Teaching history isn't my job. I try to be as articulate as possible. Perhaps you should try it.Oh!
We had to wait until Iraq to learn that?
I would say that is a lesson well learned and always applied.
Teaching history isn't my job. I try to be as articulate as possible. Perhaps you should try it.Oh!
We had to wait until Iraq to learn that?
I would say that is a lesson well learned and always applied.
Is there any possibility of you being more concise with your posts, or at least using paragraphs so that they are easier to read?Teaching history isn't my job. I try to be as articulate as possible. Perhaps you should try it.
Do you mean to reply to @Ikimieli ? He's the one that's been posting essays on various topics.Is there any possibility of you being more concise with your posts, or at least using paragraphs so that they are easier to read?
I suppose if you think the sheer unlikelyhood of an invasion of Greenland is somehow more dangerous that a nuclear armed Iran, then by all means, send your money to Iran."Why?
If we keep Iran "in the fight", it is going to be harder for Trump to threaten to invade Greenland again.
Correct?
Before the war the oil and gas prices were quite normal AND there was also freedom of navigation...Lindsay Graham says that the victory in Iran is freedom of navigation in Hormuz and stopping Iran from attacking the Arabs in the Gulf. Things that weren’t a thing just two months ago.
In the meantime, gas prices are up 72% here since things weren’t a thing. Seeding season is literally here as well.
It wouldn't be the first time that the objectives of a war become to achieve an outcome that was a status quo before the war started.Before the war the oil and gas prices were quite normal AND there was also freedom of navigation...
Well, it is really worth it, because the american defence industry will get a brighter future because of this.Don’t think it would be status quo though. Iran would, as Merz put it, humiliate the Unites States, for one thing.
And there would have to be some kind of deal made that provides Iran with some assurances of nonaggression in return for the same. And so on. I don’t think status quo is on the horizon. Time will tell though because I do not see how the US, and Trump in particular, can agree to anything along those lines. How can they not, on the other hand, though? It’s a pickle.
Franky, I have no interest in paying higher gas prices (and soon for everything else) because of stupidity of a few. It’s been 1.25 years, but feels like a decade and it is still 2.75 to go, unless the guy drops dead. I know people who think it is all worth it though for the brighter future. Laughing.
Maybe but their defence industry enjoys a large export market that helps pay for America's needs. Trump's actions will eventually (IMHO) erode the export market as many pi$$ed off clients will turn to alternative suppliers. Needless to say the alternatives will take some time though. With the US needing to replenish inventory, deliveries for US kit for export will slow. This will be additional incentive for foreign vendors to ramp up investment and production.Well, it is really worth it, because the american defence industry will get a brighter future because of this.



