Ngatimozart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
You are confusing rebels and collaborators. A rebel is a person who wants freedom for his homeland, which was once invaded by the enemy. A collaborator invites the enemy to his homeland. Where you have found rebels on the territory of Ukraine - I do not understand, they do not exist, but there are collaborators. And there is a substitution of notions. And on the territory of the Russian Federation there are both. The former are being destroyed, the latter are in favour. And there is no LNR, DPR and other artificial formations, but there are Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia with the help of collaborators.

By the way, Russia, as the successor of the USSR, does not deny the Helsinki Accords, which in
In the international legal field it states:
enshrining the political and territorial outcome of the Second World War, setting out principles for relations between participating states, including the principle of inviolability of borders; territorial integrity of states; non-interference in the internal affairs of foreign states.


I'm not interested in this political discussion. If this is the conversation you want to have, there are segments of the Russian internet where you will find people to argue with ad nauseam about who are the collaborators and what they consider their homeland. I use the term "rebel" as an umbrella term for all fighting formations fielded by the LDNR. This is a useful categorization to separate the forces they field from those fielded by Russian regulars and Russian irregulars. They are in open rebellion against the Ukrainian government, therefore I believe the term is appropriate. You are welcome to disagree.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Update.

Kherson-Nikolaev-Odessa.

Ukrainian strike near the Kahovskaya hydro-electric dam.


Battle damage from Ukrainian strikes in Novaya Kahovka.


At least some of the strike was using HIMARS.


Allegedly the strike on Novaya Kahovka caused 7 KIA and 40 WIA, no breakdown on attribution (Russian military, civilians, rebels, etc.) The location was apparently recently filmed by a US satellite.


Russian strikes in Nikolaev, some against an alleged munition storage.


The aftermath of a Russian strike in Nikolaev as seen by apparently Ukraine's 131st Recon btln.


Zaporozhye-Dnepropetrovsk.

Russian strikes of Ukrainian positions, Zaporozhye. Note these appear to be UAV strikes, using an unknown type of munition.


Allegedly a Ukrainian UAV strike in Energodar.


Ukrainian UAVs downed in Energodar.


There has been an exchange of bodies in Zaporozhye region, 40 for 40.


Tochka-U has shown up in Melitopol'. The last batch we saw was in the LNR area. Presumably these are two different elements.


Kharkov-Sumy.

Russian strikes in Kharkov.


LDNR Front.

Shellings of Donetsk continue.


Russian Uragan strikes towards Seversk.


Russian artillery firing towards Artemovsk/Bakhmut.


Air defenses firing over Lugansk. Apparently Ukraine hit the local air defense unit. Reportedly the city itself wasn't harmed.


Large scale Russian strikes took place around Avdeevka. Recently there has been a slow rebel move to encircle the town from the north.


A Ukrainian M-777 position that got hit. Russian sources allege Ukraine is hauling away the destroyed M-777s to avoid the negative exposure.


An M-777 howitzer, knocked out, and captured.


An M-777 destroyed in Lisichansk. Unclear if the same as above.


A destroyed Oshkosh M1083. I suspect it might go with the howitzer above.


DNR forces have taken the Blue Lakes resort town.


Near Volnovakha, we see T-80BVs and a T-80B. This is the first time we've see a T-80B in this war. The source claims these are Russian regulars which is possible but rebel reservists are a likelier candidate. These are definitely vehicles out of storage.


I believe rebel D-20 and D-30, Donbass.


Russia.

Russian Mi-28UB strikes, near the border, Belgorod region.


Russian National Guard returning from Ukraine, Tambov.


Russian National Guard returning from Ukraine, Dagestan.


Misc.

Ukrainian M-777 firing. Location and context unclear. Interestingly enough the two truck is a KrAZ.


Russian Ka-52 lobbing rockets, location and context unclear.


Russian strikes, allegedly against a Ukrainian Msta-S, location unclear.


Russian SpN using a Tigr-M with a RCWS. Location and context unclear.


Russian uparmored trucks.


Russian or rebel BMP-2 uparmored with tracks.


Russian T-90M allegedly in Ukraine, location and context unclear.


NATO/EU.

The UK is launching a training program to train 10 000 Ukrainian service members, probably the biggest such program so far.


Ukrainian troops training in Britain.


There are reports that Spain will hand over 10 Leo-2A4s and 20 M113s to Ukraine.

 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Interesting detail, Ukraine has begun striking the Antonov bridge in Kherson. Its unclear if the target is the bridge itself or if there were Russian troop movements on the bridge, but it's gotten hit twice so far.
 

Arji

Active Member
Interesting detail, Ukraine has begun striking the Antonov bridge in Kherson. Its unclear if the target is the bridge itself or if there were Russian troop movements on the bridge, but it's gotten hit twice so far.
What's the bridge value? Is it on the path of advance or simply to cut off supply of forward Russian troops?
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
Interesting detail, Ukraine has begun striking the Antonov bridge in Kherson.
Ukrainian lately talk on big counter offensive in Nikolayev-Kherson front. Their aim to retake Kherson. However this action in the ground seems shown the other way around. The Ukranian seems worries with the momentum in Donbas moving to Russian side, Russian will going to use the momentum from Kherson toward Nikolayev.

Try to cutting main bridges that can support Russian supply lines toward Nikolayev front seems shown that tendencies. As I mentioned before, I don't think Russian will going to make large movement on other fronts unless they already achieve securing whole Donbas. Perhaps Ukranian see something else.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
What's the bridge value? Is it on the path of advance or simply to cut off supply of forward Russian troops?
It's the only bridge to Kherson from the rest of the region, and there are large Russian forces that use that bridge as a supply route. In theory Russia troops could be cut off by destroying the bridge.



Ukrainian lately talk on big counter offensive in Nikolayev-Kherson front. Their aim to retake Kherson. However this action in the ground seems shown the other way around. The Ukranian seems worries with the momentum in Donbas moving to Russian side, Russian will going to use the momentum from Kherson toward Nikolayev.

Try to cutting main bridges that can support Russian supply lines toward Nikolayev front seems shown that tendencies. As I mentioned before, I don't think Russian will going to make large movement on other fronts unless they already achieve securing whole Donbas. Perhaps Ukranian see something else.
Maybe that's the plan for the counter-offensive. Destroy the bridge and try to use the supply situation for Russian forces to launch a major offensive. Even if no offensive is coming (and let's be clear, Ukraine has been declaring counter-offensives against Kherson nearly non-stop) it could still create problems for Russia.
 
Top