The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates

riksavage

Banned Member
According to the Telegraph, T45 7 & 8 WILL also be built, where they got the info from I don't know. I can only assume they will be a late batch three once the Carriers are completed. At least with eight we can provide cover for a full Carrier amphib battle group without relying on our Allies.

The Carrier news means that BVT will hire a new generation of marine technicians, engineers, welders et al, which will have a huge knock-on effect as the UK looks to build the next generation of Frigates (C1, 2 &3).
 

Super Nimrod

New Member
Its been said elsewhere but I would not be surprised if the T45 after number 6 either Morphs into the C1 or into a specific land attack derivative after a suitable period of inactivity
 

harryriedl

Active Member
Verified Defense Pro
According to the Telegraph, T45 7 & 8 WILL also be built, where they got the info from I don't know. I can only assume they will be a late batch three once the Carriers are completed. At least with eight we can provide cover for a full Carrier amphib battle group without relying on our Allies.

The Carrier news means that BVT will hire a new generation of marine technicians, engineers, welders et al, which will have a huge knock-on effect as the UK looks to build the next generation of Frigates (C1, 2 &3).
could you link it please? it would be excellent news as 6 it a bit hit and miss for cover of CBG
 

davros

New Member
That would be great news both CVF and 8 Type 45 would be excellent now lets just hope we get enough F-35 to equip both CVF, I wonder what the final choice on AEW will be, has there been any more news on this?
 

StevoJH

The Bunker Group
That would be great news both CVF and 8 Type 45 would be excellent now lets just hope we get enough F-35 to equip both CVF, I wonder what the final choice on AEW will be, has there been any more news on this?
Just to make a point, but when a government says they are not going to build 2 ships, isn't it something that they generally don't change their minds about if they have a choice?

Shows indecision and gives the opposition another excuse to call them incompetent.
 

windscorpion

New Member
In 2 years time it will be a new government, whatever the political colour. T45 7+8 could well be built one day, the T42 was built over a long period.
 
it,s necessary a new class of well armed OPV,s maybe similar to the french floreal class as with the decreasing number of escorts they will be good for patrol waters such as caribbean, gulf, etc.
 

spsun100001

New Member
Obviously there's a fair split between pessimists and optimists on this board. Someone made a point in a recent posts about predictions that have been up on the thread since it started.

That got me to thinking about inviting everyone to post their assumptions about the Royal Navy in one post and to make a mental note to come back and take a look at them every 12 months to see whether optimism or pessimism seems to be well founded!

Here's mine

1) The future carriers will be built but will be delayed. To keep the costs down they will have minimal self defence capabilities (such as Phalanx fitted from the retiring Invincible's).

2) The AEW platform will be the Sea King with Searchwater initially with the service lives for these machines extended as long as possible. It will be replaced with ASW Merlins refitted with Searchwater thus reducing the overall number of helicopters in the fleet.

3) The buy for the F35 will be cut to around 60 aircraft replacing the Harrier GR9's roughly 1:1. This will provide enough to deploy around 18 on each of the CV's in normal deployment configuration or a full air wing of 36 for one carrier in combat conditions unless the aircraft are deployed on land based CAS missions.

4) The number of Astute's will be reduced from 8 to 7.

5) The Type 22 Batch 3 frigates will be retired and the 7th and 8th Type 45's will not be ordered. This will reduce the escort force to 19 ships.

6) The Type 45's will remain without a land attack missile, an anti-ship missile and anti-submarine torpedoes. They will not be fitted with the Phalanx CIWS to save costs.

7) The design for the C3 will be fixed with no embarked helicopter (which IMHO means we might as well not even bother to build them as they will be bog all use for nearly all the roles that are required)

8) The number of MARS ships will be reduced to 3 or 4 to reflect the smaller surface fleet that needs to be supported.

9) There will be no dockyard closures. Closed dockyards = jobs lost and safeguarding industrial jobs is a more important priority for the government when it comes to defence spending than anything else.

10) HMS Ocean will be retired when the CV's come into service on the grounds that they can act as LPH platforms.

11) We will firm up the replacement for Trident based on 3 SSBN's. As last time 50% of the funding for these boats will come from the existing procurement budget.

I'd ask you to put your own predictions up rather than just having a pop at mine. You can't prove mine wrong and I can't prove them right. Just put your own views and let's let time show who got it right.

Cheers

Steve
Well, just about three months on I was looking at how many of these I'd got right and how many I might have to revise to reflect things moving on since.

Number 1: now confirmed; the carriers are ordered and the publicity is still showing them with minimal self-defence capabilities.

Number 2: yet to be seen but I'm keeping it as a prediction. All the talk still seems to be centred around a toytown helo based AEW solution.

Number 3: another wait and see but I'm sticking with the prediction. The RAF are still squandering most of the defence budget on Typhoon's so that they can mothball them in hangers, the delays to the A400, tempo of operations and chronic state of the transport fleet means that something will have to give so my bet would still be on the F35.

Number 4: I'd still go with although with pressure on the defence budget, falling government revenue and a need to fund the Trident replacement I'd not be suprised to see no orders beyond the current 4 Astutes. It's a bit too early to get that gloomy though I think so I'll still stay with 7 although with the last three boats much delayed to help with funding.

Number 5: well, I don't know if it's now confirmed for definite that it will be only 6 Type 45's but I think you can bet on it. I'm staying with the prediction that an announcement will be along in the next few months of the type 22's being mothballed or decomissioned so the escort fleet will come down to 19.

Number 6: Phalanx has not appeared on the Type 45's as they have begun trials. I'm prepared to stick with the prediction that none of the capabilities listed will be funded.

Number 7: Talk seems around non-embarked helicopter designs meaning we will I think manage to establish a new contender for the crown of most useless ship class ever to comission into the Navy. So I'm sticking with this prediction.

Number 8: Sticking with this prediction as well. Fewer escorts will require fewer support vessels.

Number 9: No closures announced so far so Ilm staying with this one. We all know the defence budget is really there to provide revenue to BAe and jobs and has nothing to do with defending the country.

Number 10: Also still alive and kicking as a prediction and in fact she might go earlier if reports of her poor condition are well founded.

Number 11: Staying with this one too.

Sadly, so far my pessimistic predictions have either come true or are still possible with some appearing more likely. Still, make real terms cuts in the defence budget year on year, operate at a tempo well above your planning assumptions, insist in buying overpriced indigenous crap for almost every defence need, continue buying tactical fighters we don't need and treat the defence budget as if it's primary role is civilian job creation and that's what you get I suppose.

Steve
 
Well, just about three months on I was looking at how many of these I'd got right and how many I might have to revise to reflect things moving on since.

Number 1: now confirmed; the carriers are ordered and the publicity is still showing them with minimal self-defence capabilities.

Number 2: yet to be seen but I'm keeping it as a prediction. All the talk still seems to be centred around a toytown helo based AEW solution.

Number 3: another wait and see but I'm sticking with the prediction. The RAF are still squandering most of the defence budget on Typhoon's so that they can mothball them in hangers, the delays to the A400, tempo of operations and chronic state of the transport fleet means that something will have to give so my bet would still be on the F35.

Number 4: I'd still go with although with pressure on the defence budget, falling government revenue and a need to fund the Trident replacement I'd not be suprised to see no orders beyond the current 4 Astutes. It's a bit too early to get that gloomy though I think so I'll still stay with 7 although with the last three boats much delayed to help with funding.

Number 5: well, I don't know if it's now confirmed for definite that it will be only 6 Type 45's but I think you can bet on it. I'm staying with the prediction that an announcement will be along in the next few months of the type 22's being mothballed or decomissioned so the escort fleet will come down to 19.

Number 6: Phalanx has not appeared on the Type 45's as they have begun trials. I'm prepared to stick with the prediction that none of the capabilities listed will be funded.

Number 7: Talk seems around non-embarked helicopter designs meaning we will I think manage to establish a new contender for the crown of most useless ship class ever to comission into the Navy. So I'm sticking with this prediction.

Number 8: Sticking with this prediction as well. Fewer escorts will require fewer support vessels.

Number 9: No closures announced so far so Ilm staying with this one. We all know the defence budget is really there to provide revenue to BAe and jobs and has nothing to do with defending the country.

Number 10: Also still alive and kicking as a prediction and in fact she might go earlier if reports of her poor condition are well founded.

Number 11: Staying with this one too.

Sadly, so far my pessimistic predictions have either come true or are still possible with some appearing more likely. Still, make real terms cuts in the defence budget year on year, operate at a tempo well above your planning assumptions, insist in buying overpriced indigenous crap for almost every defence need, continue buying tactical fighters we don't need and treat the defence budget as if it's primary role is civilian job creation and that's what you get I suppose.

Steve
In my opinion these predictions are unfortunately quite realistic and with a escort force of only 19 ships the R,N. will be unable to keep the sea lanes open at any one time unless OPV,s are built to patrol some areas, the number of 60 f 35 fighters to be ordered if this number is correct is totally short as it would result that in war time the 2 carriers will be able to embark a maximum of 20 fighters each as the RAF will neeed a minimum number too, this is a ridiculous number for such a big ships, another possibility is that they decide to maintain only 1 carrier operational and the other in refit/reserve wich would even more ridiculous, to embark in such expensive and big ships an aew platform as a helicopter with a searchwater radar would be a total mistake, later if they decide to retire earlier than expected the LPH ocean and use 1 of the 2 carriers as a multirole ship including the LPH role it woud be the final of the circle, we hope that these predictions are not true because if not the R.N. will be a navy without a credible deterrent and these 2 powerful carriers would be 2 big white elefants.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by spsun100001:

Obviously there's a fair split between pessimists and optimists on this board. Someone made a point in a recent posts about predictions that have been up on the thread since it started.

That got me to thinking about inviting everyone to post their assumptions about the Royal Navy in one post and to make a mental note to come back and take a look at them every 12 months to see whether optimism or pessimism seems to be well founded!

Here's mine

1) The future carriers will be built but will be delayed. To keep the costs down they will have minimal self defence capabilities (such as Phalanx fitted from the retiring Invincible's).

2) The AEW platform will be the Sea King with Searchwater initially with the service lives for these machines extended as long as possible. It will be replaced with ASW Merlins refitted with Searchwater thus reducing the overall number of helicopters in the fleet.

3) The buy for the F35 will be cut to around 60 aircraft replacing the Harrier GR9's roughly 1:1. This will provide enough to deploy around 18 on each of the CV's in normal deployment configuration or a full air wing of 36 for one carrier in combat conditions unless the aircraft are deployed on land based CAS missions.

4) The number of Astute's will be reduced from 8 to 7.

5) The Type 22 Batch 3 frigates will be retired and the 7th and 8th Type 45's will not be ordered. This will reduce the escort force to 19 ships.

6) The Type 45's will remain without a land attack missile, an anti-ship missile and anti-submarine torpedoes. They will not be fitted with the Phalanx CIWS to save costs.

7) The design for the C3 will be fixed with no embarked helicopter (which IMHO means we might as well not even bother to build them as they will be bog all use for nearly all the roles that are required)

8) The number of MARS ships will be reduced to 3 or 4 to reflect the smaller surface fleet that needs to be supported.

9) There will be no dockyard closures. Closed dockyards = jobs lost and safeguarding industrial jobs is a more important priority for the government when it comes to defence spending than anything else.

10) HMS Ocean will be retired when the CV's come into service on the grounds that they can act as LPH platforms.

11) We will firm up the replacement for Trident based on 3 SSBN's. As last time 50% of the funding for these boats will come from the existing procurement budget.

I'd ask you to put your own predictions up rather than just having a pop at mine. You can't prove mine wrong and I can't prove them right. Just put your own views and let's let time show who got it right.

Cheers

Steve
Ok, put me down as a member of the optimists camp...!

1) Ordered and under-armed. Too many jobs depend upon these ships in sensitive constituencies. As QE is unlikely to see service until 2016, we can always hope for additional defence sponsons.

2) If the SeaKings are servicable use them. Would prefer a UAV (Sea[Global]Hawk type aircraft, assuming AESA could be supported within a C4I environment. If not sentry-post the Type-45s.

3) I am assuming that your sixty F-35B will be the Harrier/Jaguar replacements. What about the impending Tornado GR4 retirement? Number could be maintained at ~150 (as the procurement contract is quite long). Who knows, maybe the FAA will test out the Lightning II-B, give up, hand them back to the RAF, and order the C-version in line with the QE's first refit?

4) Reports of long-lead items for 5-7. Would not mind if 7 is scrapped if-and-only-if:

  • Vanguard replacement ordered to replace shipyard work,
  • Revivial of SSK fleet (Type 214 UK version) with funds saved from no. 7, and
  • Design work on sans SSBN SSN begun for 2025 delivery gateway.

5) Type 22 Batch III should be replaced with the C1. Cannot see this happening until PoW delivered in 2016. Would prefer to see multi-role, 9500-tonne Type-45, but will depend on BAe.

6) Type-45 should be pure CVF-AAW escorts. If lead-item Sylver launchers available, then refit class for 64-silos. Torpedo tubes are superfluous. Land-attack to delegate to CVF and SSN within fleet. Phalanx should be fitted though.

7) C3 class should be fitted with helos (Future Lynx's ideal platform). Highly modularised, with basic land-attack and air-defence. Bow-sonar, but able to support towed-array. Should replace fleet escorts in Caribbean, Gulf, Far-East courtesy calls and, eventually, the South Atlantic. Should be able to maintain sea-state commitments for harsh-weather, so a 3,000-tonne vessel, albeit lightly armed (57-mm cannon and Joint-Services SAMs) should suffice as basic platforms. This project is urgent, as the Type-23 are more then adequate to fulfill C2 role for next decade.

8) Proposed six MARS are quite cheap. Would they be cheaper if built in Holland, Poland or S. Korea? Could see a case for 4 16K and 3 10K designs though, the latter supporting the C3 fleet.

9) Dockyard closure will not occur this side of the [2010] General Election. After that, fear for Scotland's bases, regardless of an independence vote.

10) Ocean will be replaced, probably by two, commercially designed units. The RN will need the flexibility to allow littoral assault without risking primary air-assets. Maybe the Indians can build as a few of their Italian-designed Indigenous [sic] Aircraft Carrier. :p:

11) If we are cheap, we will build an enlarged Astute SSBN. Hopefully we will drop the cruise-missle nuclear option, as we don't want to start World-War III. The large BAe design (which is supposed to be cheap to build) is a good option. [More nukes, less ships, but a better balance.]

As most open-source documentation suggests a naval-vessel has a 35% fleet-availability, then - major capital and RFA vessels aside - a tranche of three vessel orders appears to reflect one available unit under normal circumstances. As such I'd like to see:

  • 6 C1 vessels (but expect only 3 ordered initially)
  • 12 C2 vessels (as near one-for-one substitutes for Type-23), and
  • 18 C3 vessels (assuming low-manned, under-armed, but FFNW as light-frigates)

If we are limited to 19 escorts then this would mean 6 Type-45s, 3 C1, 6 C2 and 4 :shudder C3s. If that's the case, we might as well give up the ghost and surrender.... :confused:
 

davros

New Member
10) Ocean will be replaced, probably by two, commercially designed units. The RN will need the flexibility to allow littoral assault without risking primary air-assets. Maybe the Indians can build as a few of their Italian-designed Indigenous [sic] Aircraft Carrier. :p:
There are currently no plans to replace Ocean, The navy began some study s into developing a 20-30,000 ton pair of ships to replace the Ark and Ocean. These plans have been put on hold. Sadly the CVF will be used as a LPH in a secondary role this imo would be very risky, Ocean only cost around £200 million it would be a big mistake to risk a 1billion+ ship in this role.
What i see happening is there will only be enough F-35 to equip 1 CVF while the other CVF will replace Ark as a secondary LPH.
 
There are currently no plans to replace Ocean, The navy began some study s into developing a 20-30,000 ton pair of ships to replace the Ark and Ocean. These plans have been put on hold. Sadly the CVF will be used as a LPH in a secondary role this imo would be very risky, Ocean only cost around £200 million it would be a big mistake to risk a 1billion+ ship in this role.
What i see happening is there will only be enough F-35 to equip 1 CVF while the other CVF will replace Ark as a secondary LPH.
And there is the rub. Why put a £2billion floating-deck anywhere near danger? Carriers are there to assist air-superiority and deep-attack. LPHs are floating commando-bases. If we reduce the Royal Navy to a miniature US-Marines, then build 4 medium LPH-type vessels (on the Spanish or Italian model).

No, these are power-projection vessels. The proposed two LPH-vessels on hold should be built by the next [Conservative] government. If the pair cost less then £1-billion [UK-built] then it is a bargain and an insurance policy.

A further point about the CVF, why do they need to operate at full-strength in peace-time? Sixteen Lightning IIs can keep the operational ability the Royal Navy up to strength, whilst our fixed carriers (UK, Ascenscion, Cypress, Falklands, and Diego Garcia) can allow us to deploy extra units to oour floating carriers on a needs basis. We can also sell training-spaces to the Italians, Spanish, US-Navy/Marines and Australian allies! :cool:
 

davros

New Member
And there is the rub. Why put a £2billion floating-deck anywhere near danger? Carriers are there to assist air-superiority and deep-attack. LPHs are floating commando-bases. If we reduce the Royal Navy to a miniature US-Marines, then build 4 medium LPH-type vessels (on the Spanish or Italian model).

No, these are power-projection vessels. The proposed two LPH-vessels on hold should be built by the next [Conservative] government. If the pair cost less then £1-billion [UK-built] then it is a bargain and an insurance policy.

A further point about the CVF, why do they need to operate at full-strength in peace-time? Sixteen Lightning IIs can keep the operational ability the Royal Navy up to strength, whilst our fixed carriers (UK, Ascenscion, Cypress, Falklands, and Diego Garcia) can allow us to deploy extra units to oour floating carriers on a needs basis. We can also sell training-spaces to the Italians, Spanish, US-Navy/Marines and Australian allies! :cool:
Yeah i agree that the next goverment should try and build 2 new LPH.

I would like to see the CVF equipped with a good proportion of its air group in peace time maybe not full to capacity but say 24+, as for the AEW i would like to have seen a Hawkeye type aircraft but the Seaking AEW will probably be deployed for the first few years of service, better than no AEW i suppose.
 
So finally maybe we will see only 1 carrier operational and the other in refit/reserve or in the LPH role , totally ridiculous for a ship of around 2bn. pounds.
 

Systems Adict

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Yeah i agree that the next government should try and build 2 new LPH.

Why ??


With our amphib / expeditionary forces (e.g. LPD's (Albion & Bulwark) + the 4 LSD(A)'s) why would we need it ??


Albion & Bulwark are capable enough to land Chinook's on their decks, & I've personally posted pics of a Sea king landing on the LSD(A) Mounts Bay. It's fair to say that all 6 of these ships are capable of landing our bread & butter choppers. (Merlin / Sea King / Lynx / Gazelle / Chinook / Longbow Apache / Super Puma)

Add to this the fact that the LPD's / LSD(A)'s while not having Hanger-age, can re-supply a helo. (Hell, even the x2 AO's can do that !)

If needs must, our helo fleet if not based on Ocean, Argus, or a revamped "Invincible" Class CVS could be spread across the carriers & other surface ships, negating a need for a pure LPH.

Would that not be a logical reason why the Ministry HASN'T put the idea of a new build LPH forward , saving some of the precious budget, while not blowing any more of our hard earned Taxes ??


SA



PS

@ Overlander (Post #1836)...

Don't think the bean counters at Whitehall, nor the RN is gonna spend £2B on a carrier, for it not to be operational as such & just to sit about in reserve....


@ spsun100001 (post #1829)...

Your updated response to No. 6 (Phalanx has not appeared on the Type 45's as they have begun trials. I'm prepared to stick with the prediction that none of the capabilities listed will be funded.)


Sorry M8, Absolute BALDERDASH ! - T45 Phalanx fit is FBNW. They'll get fitted when needed, not before ! (i.e. her 1st deployment into harms way (e.g. the Gulf !))
 
Last edited:

riksavage

Banned Member
I see the two new carriers fitting in with current UK amphibious doctrine very nicely thank you, being used as joint LHP / Carriers. In the event that Ocean is unavailable / decommissioned and one of the two Carriers is in refit you will see the serving unit (QE or PW) manned and equipped to suit the role, whether it be CAP or LHP focused.

If you look at the current UK doctrine, the Bay’s, Invincible and Ocean would remain some distance offshore whilst the Albion’s bring in the first wave of troops supported by CAS / Apache, shore bombardment. Once the beachhead is secured the Bay’s will arrive and unload the second wave using maxi-floats. Only at this point are you likely to see the LHP/Carrier come close enough to be seen by the naked eye from the shoreline. The Falklands is a prime example, at no time did you see the Carrier battle group come anywhere near the shore until after the surrender.

Once the UK has the new Carriers the higher command has a multitude of options to play with, they can deploy a healthy mix of F35B’s, Apache and Merlin. Once in theatre the F35B will provide CAP/CAS, the Apache CAS and the Merlin lift having moved to operate from the Bays, whilst the Albion class brings the ground troops ashore using its own indigenous landing-craft.

As for the ships being poorly defended, I can live with the planned fit of 30mm and Phalanx because you will never see one of the new carriers without multiple T45’s in tow. If anything I would like to see the Phalanx upgraded to RAM.
 

davros

New Member
Why ??

With our amphib / expeditionary forces (e.g. LPD's (Albion & Bulwark) + the 4 LSD(A)'s) why would we need it ??

If needs must, our helo fleet if not based on Ocean, Argus, or a revamped "Invincible" Class CVS could be spread across the carriers & other surface ships, negating a need for a pure LPH.

Would that not be a logical reason why the Ministry HASN'T put the idea of a new build LPH forward , saving some of the precious budget, while not blowing any more of our hard earned Taxes ??
Calm down dear, I believe that its risky to use a £2bn pound ship in this role, when you can purchase a LPH to do this job for just £200 million Its just my opinion. I would be more than willing for my taxes to be spent on a pair of LPH and a 3rd CVF 12 type 45 and around 40 frigates but there you go.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
Davros, I'm surprised to see you still around, after Saturday evening. :D

Small point - you can't get an LPH for £200 million, unless maybe you buy the LPH equivalent of Indonesias new Korean budget LPDs (I think good ships for Indonesias needs, BTW - I'm not knocking them). Ocean was underpriced (the shipyard lost money), & it seems to be generally agreed that even so, she was built too cheaply, causing additional post-build costs. Add inflation since she was built, & an equivalent ship, to a desirable standard, & which would allow the builders to make a modest profit, should cost about £400 million if built in the UK now.
 
Top