SAF 3G weapons capabilities

Red

New Member
True, while reserves can be complementary, one cannot lose sight of the core regular fighting group because war is not something we face daily. And daily ops require efficient planning.
I agree. But I do not think it is a problem for the RSN to recruit, say, another 20 or so more men per new ship and add that to the current 62-65 crew on board each corvette.

They might not even need to recruit those additional men as the latter can be sourced from within the RSN or SAF itself.

It is just a matter of resource allocation where they are needed. The old County class LSTs had a crew complement of about 120 men. We had about 6-7 of them before they were retired. The newer 4 Endurance class LPDs are 2-3 times larger at 8500 tons and require about 60 men to operate. The excess manpower is re-deployed elsewhere.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
.... I think air force investment is a priority now. A couple of F-35s sqns would be more ideal an investment to make at this time. At US$200m or S$280m a copy, it won't be cheap. At that price, it might make another squadron of F15s more cost effective.
The F5s have been upgraded with BVR missiles. IMHO purchases of
additional F15SG fighters, may not be the top priority.

My guess for the 2 next major announcements for weapons platforms:

1. SAF's increase in focus on urban warfare that leads to further changes in the structure of SAF's armoured forces.

1.1 This includes additional purchases of MBTs and/or new variants of the BX IFV platforms. See "Thunder Runs: Panacea for Urban Operation?" by MAJ Goh Si Mien for an analysis of US armour operations in 2003 that brought about an early and unexpected end to organised resistance in Baghdad during Operation Iraqi Freedom. (See www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/supplements/LDAC.html)

1.2 Maj Goh states that :"The SAF will need to readjust its fixation on using light forces for urban operations and incorporate in its doctrine the use of advanced armour systems to capture key terrains in urban centres... and we should also examine the kind of armoured platforms that could facilitate the smooth execution of such missions. The second phase would see the Army raising a trial battalion to experiment with the doctrine and equipment. The formation of this Urban (Mechanised) Battalion will be a significant milestone for the SAF’s transformation into a 3rd generation force."

2. Upgrade of the Victory Class to enhance Singapore's ATBM and to ensure that the navy can keep sea lanes of communications open

2.1 Bitzinger in his RSIS commentary "Time for a Pan-Asian Missile Shield?" notes that "the Aster is a true Anti-Tactical Balistic Missile (ATBM)". IMO to more effectively deal with ATBMs Singapore would need improved better missile defence command and control and the next purchase will be in a new land based radar system.

2.2 Dr. Bilveer Singh (See: B. Singh, Sept 2007, "The Military and Small States") said that "Singapore has never and will never believe that it can be isolated from the rest of the world. To survive, Singapore must engage the international community.... What it lacks in physical size, it complements with a wealth of leadership, moral authority and of course, a very healthy bank account... Singapore has contributed... to develop United Nations Conference of the Law of the Sea... to ensure Singapore’s survival which depends heavily on unhindered access through the sea lanes of communications."
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dear All, for a good comparison of the relative military power in Southeast Asia (it might be a bit dated), you may want to see a 2004 article by Andrew Tan on "FORCE MODERNISATION TRENDS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA".

Andrew Tan says:

"Singapore has evidently had the political will and the funds to continue a steady military expansion program that has inexorably enabled Singapore to become the militarily most proficient, even powerful state, in Southeast Asia... Singapore’s airforce is still the subject of continued modernization. The F16C/D Block 52 force already numbers 42, with 20 more on order. The entire A4 Skyhawk and F5E/F jetfighter force will be replaced by up to 48 fourth-generation combat aircraft...

Separately, Singapore has been accorded observer status for the US Joint Strike Fighter program...

Singapore has also started collaboration with Israel over the development of micro-satellites for reconnaissance and surveillance purposes.

Its navy has seen rapid modernization in the past few years. With 6 DCN Lafayette “stealth” frigates... on order, it will soon have a true blue-water capability with which to defend its sealanes of communications. It is buying naval helicopters for both the frigates and the four formidable newly-built Endurance-class landing ship tanks (LSTs)...

The four ex-Swedish submarines will be the subject of a replacement by modern submarines beginning 2005...

The army has introduced the locally built Bionix infantry fighting vehicle (IFV), which will eventually replace the M113 APCs. A recent major purchase has been the Dornier foldable bridge systems from Germany...."
 
Last edited:

Red

New Member
Andrew Tan`s article is a bit dated and some information is not true. Anyway, the F-5 service life ends at about 2013-2014. Hence, there will be a replacement for them(to be announced before 2013). The Asters in thier configuration are only good for short range ballistic missiles. However, there are new developments in the pipeline which, like the Standards, make transiting to a naval ABM system easier. Read more here ; http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/aw/dti0108/index.php?startpage=38

If it is up to me, I would not bother about upgrading the Victory class corvettes since they are expected to be replaced 2015-2020 next decade when they will be about 30(2020) years old. The weapon systems on board the Victory class ships are still top notched; harpoon missiles, barak missiles, torpedoes, etc; and will probably stay that way for a long time relative to other navies in Asean.


Given the time frame to build, test and commission new ships and looking at the way the Formidable frigates are inducted into the navy, I would say construction of replacement ships would take place, perhaps, as early as 2013-2014 onwards. This would allow for a phased induction of the new ships up till 2020-2022.

I am just speculating but this would also allow Singapore Technologies Marine time to build new submarines to replace the old Challengers(before 2013). So, Singapore Technologies Marine would have thier yards occupied till about 2020.

With the completion of the Formidable class frigates, what other naval ships are they going to build? I am sure they have lots of other commercial contracts but I am certain they want to build upon thier competencies in naval ship design and constuction in order to grow and compete with bigger firms. The big contracts will come largely from the RSN.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
I agree with weasel1962. SAF will want to maintain a strategic reserve of the the Skyhawks and F5s (for at least 5 to 10 yrs after the type has been stood down). For the Skyhawks, they were dedicated to a CAS role. I have heard that ST actually proposed that we lease airplanes to Philippines (which included F5s). So I don't think we need to replace all the F5s. In fact, we have been operating F16s for a long time, so we should also have quite a few F16 fighter pilots who have become NSmen (so we need to cater to this strategic reserve gp too)

Keeping a strategic reserve of the older fighters makes sense as we don't need to re-train NSmen fighter pilots(including NS aircrews), who have gone on to maintaining or flying with commercial airlines. To give an idea of size, the air force has almost 7,000 active personnel (22,000 including NSmen).

I think that the air force would want to acquire the F-35 at the right time and at the right price. Their day one focus of any air war is air superiority.

The next area of focus is the role of the air force in an urban environment. See MAJ KWAN KUM WAH's article on the "APPLICATION OF AIRPOWER IN URBAN WARFARE". I quote Maj Kwan below:

"Airpower can be domineering in 3 out of the 4 dimensions, airspace above, land surface and super-surface (rooftops)... In the dimension of airspace, airpower can provide wide area surveillance, uninterrupted C2 and near to real-time targeting...

Targeting is no longer restricted to only fighter platform but best platform for the job... When UAV or UCAV is used extensively for dull, dirty and dangerous missions, we can extrapolate the reduction in combat casualties ... Where airpower can contribute most is the selection of “smarter smart bombs” with sub-munitions aimed to reduce collateral damage such as Lockheed Martin's Low Cost Autonomous Attack System (LOCAAS) system...

Lockheed Martin's LOCAAS may be another solution for operations in urban environment. Similar to CBU97, F16s or F15s can employ this weapon via a tactical missile dispenser (TMD). Each TMD with 16 LOCAAS can be deployed to the area for search and destroy mission...

Although one may argue why ground forces cannot employ similar weapon type such as standoff precision artillery or long-range precision missile systems, the answer is within the sensor-to-shooter cycle. The time for any ground systems to complete the sensor-to-shooter cycle is often longer than airborne systems...

As SAF surge ahead in this transformation to the third generation armed force, we must continue to place importance in developing a sound doctrine that caters to military operations in urban terrain (MOUT)..."
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Thanks for the links weasel1962 and I stand corrected.

BTW have you read Reflections on Operation Blue Orchid (Sea) on Pointer?

Basically, it's about the Navy's various deployment of Endurance class to the gulf and it was written to enrich the growing body of Operations Other Than War (OOTW) knowledge in the SAF.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
In 2003, DSTA announced that it had developed a Fleet Instrumented Sea Training System (FISTS) and had Integrated FISTS with the United States Navy’s (USN) Battle Force Tactical Training system (BFTT) provides the two navies interoperability training capability.

"FISTS is a live war-gaming and instrumentation system adopting the “train as you fight” concept. It enables weapons engagements to be as realistic as in actual warfare... The FISTS also allows the real-time monitoring of forces exercising at sea. The FISTS will form an integral part of our Fleet exercise regime and training curriculum.

FISTS entails the instrumentation of vessels as well as provides shore-based debriefing stations. It also enables the RSN to conduct AAW, i.e. joint RSN-RSAF exercises... The FISTS enables the conduct of simulated engagement of shipboard weapon systems against aircraft with an instant assessment on the effectiveness of their actions."
As I mentioned in my earlier posts, the Formidable frigates are capable of area defence. Mr Teo in his speech has given an idea of the area of influence of this class of ships. This area defence concept is less capable than what the US navy calls cooperative engagement capability (CEC). CEC integrates data from ships, the air wing and the Haweye.

"CEC extracts data from sensors aboard surface ships and aircraft throughout the battle group operating region and displays fire control quality data, to every asset in the battle group... [This] enables all ships to engage.. CEC gives the battle group commander an umbrella to protect all the ships and aircraft in the battle group and extends that umbrella of protection well beyond the outermost sensors of the battle group."
In a speech by Minister for Defence Mr Teo in July 2008, he said the following, in relation to the Formidable Class Frigates capabilities:

"DSTA and DSO were also behind the development of the Combat Management System on board the Navy’s stealth frigates. This is an advanced computer programme that is able to detect, track, identify and prioritise contacts, and assign weapons to engage enemy targets facing the ships. The many sensors and weapons on board the frigates are integrated into this one command and control system. As a result, the decision-making process to fire the ship’s missiles and other weapons is simplified, less time is taken, and a smaller crew is required to man the combat systems. The area of influence is great, tens the times of the size of Singapore."
However, this concept is not new. RSN been attempting to learn from the US navy in this aspect. RSN's C2 systems will be simple in comparison to what the US is capable of, in the case study on Task Force 50. Task Force 50 is indicative of the direction technology will take naval forces in the future.

"TF-50 grew to include 59 ships from Australia, Britain, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, with additional ships from the United States. Though having such a large force was beneficial, it was also challenging...

RADM Zelibor recognized the need for a streamlined method of information sharing... in accordance with the concept of network-centric operations. He sought to utilize several simple, inexpensive... applications that allowed for increased information sharing and collaboration, including a Knowledge Web (KWeb), multiple chat rooms, and CommandNet...
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Singapore belatedly moves to place SAF's tier 1 and tier 2 special forces under one unified command. This integration has been quietly anticipated. For the sake of clarity, I note that the new command does not seem to have dedicated aviation or ISR assets - I believe that aviation & ISR assets will remain with the air force, given our small size.

I'm glad that the Defence Minister has announced this move.

CNA said:
30 June 2009 - The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) is looking at developing a potent, integrated Special Operations Task Force that will have capabilities to counter terrorist threats from land, sky and sea. This will comprise the SAF's special operations forces such as the Commandos and Naval Diving Unit. The chief commando officer will be appointed commander of the Special Operations Task Force, while the commander of the Naval Diving Unit will be the Force's deputy commander...

These were mapped out in an interview with Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Teo Chee Hean on Tuesday ahead of SAF Day which is on Wednesday...

Mr Teo stressed that a key element in the 3G transformation is homeland security, and that's where the new special operations command will help the men work together much more cohesively.

The Defence Minister added: "We develop special units in the Commandos and diving unit for distinct missions but as you can see, many of these capabilities, have much more integrated missions.

“You can go over land, over sea and you have much more integration in all the operations. So the things which you used to do separately, you now do together, a lot of them. So it makes sense to put together the very sophisticated capabilities of these two forces to give them the additional support that they need and this will allow us a good platform to develop their capability further.

"One of the Special Operations Task Force's duties is is counter-terrorism - storming buildings, aircraft, ships and so on. The technologies and techniques of these things evolve quickly. They also have to deal with expanded threats. For example, we may no longer be dealing only with people with guns, but you may be dealing with people with very powerful explosives and various kinds of other substances such as chemical, radiological, etc.

So you need to develop the capability to deal with these things and you'll require quite specialised capabilities. You have to deal with them at sea, at shore, buildings and aeroplanes, on ships, coastlines and so on. So you do need to bring together these capabilities, develop them in a much more complete, coherent manner."
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
The newly created Special Operations Task Force (SOTF) recently participated in Exercise Northstar VII (a large scale anti-terrorist exercise). This year's exercise, simulated the attacks on India's Mumbai city last November, with terrorists launching simultaneous assaults on key public areas. This exercise is designed to enhance the ability of the SAF to deal with more complex terrorist threats that requires multiple agency co-ordination. Fifteen public and private sector organisations are taking part in the exercise this year, including the Defence Ministry, Singapore Civil Defence Force, Maritime and Port Authority, and public transport providers. There are two phases in Exercise Northstar VII. Phase one contained scenarios involving public transport and shopping malls. Phase 2, simulates a hostage situation at a hotel (Rasa Sentosa).

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3WOkZ7vYUY]Ex Northstar VII - Rasa Sentosa[/ame]

As a result of Exercise Northstar, the SOTF has revealed some new gear in an exclusive featured in the "Lianhe Zhaopao" (a local Chinese language newspaper). The details (translated from Chinese) are as follows:

(i) 特勤队配备可调节梯子高度和长度的“斜架梯车”,为执行高楼攻坚任务的士兵提供有效平台。 从美国添购的斜架梯系统,安装在机动性强的越野车上,从最接近地面的车斗架起,而不是车顶,加速兵士登梯,而且更安全。斜架梯可折叠和伸缩,最高点可达9公尺(三楼),能使突击兵快速进入和撤离如A380霸型客机或靠岸船只等目标,更适合对两三层楼高建筑展开攻坚行动。 斜架梯的伸缩可遥控,加强行动的突然性和火力优势。每辆车有两部斜架梯,可独立操作,让士兵可同时对两个不同高度的目标展开行动。

Translated Summary with my comments: The Mobile Adjustable Ramp System (MARS) is a padded ladder system mounted on top of a large all-terrain truck - it's quite a bad ass Decepticon like truck. While the model of the truck is not identified, there is speculation that it looks like a Ford F550 truck. The MARS (which I think, looks like a robot exoskeleton), can be elevated to a height of 9 metres, making it capable of reaching the A380 exits. Therefore, the MARS is an anti-terrorist assault vehicle for the A380 and other structures. The MARS may fold, expand or retract. With a reach of 9 metres, the MARS enables the SOTF assault teams to reach into the 3rd floor of a building from the heavy duty truck. The MARS provides an element of surprise and the fire superiority with a 2-level assault platform that can be controlled remotely. In other words, the SOTF assault team can use the MARS to simultaneously gain access to 2 levels of a building/aircraft in one move.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yugwgPM7UbE]SOTF Exercise[/ame]

(ii) 在海上,特勤队采用16米长,2.8米宽尖头长艇,作为运兵工具,执行海中登船和海面拦截任务,也可充作指挥与控制平台。 由于船身细长,因此机动性高。它由两个40马力的舷外引擎推动,最高航速40节(每小时74公里),急转弯航速可达40节。尖头长艇由导航员、舵手和哨兵操作,可载员10人。船上装备40毫米机关枪和榴弹发射枪。

Translated Summary with my comments: The Very Slender Vessel (VSV) is a 6 metre long and 2.8 metre wide high speed vessel. The VSV can carry SOTF out to sea for interception and can also act as a command and control platform. With two powerful engines and a speed of 40 knots, the VSV's long and slender hull enables exceptional mobility at high speeds. The VSV is operated by a crew of 3 (with a navigator, a helmsman and a [sensor operator]) and can carry 10 passengers. The vessel is equipped with machine guns and 40mm [auto] grenade launchers.​

I would also note that the SAF is following in the foot steps of Britain's SBS who acquired a Very Slender Vessel in 1999. The VSV can go faster than any other ocean-going fast pursuit vessel in the world as it can punch straight through waves rather than go through the top of them.

Please accept my apologies for the rather poor translation. [h/t to CJ and owd33]
 
Last edited:

riksavage

Banned Member
One must assume those helo crews in the training video where restricted to civilian flying constraints. They came in very slow, too high and the fast rope deployment was also painfully slow, no doubt as a result of an over cautious load master, he was waiting to check the fast rope was touching the deck. In a real time situation they would have risked being shot to pieces if they were supposed to be part of an immediate action drill.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
One must assume those helo crews in the training video where restricted to civilian flying constraints. They came in very slow, too high and the fast rope deployment was also painfully slow, no doubt as a result of an over cautious load master, he was waiting to check the fast rope was touching the deck. In a real time situation they would have risked being shot to pieces if they were supposed to be part of an immediate action drill.
BTW, we've had some losses from fast rope a while ago, where we lost a foreign and a local trainee. Hence, you are right about operating under training restrictions - that's the problem with not having your own SOTF dedicated taxi drivers all those years (but now they finally have a joint set up that is just announced). So we've got a long way to go still.

You seem to imply you know the trade. Did you have prior tier 2 training? :)

Shot to pieces? No lah... Did you miss the sniper (providing cover on the Cobri)?
 
Last edited:

riksavage

Banned Member
The whole purpose of fast roping is to dump your team on target ASAP. With a well rehearsed aircrew / assault team this can be done in double quick-time, whether onto a static target or moving vessel.

As soon as the helo flares over the target, the first assaulter should be kicking the rope out and be gone, even before the tip of the rope touches the ground. His colleagues should then be stacking up behind him, using hands only to control decent, no feet (unless you are looking at 100ft or more). You are at your most vulnerable when in the hover, even with the little bird standing off providing sniper cover. All this requires practice. The load master needs to ensure he is not in the way, yet at the same time providing eyes-on for the pilot. The first man at the door should be focusing on the ground waiting for the tap from his team mate, who in turn will be looking for the thumbs up from the loadie. The pilot should already know what length of rope is being used (60, 80 ft) and so have worked out how much height he has to play with.

Worst case scenario you have a knot in the rope, which tends to knock people off and can result in some very nasty ankle / leg injuries. Typically fast roping is used during a 'shit or bust' option, when the covert approach has failed, simply because a helo option will provide warning to the protagonists due to the sound of the rotors - so speed is critical.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
You did not seem to understand my prior question, which I repeat below:

OPSSG said:
Did you have prior tier 2 training?
In case, you didn't understand the above question, let me rephrase below.

Question: Have you ever been inserted by fast rope from a military helicopter?​

BTW, this is not a challenge on authenticity. Rather, I wanted to know if you enjoyed your training and lifestyle back then. :)

The whole purpose of fast roping is to dump your team on target ASAP. With a well rehearsed aircrew / assault team this can be done in double quick-time, whether onto a static target or moving vessel.

As soon as the helo flares over the target, the first assaulter should be kicking the rope out and be gone, even before the tip of the rope touches the ground. His colleagues should then be stacking up behind him, using hands only to control decent, no feet (unless you are looking at 100ft or more). You are at your most vulnerable when in the hover, even with the little bird standing off providing sniper cover. All this requires practice. The load master needs to ensure he is not in the way, yet at the same time providing eyes-on for the pilot. The first man at the door should be focusing on the ground waiting for the tap from his team mate, who in turn will be looking for the thumbs up from the loadie. The pilot should already know what length of rope is being used (60, 80 ft) and so have worked out how much height he has to play with.

Worst case scenario you have a knot in the rope, which tends to knock people off and can result in some very nasty ankle / leg injuries. Typically fast roping is used during a 'shit or bust' option, when the covert approach has failed, simply because a helo option will provide warning to the protagonists due to the sound of the rotors - so speed is critical.
As far as I'm concerned, it is a training exercise and Ex Northstar is a regular event on our training schedule. It's a good opportunity to learn for any planning and/or execution mistakes and take from the exercise, lessons learnt. IMO, learning from 'mistakes' in training is good and that is why exercises are conducted.

In fact, we were very impressed with the learning opportunities that were presented in the Jakarta anti-terrorist exercise (that was conducted prior to our exercise). I'm sure the teams will review in detail their moves in their respective debriefs (on tactical execution issues, which seems to be your concern) and also at the overall exercise debrief.
 
Last edited:

riksavage

Banned Member
You did not seem to understand my prior question, which I repeat below:



In case, you didn't understand the above question, let me rephrase below.

Question: Have you ever been inserted by fast rope from a military helicopter?​
Yes - in both a maritime and land environment
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
1. As I have said to others before, please don't take this casual discussion too seriously. We are here to exchange ideas and learn from one another. Let me detail my thoughts in 10 points, across two posts below:
Nevertheless, it might give us, at least, something to analyze and think about.
2. You may want to read the thread: "Air Power 101 for New Members", as it contains some conceptual information (including the ten principles of war and four roles of air power) and a few simple survival tips that may be useful for new members like you.

3. On the other hand, if you are interested on a conceptual framework that is useful for understanding cycles of urban violence that is applicable to the favelas (home to 11.4 million people or 6% of the population) in a number of Brazilian cities, like Rio de Janeiro, I would suggest that you read up on Richard J. Norton's 2003 Naval War College article, "Feral Cities". A “feral city” is defined by Dr. Norton as:-

"A metropolis with a population of more than a million people in a state the government of which has lost the ability to maintain the rule of law within the city’s boundaries yet remains a functioning actor in the greater international system."​

4. According to David Kilcullen in his 2012 article, "The City as a System", the future environment will be urban, littoral, and connected. The data suggest that this is the environment in which future conflict will occur. This is not a futuristic prediction, but rather a projection of trends that are evident now, and an assessment of their effects on cities as they exist today. The future is hybrid (see Rand's Military Capabilities for Hybrid War: Insights from the Israel Defense Forces in Lebanon and Gaza) and irregular conflict combining elements of crime, urban unrest, insurgency, terrorism, and state-sponsored asymmetric warfare, including Mumbai in India (see Rand's: The Lessons of Mumbai), and the battles that arose from:-

(i) the arrest of Mohamed Farrah Aidid's high-echelon lieutenants at Mogadishu in Somalia;

(ii) the Moro National Liberation Front's mass hostage taking at Zamboanga City in the Philippines; and

(iii) the arrest of Christopher Coke at Tivoli Gardens in Jamaica.​

5. With Rio de Janeiro gearing up to host the 2014 World Cup final and the 2016 Olympics, Brazilian authorities have embarked on a pacification scheme, aimed at permanently occupying select favelas (or slums) and evicting the drug traffickers' private armies. In Operação Choque de Paz (or Operation Shock of Peace), the Brazilian authorities have started a campaign to occupy up to 40 favelas that are crucial to providing security in the conduct of World Cup. In November 2012, it was reported that Batalhão de Operações Policiais Especiais (BOPE: [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAGljlQkjmI"]Elite World Cops - BOPE (Brasil) - Chris Ryan's [M] - YouTube[/nomedia] ) was ordered into Quitanda, a favela, in search of gang members who, they believed, were behind the killing of a police officer that was a member of the UPP (Unidade de Polícia Pacificadora). In response to the attack, the Brazilian authorities sent in BOPE, first in Alemão, where three arrests were made and a stash of drugs and guns uncovered, and then in Quitanda, where another UPP officer was killed. In concept, Brazilian authorities have come up with a new plan to pacify the favelas, where it is hoped that the UPP will prevent the pacified favelas from falling back into the hands of the drug traffickers and vigilante militias, the two main generators of violence inside the slums (see this 2011 Rio Times article, Some Lessons After Rocinha’s “Shock of Peace” for a perspective). UPP has also come to be used as shorthand for the entire programme (see here for some developments). Its success or failure is critical to Rio’s ability to entice all the potential guests to the city for the World Cup and the Olympics. If you are interested in this area, the Small Wars Journal has published a recent interview with Brookings Senior Fellow Vanda Felbab-Brown that deals with the issues related to favelas in Rio de Janeiro, a portion of which is quoted below:-

SWJ: How would you assess Rio’s Pacification Policy (Unidade de Policía Pacíficadora—UPP) program?

VF-B: The verdict on the UPP is still out. The policy is clearly much better than previous violent raids. Its emphasis on community policing and permanent police presence and its socio-economic components make for a very good overall policy design. In its conception, the UPP is an exciting program. However, the UPP has struggled in implementation and some aspects of the program cannot be evaluated for years to come. The handover from the raid takeover forces to the community UPP forces has lagged behind in some of the favelas. Reports of police abuse and retaliatory violent targeting of policemen by gangs persist. UPP’s socio-economic programs have often been cast too narrowly. Job creation takes years to implement.

Bringing formal justice mechanisms, formal courts to the favelas has also dragged behind. A big question is whether the will to persist with the efforts will remain after the Olympics Games and the football World Cup on both the part of the policymakers and Brazil’s taxpayers. But the UPP is a tremendous opportunity: yes, it needs to be tweaked and adjusted in some aspects, but to waste it would be tragic and would sentence Rio’s favelas to crime, poverty, and marginalization for years to come.​
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
I found it really, really interesting to know so much about the SAF. That`s not something we hear about in Brazil, and it gave me (and hopefully, everyone else reading it) a great insight about your armed forces...
6. Are you also aware of the role of Thai and Singaporean military in Timor-Leste? After a UN-sponsored vote for independence in 1999, Timor-Leste (formerly East Timor) was engulfed by conflict — an estimated 75% of the population was displaced and nearly 70% of all buildings, homes, and schools were destroyed by an orchestrated campaign of violence carried out by pro-Jakarta militia groups. This conflict was halted by an international peacekeeping force that led to the transfer of authority to the UN, and the establishment of a UN mission in Timor-Leste. In September 1999, Australia was desperate for an ASEAN partner to deploy into East Timor. Thanks to Dr. Mahathir's prior political stance, Malaysian troops were seen by the locals, Australia, NZ and the US as taking a pro-Indonesian or non-neutral position with regards to events in Timor-Leste (eg. The NY Times reported that Ramos-Horta was opposed to Malaysia being given command of UN troops and that such a move would anger the East Timorese). Thailand was the first ASEAN country to volunteer, followed by Singapore and the Philippines. Thereafter, Thai and Singaporean military and ships deployed in support of the Australia and New Zealand-led international stabilization force were instrumental in maintaining ASEAN's credibility, at a difficult time — with the then Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir casting aspersions on the lead country conducting peace-enforcement operations in East Timor. The SAF deployed to conduct UN peace-enforcement patrols at Cova Lima, in south-western Timor-Leste with a mandate under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. These combat peacekeeping deployments:-

(i) started in May 2001 with 70 Singaporean combat peacekeepers stationed at Cova Lima in Operation Blue Heron. The deployment of this enlarged platoon lasted for a period of one-and-a-half years till November 2002. The conduct of these border patrols, intelligence gathering efforts, and presence of a quick reaction force enabled the SAF to disarm militia-men and criminal elements in their assigned sector, to stop the cycle of violence;

(ii) continued in November 2002. The number of Singaporean combat peacekeepers deployed to Cova Lima was enlarged to a company sized force of a 160 troops as reports of groups terrorizing the villages between the border and Dili grew in number till early 2003. Singapore's combat peacekeeper company was supported by a RSAF helicopter detachment comprising four Huey helicopters, with a Singaporean Major General taking command of UNMISET forces of 3,300 peacekeepers from August 2002 to August 2003. The Singapore combat peacekeepers operated as part of THAIBATT with responsibility for half of the border between West Timor and Timor-Leste — AUSBATT having responsibility for the other half. The increase in numbers and the insertion of Singaporean long-range recce patrols by RSAF Huey helicopters into the jungle to track hostile elements crossing the border was instrumental in stopping the cycle of violence. 17 reservists and 10 full-time National Servicemen (NSFs) were among those who volunteered and were deployed for the combat peacekeeping mission (see the photo exhibition, In the company of Peacekeepers and the ebook); and

(iii) lasted till December 2012 (at a lower level), with the end of the UN mandate. At early stage of the peacekeeping mission under INTERFET, Singapore Navy's 3 LSTs provided up to 50% of all sea-lift to support the UN peacekeeping mission via a continuous ferry service between Darwin and Dili (for details see: 'Strength through Diversity: The Combined Naval Role in Operation Stabilise'). Thereafter, Singapore has consistently provided troops for deployment to Timor-Leste and only ending these small deployments in December 2012.​

7. Singapore's annual defence budget, at about US$9.7 billion have transformed the way the SAF used as a strategic tool in four areas of military engagement, which includes:-

(i) working with other naval powers in the maritime domain in policing the global commons in:-

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uecbDdItsxM"]Defending our Everyday - YouTube[/nomedia]


(a) the Malacca Straits joint patrols with other littoral states (namely, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Singapore) to reduce the incidents of piracy in the region;

(b) Operation Blue Orchid for the seaward defence of Iraq from 2003 to 2008; or

(c) Operation Blue Sapphire in support of CTF-151's counter piracy mandate in the Gulf of Aden;​

(ii) using air power enabled operations in support of Singapore, UN or such other coalition efforts, such as, in Operation Blue Heron (Timor Leste), in Operation Blue Ridge (Afghanistan) and in Operation Crimson Angel (Cambodia), as follows:-

(a) in paragraph 6 (ii) of this post, the use of helicopters to insert long-range recce patrols in Operation Blue Heron is explained;

(b) in Operation Blue Ridge, Singaporean imagery analysts provide a niche ISR capability to aid coalition decision making in RC South. Click here, to learn more about the the deployment of a UAV Task Force to Tarin Kowt, Oruzgan from October 2010 to January 2011. For details see: [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghoKjKEkSrc"]Ep 3: Eagle Eye (Ops Diaries - SAF in Afghanistan) - YouTube[/nomedia]; and

(c) in Operation Crimson Angel, the SAF using air power is able to rescue hundreds of Singaporeans over a 1,000 km away from Singapore. This capability was demonstrated on 9 July 1997, when six flights of C-130 aircraft flew over 1,132 km (611 nautical miles) to evacuate 450 Singaporeans and foreigners out of the Phnom Penh, Cambodia, in the middle of a civil war;​

(iii) integrating operations and intelligence with the inauguration of the SAF's C4I Community, under the command of a two-star rear-admiral (holding the same rank as the three Service Chiefs), holding the dual appointment of Military Intelligence Organisation (MIO) director and chief of the C4I community. Rear-Admiral (two star) Joseph Leong's appointment and promotion to two star, signals the importance of the roles of the MIO director and chief of C4I community. Singapore was the first country in Southeast Asia to uncover the existence of a robust al-Qaeda-linked Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) network. In December 2001, Singapore’s Internal Security Department (ISD) informed Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines and Australia of the existence of JI on their soil. Inter-governmental collaboration at counter-terrorism efforts in Southeast Asia has resulted in a mixed bag of notable successes in stopping JI linked attacks with some prominent failures; and

(iv) returning to their role as military advisers for other armies and governments, if required (including providing institutional trainers for the Afghan Army in the areas of counter-IED training and setting up their school of artillery). Further, as part of the overall commitment to the ADMM-Plus process, Singapore will co-chair the EWG on Counter-Terrorism with Australia in the next cycle of Expert Working Groups from 2014 to 2017. Counter-terrorism planning has seen a sea of change, since 9-11, the 2002 and 2005 Bali bombings, the 2003, 2004 and 2009 Jakarta Hotel/Embassy Bombings, the London 7/7 bomb attacks in 2005, and the November 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks. The special forces of Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand have conducted unilateral, bilateral and multilateral counter-terrorism exercises of greater and greater complexity. Counter-terrorism exercises not only to raise awareness of special forces capabilities in local officials, they also iron-out any chain-of-command issues that may occur, should the need arise. Further, I note that Afghanistan is not the only operational deployment of Singapore's ISR assets. Tentara Nasional Indonesia and the SAF also worked together in hostage rescue operations in West Papua in 1996. An SAF Remotely Piloted Vehicle detachment worked closely with the Indonesian special forces in Timika in West Papua, providing surveillance which proved crucial in facilitating the successful rescue of Indonesian and foreign hostages (from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Germany) taken by the Organisasi Papua Merdeka or Free Papua Movement. The RSAF's then Tactical Air Support Command (now renamed Air Defence and Operations Command) received a campaign streamer for that.​

8. If I may, I would also like to share five additional points on Singapore in Q&A format, written in 2009, to set the greater context for Singapore's defence spending levels.

When I talk about military strategy, I mean the use of military power to achieve political and/or military ends. It is clear from the prior posts that Singapore has some military power. However, our ability to be seen in exercising this power is constrained by current geo-political reality.

Q1: Why is Singapore so reluctant to use military power as a strategy?

Ans: We use the SAF to achieve political ends but usually not to conduct war (because war in of itself is a blunt policy tool). The SAF is usually used by Singapore to win friends and influence other countries (and not to fight with them). An example of the SAF in non-combat roles is all the humanitarian relief deployments (eg. the Dec 2004 Tsunami) or peace support ops. And the SAF contributes to peace support ops too. If we can achieve the same political goal by negotiations or diplomatic efforts:- Why not? Further, the mere presence of the SAF deters potential aggressors from using force. So ironically, the presence of military power, may reduce the necessity of using military power.

Q2: Why does Singapore focus so much attention on air power?

Ans: Singapore lacks strategic depth and our forces cannot retreat from the city into the jungle. Therefore, it is crucial for us to at least maintain air parity, or if possible, win air superiority so that we can protect the city from aerial bombardment and employ our air power to our tactical advantage to enable us to establish local superiority in battles.

Q3: Why build the Singapore navy, when you have air power?

Ans: We are not self sufficient in food (over the long term) and we need trade to ensure that our city does not starve in a naval blockade. It is no good if we can defend Singapore island but cannot import food because of a naval blockage. In fact, just an increase in insurance rates will affect the price of goods imported into Singapore. Being able to defend Singapore island itself is meaningless if we cannot keep our SLOCs open. Further, air power can have a multiplier effect on the RSN's capabilities and gives us a greater choice of tactics in any naval battle.

Q4: Singapore has a strong but small* air force and navy, why do you need an army?

Ans: Because without an army we cannot hold physical ground (we would have to give up the possibility of using forward defence as a potential tactic, if we cannot hold ground) and it would create a force imbalance, that can be easily overcome by a capable aggressor. Further, we are not a true island like NZ or the UK (where they are separated by miles and miles of water), as we are physically connected by 2 land bridges to Malaysia (and therefore physically connected to the rest of mainland Southeast Asia). In WWII, the causeway was demolished by the British but the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) were able to cross it in a few hours and bring over their troops, tanks and supplies. So IMHO, a strong army component is essential in any land battle (keeping in mind that the IJA invaded Singapore by a land route). Our army components include recce elements (like LRRPS), armoured battle groups, infantry, artillery, combat engineers and so on.

Q5. What do you mean when you say that Singapore is capable of hybrid warfare?

Ans: Just as insurgent commandos can set off bombs at Orchard Road and at the former Ambassador Hotel (during the 'Konfrontasi'), conventional armies are capable of unconventional attacks. For example, Operation Rimau carried by the Z Special Unit in WWII. Singapore's own SOF last saw action in the 1991, at the SQ117 hijack (see video on the hostage rescue) and our NDU have undergone deployments in Iraqi waters for the last 5 years. So it is important to understand that the SAF (while it is not designed as a guerrilla warfare organisation) has well trained unconventional forces that will be employed as part of our concept of operations in any battle (which is often called hybrid warfare**). Please remember, that conceptually, the same or similar tactics are available to both the aggressor and the defender. Our investment in training, technology and organization are but tools in an attempt to stack odds in our favour. That is why we don't ever intend to fight fair or only conventionally. So please do not assume that the SAF will cede any area of specific competence to any potential aggressor (like unconventional warfare). While warfare is inherently unpredictable, our army is not small in numbers and our defence of Singapore will be considered, dynamic and robust. Let me end with a quote from Clausewitz:
"Everything in war is very simple, but the simplest thing is difficult... the difficulties accumulate... so that one always falls short of the intended goal... [and this] distinguishes real war from war on paper."​

Footnote:
*Small being a relative concept when compared to regional powers (the RSAF has the best trained and largest combat aircraft fleet amongst the ASEAN countries). The RSN has arguably the most capable naval fleet amongst the ASEAN countries (in terms of force balance).

**Hybrid warfare or swarming are only tactics. Our country's strategy is to live in peace with our neighbours and try to get along with the regional powers, if possible.
9. Doctrinally, the SAF does not intend to defend Singapore at the gates of the city, as it were and is capable and resourced for 'forward defence' of our country. Our thinking on defence is something that is not well understood by casual observers and often leads some misunderstanding. The SAF's declared mission statement is to "enhance Singapore’s peace and security through deterrence and diplomacy, and should these fail, to secure a swift and decisive victory over the aggressor". And I believe the SAF is resourced to carry out the mission statement (see: [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CCnoX9yADc"]The SAF - A Force In Transformation - YouTube[/nomedia]). Further, let me list 7 examples of Singaporeans who have been of service to the nation. In July 2013, the SAF Medal for Distinguished Act was awarded to Second Lieutenant (2LT) Kamalasivam S/O Shanmuganathan, who used his body to protect his recruit and his action averted more serious injury to the recruit during a hand grenade live throwing exercise on 8 March 2013. While 2LT Kamalasivam was only slightly injured in that incident, it is the story of one citizen doing his duty. The SAF Medal for Distinguished Act had previously been awarded to 6 SAF personnel and 1 from the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF):-

(i) Lt. Colonel Toh Boh Kwee, First Warrant Officer (1WO) Mohinder Singh, First Sergeant (1SG) Teo Boon Hong and Lieutenant Leroy Forrester from the NZDF for risking their lives to help injured soldiers immediately after an in-bore explosion of a 155mm artillery round in the barrel of an FH2000 howitzer occurred during a live firing exercise in New Zealand in 1997.

(ii) Lt. Colonel Lo Yong Po for remaining behind in an area that was overrun by insurgents to see to the safe extrication of UN officials after extensive fighting broke out during his participation in UNSMA in 1998.

(iii) Captain (NS) Kok Yin Khong for administering first aid, while exposed to hostile fire, to a UN military observer who was shot by an unidentified gunman in a fire fight, when he was serving in the United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission (UNIKOM) in 1998.

(iv) 2LT Kok Khew Fai for his act of courage to save a recruit's life during a hand grenade live throw exercise in Mar 2008. 2LT Kok threw himself on top of the recruit to shield him from the blast when the explosive slipped from the recruit's hand during the throw and landed on the ground behind them.​

10. As you seem to be interested in the military of other countries, may I suggest that you have a look at the thread: "ASEAN (and ADMM Plus) Military Exercises", which has some pictures and videos embedded on regional military exercises. For context on some of the latest developments in Asia, you can take a look at the discussion in this thread: "US, Japan to establish military bases in the Philippines."

Have fun reading and posting. Cheers.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Btw,why does a tiny Island nation need MBTs? Anyone? There are other ways of countering enemy armour.
In any strategy for defending Singapore, we must embrace apparently contradictory notions (at least on the surface) - as we need to engage difficult partners and yet deter difficult partners at the same time.

Let me repeat what Lee Kuan Yew once said. A small country like Singapore seeks a maximum number of friends, while maintaining the freedom to be itself as a sovereign and independent nation. Both parts of the equation – a maximum number of friends and freedom to be act - are equally important and inter-related. This is why the SAF's mission in furtherance of Singapore's forward defence posture is as follows:-

"To enhance Singapore's peace and security through deterrence and diplomacy, and should these fail, to secure a swift and decisive victory over the aggressor."​

We live in a 3rd world region and we do not delude ourselves in thinking that our neighbours will always act in our country's interest. In fact, conflict promoting agents often hope to retain or gain political power in their own countries. If conflict promoting agents gain power, then many of these agents eventually hope to translate such power into wealth. Less questions are asked and debate is often limited in a time of war or a crisis. The promotion of war or the idea of potential conflict by politicians or generals all over the world (to unite a country under the banner of nationalism or some other rhetoric) against an imagined or real enemy is almost as old as politics itself. This sort of idea is not unique to maritime South East Asia. In fact, the regimes in countries like North Korea and Iran like to promote the idea of ongoing conflict to justify the current regime's hold on power.

The ability to gain or stay in power is good enough reason for irresponsible politicians to promote conflict. It is a matter of historical record.

Between 1962–1966, there was a period of Indonesia-Malaysia confrontation over the future of the island of Borneo. It is called Konfrontasi in Indonesian and Malay. As I previously posted, insurgent Indonesian commandos set off bombs at Orchard Road and various other locations in Singapore during the 'Konfrontasi'. In Singapore alone, there were some 40 bomb attacks over about two years. Most of the targets could by no stretch of the imagination be considered legitimate military objectives. They included schools, hotels, cinemas, bus depots, telephone booths and residences.

While Indonesia-Singapore relations are much improved since that period of the 1960s, it does have its share of problems to be managed. Respected American scholar of Indonesia, the late Dr George McTurnan Kahin, wrote in 1964 while Konfrontasi was still ongoing, that episode of aggression towards its neighbours was the consequence of the "powerful, self-righteous thrust of Indonesian nationalism" and the widespread belief that "because of (the) country's size… it has a moral right to leadership". Time may have given a more sophisticated gloss to this attitude but has not essentially changed it. This attitude lies, for example, behind the outrageous comments by some Indonesian ministers during the haze in June 2013 that Singapore should be grateful for the oxygen Indonesia provides; it is the reason why Indonesians think Singaporeans should take into account their interests and sensitivities without thinking it necessary to reciprocate.

Indonesians, Malaysians and Singaporeans need to understand this -- Singapore (with a population of 5 million and a GDP of US$276.5 billion with a 2012 defence budget of about US$9.7 billion) has no interest in seeing relations with any close neighbour, strained. To give you an idea of the size difference, our immediate neighbours have the following characteristics:-

(i) Indonesia is more a thousand times larger than Singapore in land size (with a population of 242 million and a GDP of US$878.2 billion, with a 2012 defence budget of about US$6.8 billion); and

(ii) Malaysia is more than 470 times larger than Singapore in land size (with a population of 29 million and a GDP of US$303.5 billion, with a 2012 defence budget of about US$4.7 billion).​

I tend to think of Singapore's main battle tanks as a tool for persuasion (in the hard power tool kit of a state that is geographically disadvantaged). They help to persuade any ambitious neighbour that it is not in their interest to engage in overtly hostile acts that we will punish. And we believe that just bombing the capital and bases of an aggressor is not sufficient it itself to persuade the aggressor to cease hostilities. Main battle tanks (MBTs), serving as part of the SAF's ABGs in the Singapore Army Divisions provide military options for our leaders, should the need arise. As our defence minster recently noted, more powerful you are, the less enemies you have - that is why we don't need to think of our neighbours as our enemy - and how they think of us is their choice. On occasion we have been called a 'little red dot', by the Indonesians, which was intended as an insult. Instead of being insulted Singapore retailers now have a range of 'little red dot' merchandise for sale to tourists.

This is also why 'decisive' an important word in the SAF's mission - Singapore's MBTs will move out for war supported by a thousand other armoured vehicles in the first wave. IMO, it is very hard to be decisive in ground warfare without MBTs, as an important node, in the SAF's way of war.
 
Last edited:

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
Reply to Media Query on the LST Upgrades

17 Feb 2015 - In response to a media query on the upgrade programme for the RSN's Landing Ships Tank (LST), Commanding Officer, 191Sqn, Colonel Thng Chee Meng issued the following reply:

The four Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) Endurance-Class Landing Ships Tank (LST) have been in service for more than 10 years. An upgrade programme for the LSTs started in 2013 to extend their operational lifespan. The upgrades will enable the LSTs to better support operational requirements for maritime security and operations other than war. To date, two LSTs (RSS Persistence and RSS Endurance) have been upgraded.

The key upgrades to the LSTs are:

a) Introduction of Combat Management System. The LSTs are equipped with an enhanced combat suite to improve network systems and integration with the rest of the RSN's fleet. The Combat Management System will aid the ship crew in the command and control of the sensor and weapon systems, providing a robust feedback loop for faster tracking of potential maritime threats. With these state-of-the-art data fusion, sense-making and decision support engines, there is increased awareness at the task force level which will allow the LSTs to have better situation awareness and to take quick decisive action.

b) Improved operational planning capability. Over the years, the LSTs have been deployed for a wide range of operations such as peace support operations, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief missions and counter-piracy operations. Through these deployments, it was determined that a dedicated operational planning capability for the task group on board the LST was required.

c) Better support for helicopter operations. Helicopters are typically deployed as part of operations other than war. To better cater for extended deployments of the helicopters out at sea, the hangar is fitted with facilities like an overhead crane and an upgraded Aircraft Ship Integrated Securing and Traversing System (ASIST) to provide comprehensive support and maintenance for helicopter operations.

d) Adoption of environmentally-friendly practices. Stricter environmental codes and standards present a need for the RSN to improve its environmentally-friendly features. In compliance with the Maritime Pollution Convention of which Singapore is a signatory, the garbage disposal system can now better handle larger garbage loads over longer deployments
Singapore, 13 April 2015 -- The Ministry of Defence of Singapore and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA) co-hosted the World Humanitarian Summit (WHS) Global Forum on Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination at the Changi Command and Control Centre in Singapore from 13 to 15 April 2015.

The WHS Global Forum seeks to develop recommendations to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of civil-military coordination in disaster relief responses at the national, regional and international levels. More than 100 policy makers and operational experts from UN agencies, regional organisations and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), as well as defence establishments and national disaster management authorities from more than 25 countries are attending the forum. Speaking at the opening ceremony, Singapore Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen proposed that three broad parameters that should guide military assistance for HADR operations:

"First, militaries should not replicate what civilian organisations can do better. I think that makes a lot of sense. But, we do it all the time. Let me give you a simple example – it makes little financial sense for military aircraft and ships to transport items like blankets and even food from developed countries to areas of need. And that is exactly what we do each time a crisis hits. We spend considerable resources collecting all these civilian items, using expensive military ships and planes to transport them to developing countries. Where just simple money transfers and the purchasing power or wired money could accomplish so much more. And civilian agencies are much more equipped to effect, whether it is the transfer of monies or distribution of essentials to people in their time of need.

Second, militaries should confine themselves to critical windows of need in the immediate aftermath following disasters. The time that civilian agencies need to take to gear up to take over.

And third, even for this scoped intervention, militaries will need to build up information hubs and network with civilian organisations preemptively, if they are to be effective in their immediate responses as well as transit operations to civilian agencies. You need that sense-making to be able to respond in the first critical moments when a crisis hits, but there should be clear plans of how to transit to civilian organisations."​

Also speaking at the opening ceremony, the United Nations Assistant Secretary-General Kyung-wha Kang said

“I am grateful to the Government and people of Singapore, in particular His Excellency Dr. Ng Eng Hen, Minister of Defence, for co-hosting this important gathering with us, and for your ongoing support for the World Humanitarian Summit, which will be convened by the UN Secretary-General in May 2016 in Istanbul to set the agenda for the future of humanitarian action...

This meeting is part of a series of regional and thematic consultations that have been taking place in different places around the globe since mid-2014 in the build-up to the Summit next year... The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs was tasked by the Secretary-General to conduct the summit process. We established a small secretariat to do so, preparing, conducting and follow-up on the various consultations, and now gearing up to synthesize the risk outcomes, which will serve as the basis for the Secretary-General’s own report and recommendations that will be presented at the Summit...

Over the next two days, we will discuss two of the four World Humanitarian Summit themes in which civil-military coordination has a key role to play: Humanitarian Effectiveness and Serving the Needs of People in Conflict.”​

Putting people at the centre drives humanitarian response and depends on the many parts coming together including coordination with the military. “Humanitarian civil-military coordination plays a vital role in the exchange of data, information and knowledge among multiple stakeholders. Military participation is equally critical for successfully establishing a shared situational awareness,” commented Ambassador Toni Frisch, the Chair of the Global Consultative Group on Civil Military Coordination (see the 90 paged March 2008 "Civil-Military Guidelines & Reference for Complex Emergencies", for details). This WHS will help to identify:

(1) how the humanitarian community can work more efficiently and effectively to meet growing and more complex needs with limited resources and by working better together with the diverse actors, including armed forces, involved in humanitarian action in natural disaster response (i.e. Humanitarian Effectiveness); and

(2) the factors that can facilitate the interaction and information sharing in a complex emergency between humanitarian organizations and armed forces (including national militaries, peacekeeping missions and/or armed opposition where necessary), with the aim of ensuring better access and security of humanitarian workers, the proper and coherent use of military assets, and the protection of civilians (i.e. Serving the Needs of People in Conflict).​

At the regional level, Singapore has set up the Information Fusion Centre and the Changi Regional HADR Coordination Centre (RHCC). The former currently hosts International Liaison Officers from 15 countries to collect maritime information and feed them to all their partners, while the latter works closely with key stakeholders like UN OCHA and the ASEAN Coordinating Centre on Humanitarian Assistance (AHA) to enhance civil-military coordination in disaster regions. Moving forward, a series of workshops will be held at the Changi Command and Control Centre. These include the introductory session of the Regional Consultative Group on Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination for Asia and the Pacific, and the biennial ASEAN Regional Forum Disaster Relief Exercise. Further, the RHCC's OPERA Command and Control Information System can take data from a wide range of sources, fuse it together and disseminate it to partner militaries and civilian organisations like OCHA and AHA to enable more effective relief efforts.
In a Facebook post on 19 March 2015, Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said, "It [the Chinooks] will be equipped with a 5,000-litre water bucket from the Singapore Civil Defence Force. Let's support our SAF men and women who are tasked for this mission - that they will do their job well and keep safe."

Video at a Singaporean Chinook with a water bucket at work: http://goo.gl/jwXoc2

According to the Royal Thai Army (RTA) deputy spokesperson Colonel Sirichan Ngathong, relevant authorities mobilised resources to tackle the smog problem. From 18 to 31 March, two Singaporean Chinooks flew 17 sorties over 35 hours and dropped over 200,000L of water before the 50 officers from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) and Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) returned to Singapore.

In September 2005, four Singaporean Chinook helicopters and 41 personnel deployed to Louisiana for Hurricane Katrina relief operations have completed their mission. Together with elements of the Texas Army National Guard (TXArNG) with whom they had worked side by side, these Chinooks flew more than 80 sorties and transported over 800 evacuees and security personnel, and more than 540 tonnes of equipment, humanitarian supplies and sand.

By way of background, in the past, Singapore's Peace Prairie detachment in the US also worked together with the TXArNG on other relief missions in the past, including relief operations in the aftermath of Hurricane Floyd in North Carolina in 1999 and fire-fighting and flood relief operations in Texas in 2000.
From 30 December 2014 to 13 January 2015, 33 members of a SAF-led Task Force comprising personnel from the SAF, Singapore Civil Defence Force and Public Utilities Board, and worked closely with the Malaysian Armed Forces to help purify 136,000 litres of river water into clean drinking water for distribution during the flood relief efforts in Kelantan, Malaysia.

Also in Jaunary 2015, crew members of MV Swift Rescue located the main fuselage of the crashed AirAsia plane (QZ8501) as part of the SAF's deployment to the Java Sea, as part of an international search and locate effort, which comprised more than 400 personnel from the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) and Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF), five RSN ships, two RSAF C-130 aircraft and two RSAF Super Puma helicopters.
 

OPSSG

Super Moderator
Staff member
NajibRazak.com said:
26 April 2015 -- The Malaysian Government is aware that search and rescue operations are still ongoing in Nepal due to the devastating earthquake which hit the country and the Northern India region yesterday. We will be deploying 30 members from the Special Malaysia Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team (SMART) together with the necessary equipment to Nepal in the shortest time possible.

We have also secured the services of 20 medical doctors from our volunteer relief organizations – MERCY Malaysia and the Malaysian Red Crescent Society who will depart alongside the SMART members together with medicines and medical supplies onboard a Royal Malaysian Air Force C130 aircraft. The C130 aircraft will be on standby there to evacuate all Malaysians who are in the region and we will bring them home to Kuala Lumpur safely.

On behalf of Malaysia, I extend my condolences to those who lost their family and friends in the earthquake. Malaysia will continue to provide all possible assistance to Nepal in overcoming this disaster.
According to CNN (posted at 6:54 a.m. ET), the death toll in Nepal's earthquake has jumped to at least 2,263, Nepal Home Affairs spokesman Laxmi Prasad Dhakal said Sunday. Another 4,647 people were reported injured in Nepal, the spokesman said.
<<Changi RHCC’s Initial Assessment of Nepal Earthquake>>


The SAF has activated the Changi Regional HADR Coordination Centre (RHCC) to work with the Nepalese authorities and other agencies to help with rescue and aid efforts. According to Changi RHCC, this earthquake is reported to be the worst in Nepal in 80 years. The earthquake occurred at a depth of 15km, about 29km East-Southeast of Lamjung, an area between the capital Kathmandu and the city of Pokhara. So far, more than 30 aftershocks have occurred, some of them measuring as high as 6.6 on the Richter Scale. With a population of 1.12 million people in Kathmandu within a land area of 50.67km² (roughly the size of Holland-Bukit Timah GRC), Changi RHCC assesses this disaster to be in the highest category.

Apart from Singapore's efforts, the Indian military has dispatched a C-130 and 2 C-17s with a Search & Rescue Team and some relief supplies. Many countries such as China, Pakistan and the United States have offered their assistance too. United Nations OCHA will send its UN Disaster Assessment and Coordination team to assess.

- Ng Eng Hen​
The GoN activated its national emergency operation center and convened a meeting of its Central Natural Disaster Relief Committee (CNDRC) on April 25, according to the ORC in Nepal. The ORC reports that the GoN is deploying small teams of medical staff to Kathmandu hospitals to supplement existing capacity; additional medical teams from Chitwan and Pokhara are traveling to hard-hit Gorkha and Lamjung districts to provide assistance. Preliminary information indicates that hospitals throughout Kathmandu Valley have become overcrowded and medical supplies are nearing depletion. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is preparing to mount an international emergency response to the earthquake. The IFRC is mobilizing resources from its hubs in New Delhi, Kuala Lumpur and Bangkok and is releasing funds from its Disaster Response Emergency Fund to support the initial emergency response. Jagan Chapagain, IFRC Director for Asia Pacific said:
“Roads have been damaged or blocked by landslides and communication lines are down preventing us from reaching local Red Cross branches to get accurate information. We anticipate that there will be considerable destruction and loss of life.”​

The UN Humanitarian Country Team (UNCT) in Nepal held a meeting on the evening of April 25 local time. UNCT members are consolidating information on capacity and supplies for April 26. According to Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), four teams of medical and non-medical MSF staff are scheduled to reach Nepal on April 26 to assist earthquake-affected populations. MSF also plans to send 3,000 kits of emergency relief items. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) plans to dispatch a team from Bangkok to Nepal on April 26. A UN Disaster Assessment and Coordination (UNDAC) team will deploy.
  • USAID/OFDA is deploying a DART to Nepal; the team comprises USAID/OFDA humanitarian specialists and 54 USAR personnel from the Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department. USAID/OFDA has also allocated an initial $1 million for relief organizations in Nepal to address urgent humanitarian needs. In addition, a Washington, D.C.-based RMT is activated and coordinating the USG response to the Nepal earthquake.
  • India reports mobilizing 10 National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) teams to assist with relief efforts in Nepal. An additional five NDRF teams will deploy to earthquake-affected areas within India.
  • China's 68 member search-and-rescue team is expected to arrive in Nepal on April 26.
  • Four Pakistan Air Force aircraft carrying rescue and relief assistance, including a 30-bed mobile hospital, left for earthquake-hit Nepal.
  • The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) are sending 70 experts. The team includes experts from the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Police Agency, and JICA, along with rescuers, search and rescue dog handlers, communication specialists, physicians, and field coordinators.
For details, see this USAid Factsheet #1 and according to UN OCHA data, 1,910 people killed. 6M affected (see: https://t.co/joeFrvhq6v).
Straits Times said:
SAF sends multi-agency disaster relief team to Nepal

26 April 2015 - The Singapore Armed Forces sent a cross-agency disaster relief team to Nepal on Sunday evening, in the wake of a devastating 7.8 magnitude earthquake on Saturday that has racked up a death toll of more than 2,000. Three Republic of Singapore Air Force C-130 aircraft with an advance team of six personnel from the Changi Regional Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) Coordination Centre onboard took off from Paya Lebar Air Base...

The relief team also includes a 69-member Home Team contingent, comprising officers from the Singapore Civil Defence Force's (SCDF) Ops Lionheart team and officers from the Singapore Police Force, including Gurkha officers. Led by Lieutenant-Colonel Alvin Tan, commander of the 3rd SCDF Division, the team - formed by regular officers and NSmen - will support search and rescue and other disaster relief efforts in Nepal.

Two planes departed at 5.30pm, while another was scheduled to depart at 8pm. The total flight time to Nepal is about 9 1/2 hours. The Changi RHCC will assist the Nepalese national disaster management authorities and military with their efforts to coordinate the relief efforts.

...<snip>
See: http://t.co/BSiuNw5QgZ

Two of our C-130s have just taken off from Paya Lebar Air Base, with personnel from the Regional HADR Coordination Centre, Singapore Civil Defence Force's Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team and Singapore Police Force's Disaster Victim Verification Team as well as various equipment, for Nepal to assist in the post-earthquake relief efforts. A third C-130 flight with more personnel is also scheduled later this evening for Nepal.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has despatched a Crisis Response Team (CRT) to Kathmandu, Nepal, to provide consular assistance to Singaporeans. The Team took the first available SilkAir flight to Nepal this morning and has since arrived in Nepal and is based at the Kathmandu International Airport to assist Singaporeans who wish to leave Nepal. In this regard, MFA is coordinating with MINDEF to arrange for Singaporeans to depart via the RSAF aircraft, which are scheduled to arrive in Kathmandu tomorrow. The RSAF aircraft carried the Home Team and SAF contingents supporting search and rescue and other disaster relief efforts in Nepal.
Times of India said:
India swings into action, rushes relief personnel, material to Nepal

26 April 2015 -- India jumped to Nepal's rescue in record time, after a massive earthquake on Saturday flattened large parts of Kathmandu valley and Pokhara leaving a trail of death and destruction...

"We are offering full assistance to Nepal," foreign secretary S Jaishankar told journalists... by Sunday India would have five helicopters in Kathmandu and five in Pokhara for local rescue and airlift operations as well as food distribution...

A major-general, J S Sandhu, from the Army headquarters was also deputed to Nepal on Saturday evening to oversee and coordinate the operations in the Himalayan country. "My primary task is to be the point-person between the Indian armed forces and the Nepalese Army, check out what is required and how the resources and relief material being sent from India are deployed there," he told TOI, just before boarding a C-17 headed for Kathmandu.

The first C-130J Super Hercules, with 40 NDRF personnel and 3.5 tonnes, took off from the Hindon airbase for Kathmandu at 3.55 pm for the 90-minute flight to Kathmandu. It was followed by two C-17 Globemaster and one IL-76 aircraft, with over 250 NDRF personnel, 43 tonnes of relief material, five sniffer dogs and a RAMT (rapid aeromedical team) with medical equipment and 24 doctors and paramedics. Two Mi-17s also left for Nepal from Gorakhpur, but had to return due to bad weather.

Jaishankar said India hopes to do a damage assessment of the area by Sunday, following which New Delhi would dispatch more targeted rescue and rehabilitation assistance. "We also hope tomorrow morning to have specialized engineering teams with rescue equipment going in from Bhatinda," he added.

The Army, too, was keeping two field hospitals and two engineer task-forces on the stand-by for rushing to Nepal, with Army chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag in regular touch with his Nepalese counterpart to extend any help to the Himalayan country. Jaishankar said, "As soon as the earthquake happened, our embassy got in touch with the Government of Nepal and we also, the Ministry of External affairs, were in touch with the embassy of Nepal."

...<snip>

See: http://bit.ly/1DxJMiV
 
Top