NSA Access Into Windows

Panzer

New Member
How NSA Access Was Built Into Windows
by Mortose-Mortland

A CARELESS mistake by Microsoft programmers has revealed that special access codes prepared by the US National Security Agency have been secretly built into Windows. The NSA access system is built into every version of the Windows operating system now in use, except early releases of Windows 95 (and its predecessors). The discovery comes close on the heels of the revelations earlier this year that another US software giant, Lotus, had built an NSA "help information" trapdoor into its Notes system, and that security functions on other software systems had been deliberately crippled.

The first discovery of the new NSA access system was made two years ago by British researcher Dr Nicko van Someren. But it was only a few weeks ago when a second researcher rediscovered the access system. With it, he found the evidence linking it to NSA.

Computer security specialists have been aware for two years that unusual features are contained inside a standard Windows software "driver" used for security and encryption functions. The driver, called ADVAPI.DLL, enables and controls a range of security functions. If you use Windows, you will find it in the C:\Windows\system directory of your computer.

ADVAPI.DLL works closely with Microsoft Internet Explorer, but will only run crypographic functions that the US governments allows Microsoft to export. That information is bad enough news, from a European point of view. Now, it turns out that ADVAPI will run special programmes inserted and controlled by NSA. As yet, no-one knows what these programmes are, or what they do.

Dr Nicko van Someren reported at last year's Crypto 98 conference that he had disassembled the ADVADPI driver. He found it contained two different keys. One was used by Microsoft to control the cryptographic functions enabled in Windows, in compliance with US export regulations. But the reason for building in a second key, or who owned it, remained a mystery.

A second key

Two weeks ago, a US security company came up with conclusive evidence that the second key belongs to NSA. Like Dr van Someren, Andrew Fernandez, chief scientist with Cryptonym of Morrisville, North Carolina, had been probing the presence and significance of the two keys. Then he checked the latest Service Pack release for Windows NT4, Service Pack 5. He found that Microsoft's developers had failed to remove or "strip" the debugging symbols used to test this software before they released it. Inside the code were the labels for the two keys. One was called "KEY". The other was called "NSAKEY".

Fernandes reported his re-discovery of the two CAPI keys, and their secret meaning, to "Advances in Cryptology, Crypto'99" conference held in Santa Barbara. According to those present at the conference, Windows developers attending the conference did not deny that the "NSA" key was built into their software. But they refused to talk about what the key did, or why it had been put there without users' knowledge.

A third key?!

But according to two witnesses attending the conference, even Microsoft's top crypto programmers were astonished to learn that the version of ADVAPI.DLL shipping with Windows 2000 contains not two, but three keys. Brian LaMachia, head of CAPI development at Microsoft was "stunned" to learn of these discoveries, by outsiders. The latest discovery by Dr van Someren is based on advanced search methods which test and report on the "entropy" of programming code.

Within the Microsoft organisation, access to Windows source code is said to be highly compartmentalized, making it easy for modifications to be inserted without the knowledge of even the respective product managers.

Researchers are divided about whether the NSA key could be intended to let US government users of Windows run classified cryptosystems on their machines or whether it is intended to open up anyone's and everyone's Windows computer to intelligence gathering techniques deployed by NSA's burgeoning corps of "information warriors".

According to Fernandez of Cryptonym, the result of having the secret key inside your Windows operating system "is that it is tremendously easier for the NSA to load unauthorized security services on all copies of Microsoft Windows, and once these security services are loaded, they can effectively compromise your entire operating system". The NSA key is contained inside all versions of Windows from Windows 95 OSR2 onwards.

"For non-American IT managers relying on Windows NT to operate highly secure data centres, this find is worrying", he added. "The US government is currently making it as difficult as possible for "strong" crypto to be used outside of the US. That they have also installed a cryptographic back-door in the world's most abundant operating system should send a strong message to foreign IT managers".

"How is an IT manager to feel when they learn that in every copy of Windows sold, Microsoft has a 'back door' for NSA - making it orders of magnitude easier for the US government to access your computer?" he asked.

Can the loophole be turned round against the snoopers?

Dr van Someren feels that the primary purpose of the NSA key inside Windows may be for legitimate US government use. But he says that there cannot be a legitimate explanation for the third key in Windows 2000 CAPI. "It looks more fishy", he said.

Fernandez believes that NSA's built-in loophole can be turned round against the snoopers. The NSA key inside CAPI can be replaced by your own key, and used to sign cryptographic security modules from overseas or unauthorised third parties, unapproved by Microsoft or the NSA. This is exactly what the US government has been trying to prevent. A demonstration "how to do it" program that replaces the NSA key can be found on Cryptonym's website.

According to one leading US cryptographer, the IT world should be thankful that the subversion of Windows by NSA has come to light before the arrival of CPUs that handles encrypted instruction sets. These would make the type of discoveries made this month impossible. "Had the next-generation CPU's with encrypted instruction sets already been deployed, we would have never found out about NSAKEY."

I always knew this would be the case. The German government discovered this sort of thing within the video conferencing software in windows. And have long since commissioned thier own operating system for government use.

Link
http://www.totse.com/en/politics/national_security_agency/hownsaaccesswa168922.html
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised. eg Chinas control of the internet means that they can see and turn off anyone they want.

I used to work in a secure area where I was able to monitor 19,000 PC's and no one knew that I could see exactly what they did. It was like I was standing behind them. I could redirect copies of their print jobs for evidence, and all they would think is that the network was slow.

The world has been using RISC processors for years - it's a hard coded chip, any code could be in those chips and used to validate legitimate use etc...

Conspiracy theories also tend to assist stuff like this. I actually don't have a problem with the protection of the state in the national interest. The guidelines on accessing data are very very tough in countries like australia, abuse it and you go to gaol - as has happened.

If you want to be paranoid, just assume that every modem has a controller chipset that redirects identified traffic to another location.

Just to reinforce the above. Whenever we had correspondence that was sensitive it was typed on a standalone computer with no connection to the outside world, or it was typed on a typewriter (truly!) It was then hand delivered to the receiver by a designated courier. At no stage was it to go through an electronic process where communications were present. This is STILL done.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
gf, I too work for an organisatio that has some databases with very sensitive information. The only way to secure these is as you stated by having them operate as a "stand alone" computer and not connected to the outside world at all. I would think this would be a fairly common practise amongst those who wish to prevent hackers from accessing their information.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I forgot to add that the entire department was "hot sited". eg every keystroke and activity on 19,000+ machines was recorded 24/7/365.25 days of the year. Every print job was compressed as an image and saved.
We monitored over 450+ servers and their networks in real time and we could see every bit of internet traffic that happened.

Every day the system would go through and crunch all the coookies on all those machines and then sort them against a blacklist.

Even if people renamed files (eg downloaded graphics and then saved them as history.txt or evaluation.xls, it was a waste of time, the system would check the header of each new file on the system and validate it. so any graphics/images etc were immediately logged, stored, timestamped on the machine, validated against the logged on user and then deleted.

Some people have no idea how much they are checked. ;) and they have NFI that it happens 99.9% of the time.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
mysterious said:
OUCH!! gf my friend, you are scaring my privacy out of me! Some encouragement needed now to calm myself down. ;)
Let me make you really nervous then. I once attended a demonstration on data recovery at a security conference run by Govt. The platters of a hard drive were formatted and wiped, passed over an electromagnet and then physically cut into 4 prices with an electric saw.

The Defence Intel people then took the pieces away. 3 days later they came back and had recovered approx 97% of the data.

BTW, when people deleted stuff into the recycle bin, on nominated machines it was transferred to an analysis machine for further checking.

Put it this way, if the right people want to see what you are up to, they can, they will and you also won't even suspect that its happened. ;)
 

Awang se

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
Even if you build your own OS, but as long as you get connected, everyone can find a way to access. The key i think is just to make the task easier. They don't need any key at all to get into someone comp. As long as you have enough brain and time and effort, it can be done.
 

Awang se

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
My office have a secure IT system. It was actually a close system with limited outside connection. we use our own com line, not a public com line to connect to other military bases and instalation. There is occasional outside connection with the civilian contractors but even that must be authorized and monitored.
 
Top