RAAF force enhancements

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
adsH said:
i think lesser does not mean less in capability what i have read about this Awac and the swedish Awacs is that they are minimizing Operation console's where they have allocated most of the Petty tasks to the computer and the rest to the Few operators who can now carry out a variety of task when they are aided by the on bord computer system they have Multiple windows like environment too shirk enlarge screens so they are in no way less in operational capacity.
Smaller can mean more efficient. eg Some of the the combat room functionality in the RAN Collins Class submarine has been "picked" up by the USN and is now used in the new SeaWolf class. The revised combat room does a number of tasks with less operators.
 

adsH

New Member
Exactly Gf it huamn Nature its better to have one screen that is Big enough where you have everything where you can personilze it your own requirments where you can flick a buton and get those relevant Windows up and running, this old idea of haveing confusing multiple screen is a harder concept and requires a good concentration span and alot of training to be efficentat it. The GUI work is the work of Artists in computers Graphical user interface deigners produce Human computer Interfaces that are more efficent and less confuseing and less harder to work onn!! oh and provide the same or more Efficent use of the system. peferably with less burden on the system
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #23
I agree, however persons from the RAAF when talking about Wedgetail have stated that it will only be capable of controlling significantly smaller numbers of aircraft than E-3. Though at what range is obviously a closely held secret...
 

Pathfinder-X

Tribal Warlord
Verified Defense Pro
Aussie Digger said:
I agree, however persons from the RAAF when talking about Wedgetail have stated that it will only be capable of controlling significantly smaller numbers of aircraft than E-3. Though at what range is obviously a closely held secret...
it wasn't designed to be more capable than the latest E-3, it's designed to fit the needs of RAAF, and it has more than enough capability to do so. the system is the newest in the world(although not most capable), and can give RAAF a great boost in combat capability.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #25
I thought I'd continue this thread and continue to outline new projects and capabilities the RAAF will receive as they are announced. This relates to new simulators for Australia's F/A-18 pilots.

ADVANCED F/A-18 HORNET SIMULATORS FOR THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE

Raytheon Australia has been selected to supply three new F/A-18 Hornet flight simulators for the Royal Australian Air Force, Defence Minister Robert Hill announced today.

The $74 million contract for acquisition and support of the simulators will significantly improve pilot training in the use of the new weapons and systems being acquired for our fleet of fighter aircraft.

Two simulators and a debrief facility will be located at RAAF Base Williamtown in New South Wales, the home of the Hornet fleet, and one new Hornet simulator and debrief facility will be located at Tindal in the Northern Territory. Raytheon will also be contracted to provide full in-service support and this will create a moderate number of new jobs at both Williamtown and Tindal.

The simulators are manufactured by L3 Communications Link Simulation and Training and are based on the latest production Hornet simulators being provided to the United States Navy and Canadian Forces.

"The simulators will improve training for pilots by allowing them to conduct basic conversion training to adapt their skills from other aircraft to the Hornet through to full advanced tactical training," Senator Hill said.

"The computer simulated combat environment will provide pilots with the opportunity to practice their skills in air-to-air combat and intercepts, bombing and formation flying.

"The technology will allow individual and multiple pilot training with simulated friendly and hostile aircraft.

"The simulators will represent another key element of a modern, networked Defence Force. They can be linked so that pilots in Williamtown and Tindal will be able to engage in mock battles and other tactical training. In time they will be able to conduct combined simulated training missions with other ADF assets, such as the Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft.

"They will then be able to replay their missions in the debrief facility so they can go over what they did right and learn from their mistakes."

Senator Hill said the new simulators would ensure that the RAAF’s combat aircrew – already its most potent asset – maintained their edge into the future.

Pilots will start training on the new simulators from mid 2006.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Just to give an idea of scale and distance - the distance between RAAF Williamstown and RAAF Tindal is probably in the order of 2000k's
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #27
I guess they'll have a broadband link between Tindal and Williamtown for the simulators then eh? I'd imagine there would be quite a bit of data to exchange...
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #28
Here's the actual details of the RAAF's new F/A-18 simulators.

L-3 Awarded $26.4 M for RAAF F/A-18 Training System Program


(Source: L-3 Communications; issued June 16, 2004)


NEW YORK --- L-3 Communications today announced that its Link Simulation and Training (Link) division has been awarded a $26.4 million contract by Raytheon Australia to provide training equipment for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) F/A-18 Hornet Aircrew Training System (HACTS).

Raytheon and Link will provide the RAAF with a High Level Architecture, networked training system that will support F/A-18 pilot training. Raytheon will provide overall program management and in-service support at two RAAF bases during the life of the F/A-18 HACTS program.

Link will supply the F/A-18 HACTS program with high fidelity simulators that will support both individual and team training. This modern training system will be an evolutionary leap forward in the RAAF’s F/A-18 training realism and combat readiness.

“This important award allows Link to retain its global presence in F/A-18 simulation and continue its expansion as the leading global provider of distributed mission training systems,†said David Love, vice president of business development for Link Simulation and Training. “We look forward to delivering an advanced, networked training solution that supports the Commomwealth’s long-term Hornet training requirements.â€

The HACTS will include three high fidelity, Link-built F/A-18 Tactical Operational Flight Trainers (TOFTs) that can be networked to form an interoperable, synthetic battlespace. The first F/A-18 TOFTs will be integrated with Link’s SimuSphere visual display. The scalable SimuSphere visual display will be integrated on one F/A-18 TOFT in a nine-panel, 360 field-of-view configuration. The other two F/A-18 TOFTs will be integrated with seven-panel SimuSphere displays that will provide the pilot with a 300 horizontal x 130 vertical field-of-view. Link’s SimuView(TM) personal computer image generation system will power both out-the-window imagery and cockpit sensor display systems.

The HACTS is being procured under the RAAF Hornet Upgrade Phase 2 program and is envisioned to support the entire RAAF F/A-18 training continuum. The F/A-18 TOFTs will reinforce a full range of pilot warfighting skills across both air-to-air and air-to-ground mission areas. In addition, each Link TOFT will be integrated with a Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) training system. This program marks the first ever integration of a JHMCS training capability into a near-eye-relief visual system. The JHMCS, to be deployed on the RAAF’s upgraded F/A-18 fleet, gives the pilot a targeting system that can be used to control sensors and weapons through pilot visual cueing.

Australia has followed the United States and Canada in recently choosing the Link F/A-18 training system solution. This global commonality will provide a significant life cycle cost benefit to all of Link’s F/A-18 customers, while further supporting rapid development and maintenance of simulation systems common with actual aircraft configurations.

Link Simulation and Training is a systems integration organization that delivers and supports training systems and equipment designed to enhance operational proficiency. Link’s services include conducting front end analysis, simulator design and production, and field support. Link has its headquarters operation in Arlington, TX and other key bases of operation in Binghamton, NY, Orlando, FL, Broken Arrow, OK, and Phoenix, AZ.

Headquartered in New York City, L-3 Communications is a leading provider of Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) systems and products, secure communications systems, aircraft modernization, training and government services, and is a merchant supplier of a broad array of high technology products. Its customers include the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, selected U.S. government intelligence agencies and aerospace prime contractors.

-ends-

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2004/Jun/1049245.htm
[Link fixed]
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #29
Here's a new announcement for further upgrades to the RAAF's F/A-18 Fleet.

F/A-18 HORNET STRIKE CAPABILITY TO GET MAJOR BOOST



Australia’s F/A-18 Hornet fighter aircraft will be equipped with state-of-the-art target designation systems, under a project worth more than $100 million that was approved by the Government today.

Defence Minister Robert Hill said the systems were a vital part of the Hornet’s weapons suite.

"The target designation systems will improve the detection, identification, precision targeting and damage assessment phases of F/A-18 strike and offensive air support operations," Senator Hill said.

"This means the aircraft will be better equipped to detect and attack targets by day or night, increasing their operational effectiveness and reducing risk to aircraft and crew."

The project will equip the Hornets with a proven, self-contained, current generation targeting and laser designation system – upgrading the current Nite Hawk Forward Looking Infra-red pod with state-of-the-art technology.

Defence will assess three systems: the Advanced Targeting Forward Looking Infra-Red (ATFLIR) pod manufactured by Raytheon, the Pantera pod manufactured by Lockheed Martin, and the Litening AT pod manufactured by RAFAEL and Northrop Grumman.

"The pods produce an image of the target area (similar to a black and white television picture) on a screen in the cockpit. The pilot is able to use this image to exactly designate the desired target, to maximise accuracy and minimise collateral damage. The pods also include a laser system, allowing for the employment of precision laser guided bombs."

Senator Hill said Defence would release a restricted Request for Tender to the makers of suitable target designation systems. After assessment of the responses, a decision on the preferred replacement will be made next year. The first squadron is expected to be equipped with the new system by early 2007.

"This project is one of a number of planned upgrades to the Hornet aircraft that will ensure the potent strike capability of our fighter fleet," Senator Hill said.


The Pantera pod is the "international" version of the Sniper XR targeting pod, selected for USAF F-16's and F-15E's. I personally hope the ATFLIR pod is chosen based on my knowledge of these systems, but any of these 3 will be a major step forward for ou F/A-18's as the Minister correctly noted... Cheers.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #30
Our F/A-18's are already very good. Projects like this one will keep improving their capability massively...

SaabTech Receives Order for Test and Trial of BOL Countermeasures Dispensing System for the Australian Air Force’s F-18s


(Source: Saab AB; issued July 20, 2004)


The Commonwealth of Australia has awarded SaabTech an order for adaptation and flight trials of the BOL Countermeasure Dispensing System for the Royal Australian Air Force’s F/A-18 Hornet.

"We are proud to be selected to be evaluated on the Australian Air Force’s F/A-18 fighters. The order shows that the BOL system is a world leading product well-established in the field of self-protection internationally," says SaabTech’s president Björn Erman.

The Australian Air Force will be the first customer to evaluate BOL on the F/A-18. The test and trial contract, that is valued at 16,5 MSEK (approx 2,2 MUSD), opens up for later manufacturing programs.

SaabTech will support RAAF flight trials scheduled for the 4th quarter of 2004. The trial is part of the Hornet Upgrade Program phase 2.3, which is an improvement to the aircraft's Electronic Warfare Self Protection. This program is believed to be the largest fighter aircraft improvement project in the world today. A successful trial may be followed by a production order for equipping an undisclosed number of F/A-18s with BOL dispensers.

The configuration for the F/A-18s is four BOLs per aircraft, comprising two conformal mountings on weapon pylons. This number of dispensers will dramatically increase the amount of expendables carried by each aircraft, and so lead to improved survivability against a variety of missile threats.

The Melbourne-based company Aerostructures has been contracted for the development of the pylon modification kit.

The BOL system from Saab is an Advanced Countermeasures Dispenser with proven superior performance. It holds 160 chaff/flare packages, up to five times more than conventional dispensers. Placed out on the wings, vortices will greatly improve dispersion and provide the rapid blooming rate essential to breaking radar locks and, in pre-emptive mode, deny acquisition of IR-seekers.

The system is in operational service on US Navy’s F-14 Tomcat, UK Harrier GR7 and Tornado, and USAir Force’s/Air National Guard’s F-15 Eagle. The system is currently in production for US Air Force’s/Air National Guard’s F-15 Eagle, EF-2000 Typhoon and the Swedish JAS-39 Gripen.

SaabTech is a leading supplier of Avionics and Electronic Warfare Systems on the international market, and a principal supplier to the Gripen fighter. SaabTech is a member of the Saab Group, one of the world’s leading high-technology companies, with its main operations focusing on defence, aviation and space. The group covers a broad spectrum of competence and capabilities in systems integration.
 

umair

Peace Enforcer
The hornet is a good fighter AD.But still I'd always preffer a Viper over it in any role ;) eg in the air-ground role the Falcon has a higher absolute weapons load(even higher than the super hornet) for the same combat radius.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #33
The RAAF evaluated F-16's against F/A-18's and F-15's. F-15's weren't chosen as they were too "expensive" and it was thought they wouldn't last in production (how many F/A-18 A/B/C/D's are being made these days?). They chose the F/A-18 (obviously) over the Falcon, due to it's twin engine design (much safer over water, very appropriate for Australia's strategic environment) and a greater strike capability for the Hornet over the Falcon. The Falcons for instance do not possess a maritime strike capability (though one could be added easily enough) and the Falcon was considered inferior in air to air by the RAAF. The Falcon was cheaper though, and much more money has been poured into the development of the F-16. The F-18's were a good choice for the RAAF though, who have been happy with their performance.
 

umair

Peace Enforcer
That inferiority may have been due to the fact that although the Falcon A/B could easily carry BVR aams, the USAF did'nt mate them with such weapons untill the block-15S(PAF version) and the C/Ds came onto the scene.Besides AD I read sometime ago in a book written by Bill Gunston that there is no concrete evidence to show that twin engined platforms confer greater safety than single engined platforms.He discounted this notion as just a myth.Anhoo you guys know whats best for your selves and RAAF.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
umair said:
That inferiority may have been due to the fact that although the Falcon A/B could easily carry BVR aams, the USAF did'nt mate them with such weapons untill the block-15S(PAF version) and the C/Ds came onto the scene.Besides AD I read sometime ago in a book written by Bill Gunston that there is no concrete evidence to show that twin engined platforms confer greater safety than single engined platforms.He discounted this notion as just a myth.Anhoo you guys know whats best for your selves and RAAF.
Umair, the issue of dual engines was because of redundancy.. At the time (and it's still relevant wrt to long range passenger jets) the feeling was that the loss of one engine would not risk the aircraft completely if it was compromised.

Thrust/power to weight ratios were better with twins than with singles - which is still a trend even with the Russians. Probably the other relevant common denominator is that those countries with huge geographical differences (US, Russia, Canada, Australia and China) all prefer twins for long range strike. There is still a preference for long range autonomous aircraft due to our geographical makeup and the fact that singles can't carry the same loadout the same distance without AAR. It's more of a depth of capability issue.

I'd still rather be in a plane with twins than a single. Having been in an aircraft where one engine "let go", I was more than greatful that we had another one to get us home. Maybe it's my IT background as well, but the MILSPEC and IT industries have a common denominator with respect to the issue of redundancy. ;)
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #36
JP 129: Release of Request For Tender (RFT)


(Source: Australian Defence Materiel Organisation; issued July 28, 2004; edited version)


The Project Office released the Request for Tender (RFT) for formal solicitation on 28 July 2004.

Interested companies should contact the Project Office via facsimile only (see contact details) to register a request to receive a copy of the Request for Tender (RFT). Requests are to be received no later than 27 August 2004. Requests received after this date will not be actioned by the Project Office. Requests are to include details of the mailing address to which the RFT documentation is to be sent. CD ROMs containing the RFT documentation in DOORS 7.1 format will be despatched within two working days of receipt of requests. Industry should note that only those companies with an Australian national facilities and information systems security clearance of RESTRICTED or higher, will be provided with the full suite of documentation.

The closing date for the reception of Tenders is 12 Noon 23 November 2004. Tenders are to be delivered to the address contained in the RFT documentation.

The RFT was developed using the ASDEFCON Strategic Materiel and Support Templates. The RFT has been issued for formal solicitation using the requirement management tool DOORS Version 7.1. Tenderers will be required to respond in this format and failure to do so may result in a tender being deemed non-compliant.


INDUSTRY BRIEFING

A project Industry Briefing will be held in Canberra from 0900h to 1200h on 25 August 2004 and pre-booked individual company briefings, addressing specific aspects of the RFT, will be held on 25 August through to 27 August 2004. Registration for the Industry Briefing and the booking of individual meetings is to be completed through the Project Office via facsimile only no later than18 August 2004. All requests for individual meetings are to be accompanied by a list of questions to be addressed at the meeting. Further details on the briefings are outlined in the RFT Conditions of Tender


BACKGROUND:

JP129 seeks to acquire a Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (TUAV) system capable of providing airborne surveillance, reconnaissance and target acquisition to support land operations. The lack of this level of capability is currently recognised as a significant deficiency in Australia's national surveillance architecture, particularly for land and littoral operations.

The Defence Capability Plan (pages 73-4) states that the ADF will acquire TUAVs with an expected in-service date of 2008 to 2010. Estimated total project budget for JP129 Phase 2 is $A100 to $150 million.

Phase 1
JP129 Phase 1 was a Risk Mitigation Phase that assisted Capability Staff in providing options for systems representative of a mature surveillance system. Additionally, it sought to develop the JP129 concept and mitigate the technical and financial acquisition risks.
JP129 Phase 1 was completed late in 2001.

Phase 2 Objectives
Under Phase 2 the ADF intends to acquire a TUAV system to enhance the reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities of deployed land forces, by overcoming the limitations of mobility, terrain and range experienced by current capabilities. The system will fill capability gaps identified in Army’s current Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) architecture by providing:
a) Near Real Time (NRT) reconnaissance capability for a deployed Joint Task Force;
b) an integral, responsive and accurate target acquisition system capable of providing a NRT sensor-to-decider-to-response asset link; and
c) Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) capability.

The system acquired will consist of air vehicles fitted with sensor payloads, a ground segment to provide control and exploitation functions, and elements for maintenance and logistics support. The TUAV system elements are to be structured around the establishment of, and supply of capability to, three operational troops and a training element.


ACQUISITION STRATEGY
The Commonwealth is intending to acquire a mature TUAV system from an open tender selection process based on the most recent Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines, including the application of Defence acquisition reform strategies. At this stage JP129 will acquire non-developmental systems based on proven designs.
The JP129 Acquisition Strategy was approved by USDM on 20 December 2002.


AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRY INVOLVEMENT
Australian Industry Involvement (AII) is an important initiative within the Defence Materiel Organisation that aims to maximise opportunities for local industry.

The following elements of JP129 have been identified as possible AII target activities:

--Image analysis and mission planning software.
--Sensor information database management.
--Development of air to ground datalinking infrastructure.
--Integration of sensors and avionics into air vehicles.
--Through Life Support.


SCHEDULE
The major milestones of the current JP129 schedule are identified below. The schedule information currently available may undergo significant change throughout the project’s life. A more robust and definite schedule will be developed after the receipt of tender responses.

--RFT Release: 28 July 2004
--Industry Brief: 25 August 2004
--Tenders Close: 23 November 2004
--Evaluation complete: May/June 2005
--Second Pass Approval from Government: Late 2005
--Preferred Tenderer Announced: Late 2005
--Contract Signature: Early 2006
--In Service Date: Latter half of 2008

-ends-
Obtained from:

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cg....1092028767.QRcJX8Oa9dUAABm2XOM&modele=jdc_34

The Australian Army will probably get the Shadow 200 I reckon...
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #37
WORLD’S MOST MODERN MISSILES GIVE HORNETS A NEW STING

Australia’s F/A-18 Hornet fighter aircraft are now equipped with the world’s most modern missile capability following the introduction into service of the Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missile, Defence Minister Robert Hill announced today.

Senator Hill made the announcement at a special ceremony at RAAF Williamtown attended by the Member for Paterson, Bob Baldwin, Chief of the Air Force Angus Houston, Steve Wadey, managing director of ASRAAM manufacturer MBDA UK Ltd, and other RAAF and industry representatives.

"The Howard Government has invested $488 million to provide the Hornets with leading edge state-of-the art missile technology and capability," Senator Hill said.

"The ASRAAM is a short range heat-seeking missile capable of tracking and intercepting airborne targets. It has a significantly greater range than the Sidewinder missiles which it will replace.

"Combined with the Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile, which has an all-weather, beyond visual range ability to hit low-altitude targets, and supported by the APG-73 radar fitted under the Hornet upgrade program, the F/A-18s now have the world’s most modern missile capability."

ASRAAM was accepted for service in July following successful test firings at Jervis Bay Air Weapons Range earlier this year.

Senator Hill said that in addition to providing a capability boost for the Air Force, the project had delivered benefits to Australian industry and technology.

"RAAF personnel at Williamtown will be trained to handle the aircraft fitment and flight line support of the new missiles. These new skills will complement the significant Hornet support base which has already been established in the Hunter region," Senator Hill said.

"In addition, software support and deeper maintenance facilities are being established in Adelaide. These new facilities will inject some $20 million over the next six years into the South Australian economy and have the potential to create extra high-technology jobs at BAE Systems.

"As with many of today’s complex systems, software is a major portion of the missile’s capability. The software support facility, to be located at the Defence Science Technology Organisation at Edinburgh, will allow Australia to improve the ASRAAM software in response to the ADF’s specific requirements.

"The deeper maintenance capability will be established at BAE Systems at Edinburgh Park to ensure that Australians conduct missile maintenance in Australia."

Senator Hill said the ASRAAM project had resulted in closer ties between the ADF and the UK Ministry of Defence as the missile is already in service with the Royal Air Force, and was used on their Tornado aircraft during the Iraq conflict.

From www.defence.gov.au
 

DRUB

New Member
gf0012-aust said:
umair said:
That inferiority may have been due to the fact that although the Falcon A/B could easily carry BVR aams, the USAF did'nt mate them with such weapons untill the block-15S(PAF version) and the C/Ds came onto the scene.Besides AD I read sometime ago in a book written by Bill Gunston that there is no concrete evidence to show that twin engined platforms confer greater safety than single engined platforms.He discounted this notion as just a myth.Anhoo you guys know whats best for your selves and RAAF.
Umair, the issue of dual engines was because of redundancy.. At the time (and it's still relevant wrt to long range passenger jets) the feeling was that the loss of one engine would not risk the aircraft completely if it was compromised.

Thrust/power to weight ratios were better with twins than with singles - which is still a trend even with the Russians. Probably the other relevant common denominator is that those countries with huge geographical differences (US, Russia, Canada, Australia and China) all prefer twins for long range strike. There is still a preference for long range autonomous aircraft due to our geographical makeup and the fact that singles can't carry the same loadout the same distance without AAR. It's more of a depth of capability issue.

I'd still rather be in a plane with twins than a single. Having been in an aircraft where one engine "let go", I was more than greatful that we had another one to get us home. Maybe it's my IT background as well, but the MILSPEC and IT industries have a common denominator with respect to the issue of redundancy. ;)
Sorry to divert the thread, but the fact that the JSF is a single, would it then be accurate to assume that the JSF is far better then the other options Oz is faced with when replacing the hornets?
 

tatra

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
Just watched the video footage of Wedgetail. Does anybody know the thingy is that the aircraft is dragging behind it from the top of the vertical stabilizer? Also, what's the little gizmo mounted at the rear of the hull belog the tail?
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
DRUB said:
Sorry to divert the thread, but the fact that the JSF is a single, would it then be accurate to assume that the JSF is far better then the other options Oz is faced with when replacing the hornets?
DRUB, I don't think that there is an easy answer to that. Mostly because IMHO the issue of selection has been greatly influenced by political demands than would normally be considered.

My feeling has always been that under different circumstances we would have had a different platform mix and that part of that Hi-Lo mix would have seen the use of large twin engined solutions for interdiction and strike.

I am not that much of an advocate, and are yet to be convinced that a single fixed wing combat platform is available that can fulfill all of the roles of strike, interdiction, stand off, CAP etc at a competent and persistent level. But, I'm also one who believes that frontline combat elements are better served by having a manufacturer mix so as to also reduce dependancies and commercial vulnerabilities on the purchaser.

Some of the issues of range, assisted ferry etc are resolved by having organic fueling, but I still believe in having high unassisted autonomy in worst case scenarios.
 
Top