The Russians have always been highly regarded and respected for their missile developments. AFAIK The S-300 has a longer range, so it's a bit hard to do a direct comparison.Awang se said:I not really fancy making comparison like this but i need to know. I've heard that S-300 is a better long range AD platform than their american counterpart, the Patriot. Is it true? or just a rumors spread by anti US group?
Combat tested in numerous nations all arab countries have them in operation with alot of them just recently updated. couple them up with the rest of intigrated system defense i think Patriots are the better !! i like the fact that the US works with numerous nations as allies with each one distinctively participating on certain projects which give rise to specialization without over burdening a nations resources!!Pathfinder-X said:S-300 sounds better on paper, longer range and better homing, but then again it has no involvement in combat while the patriot is a combat tested system.
yes it does, the original S-300 has limited anti-ballistic ability. the S-300V is a system develop from the original to specifically counter ballistic missiles.Aussie Digger said:Does th S-300 possess any specific Anti-Ballistic missile capability? Patriot Advanced Capability 3 seems to possess a good capability, much better than original Patriot at any rate...