J-10

chinawhite

New Member
J-10 for pakistan or F-16

The main advantage i see in the J-10 is the long run. Lower running cost and lower armament cost.

While capability wise the F-16 is the better fighter but it'll be even later on when the J-10 airframe matures. So both of these would be even capability in the future depending on weapons fit or if the F-16 recieves a new engine or new upgrades and what not.

But to weapons. I heard a AIM-120 cost 1million a missile and its just going to get more expensive with new advanced versions like ram jet and new advanced seekers. While there is no denying that a missile will cost a lot but you cant deny chinese missiles will be less expensive and more attractive with the possibility of a production run in pakistan which in theory could give them the ability to control their own cost and give a boost to their economy. Just like the FC-1 i would think that a production line would be built in pakistan if something like 100 planes would be built giving jobs and experience to pakistanis economy


Now what does pakistan need first and foremost?.

While it would need actual planes and any sanctions from america would be crippling for such a large force and a force which were meant to be the tip of your spear having to be ground because of sanctions for whatever you did. I never heard of china putting sanctions on any of its buyers so i would have to say it would have to be china which can deiliver

While i would have to say a air superioty fighter which the J-10 at the momment is configured most for while the F-16 offers better A2G capability it wouldn't really matter if you had better bombing capability you still need to win air superioty and i think the J-10 would win in this scenario because of its better design(VWR) and i would have to say thrust to weight ratio after the AL-31FM-1 engines are installed. And the J-10 does have limited capability like LGB and un-confirmed TVGB capabilities. But does the F-16 offer guided misssile capability? Anti-ship missiles?. Its true that the J-10 thus far does not offer this but when it does it will be more useful considering china has a lead in Anti-ship missiles over america

Im just wondering what the J-10 will feature considering its bigger and the PLAAFs pride and joy. Maybe five MFDs?. Because if it doesn't pack heat then buy some of these FC-1s because their looking good

J-10s also might have it spilt between two cockpits where the first one might only have a confriguration like this but the back seat might be dedicated towards ground strike and guidence. JL-10A radar would be a nice addition. In the future the J-10 might be spilt into two version like the F-16A/B. The F-16 in the US airforce fills the role of ground attack while the F-15 is air superioty. While in the pakistani airforce its a air superioty fighter. The F-16 block 60s hold more fuel than a F-15(internal fuel) and its possible that the J-10 could hold as much fuel as a Su-30 plus adding the three drop tanks. which could make it into a long range patrol. Maybe even twin share where the F-16 which has better A2G could do the ground work while the FC-1 and J-10 does air superioty. FC-1 could be used as a good air interceptor combined with AWACS control


Cockpit wise i would have to say equal to the F-16 block 60 in design with a FC-1 with its very similar layout and full glass cockpit

[img=325x260]http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=114687[/img]


Im just wondering what the J-10 will feature considering its bigger and the PLAAFs pride and joy. Maybe five MFDs?


Any electric gear and radar goes to the F-16 hands down. ECM Data-links the works all belong to the F-16 if we are comparing fighters at this momment. But as the saying goes the turtle won the race or so the story goes

Radar wise the F-16 block 52 is in another generation while the J-10 is being tested with a mecahnically scanned phassed array while a ESA is in development. Passive or active i dont know. But the J-10s mechamical radar offers enough range or BVR with 120km detection or track and has the ability to engage 2-4 fighters. And a more powerful radar is not as useful with these shorter range missiles which does not yet make enough use of the detection range

In my opinion,

Pakistan should go for the F-16 just because they need the capabilities now and cannot wait for the J-10 to mature. While all these J-10 rumours sound to BS to be true.

But if a scenario happens where there is the option to buy the J-10 the stumbling blocks would be

Engine - to a extent. It could be modifled to be fitted with the WS-10A which had just been finished testing and is going into production. While the russians could be nice and jsut let them use the AL-31. But that would invoke the rage of the indians and you know how big a lap dog russia is now days

WS10A Turbofan Engine was formally design certificated and named “ Taihang


US pressure - While the F-16 were a gift to pakistan and the US does not let gifts like this go with out a good reason. And the 40million each fighter that pakistan will be paying for will keep the F-16 production lines open until the F-35 starts production and the on sets of lay offs etc.

It was never on the table to begin with - I like this one the most. Some people going to far.
 
Last edited:

Hussain

New Member
I'd personally go for the J10 as it has a longer range than the F16 and can be modified to meet Pakistan's long term needs. In any case there is absolutely no guarantee that the US will provide Pakistan with state of the art equipment as it provides its allies such as Israel or Greece. In its basic form the F10 will be able to fire BVR missiles which Pakistan needs. As stated already in this thread the F10 and JF17can allow both China and Pakistan to expand their fighter defence industries which unfortunately you cannot do with the induction of US equipment such as the F16.
 

zoolander

New Member
There have been rumors the J-10 will rechieve the WS-10A engine with thrust vectoring controls. Is this true? please post any NEW pictures of the J-10 and also info about future developments. exp. J-10A, J-10C
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
alright, merged the two threads. I believe that China has a TVC developed called the Axen. It was originally shown to be a 2D TVC. Whether or not China has developed a 3D TVC is not known, but it probably has. TVC is now supposedly being integrated onto WS-10A. J-10 doesn't use any WS-10A right now, it uses AL-31FN-M1 which does have 3D TVC.
 

Gaenth

New Member
F-16 ready

OK, the potential of the J-10 seems clear, but probably no one besides the Chinese AF knows it's true capability while the Viper is popular, combat proven, ready to order now and keeps modernizing and adapting. And there are ways to get arround expensive ordnance like the AIM-120: Israel produces advanced BVR missiles that are cheaper (Chile for example chose to equip their Vipers with Israeli missiles), and I think other weapons and systems can be adapted to F-16s cheaper and faster than getting into the development program of the J-10. Now, give the J-10 a TVC engine and you can just expect the Viper to get one on time. And the J-10 may still have to come a long way yet to match the Viper's avionics and durability.
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
Gaenth said:
OK, the potential of the J-10 seems clear, but probably no one besides the Chinese AF knows it's true capability while the Viper is popular, combat proven, ready to order now and keeps modernizing and adapting. And there are ways to get arround expensive ordnance like the AIM-120: Israel produces advanced BVR missiles that are cheaper (Chile for example chose to equip their Vipers with Israeli missiles), and I think other weapons and systems can be adapted to F-16s cheaper and faster than getting into the development program of the J-10. Now, give the J-10 a TVC engine and you can just expect the Viper to get one on time. And the J-10 may still have to come a long way yet to match the Viper's avionics and durability.
You can just expect Viper to get one? F-35 doesn't even use TVC engine. If a future single-engined American fighter is to be equipped with a TVC engine, it would be F-35. J-10 is currently the only fighter to be equipped with 3D tvc and the only single engined fighter to be equipped with tvc. In many ways, you can compare its manuverability to X-31. I think there are a lot of documents on X-31 you can read.

Take a look at the cockpit on FC-1 (there are quite a few recent photos on that), the recent J-10's cockpit is said to be better than that. You can get a sense of how far Chinese avionics have advanced from this.
 

acas7i11o

New Member
Actually Pakistan is getting JF-17s and I think that is the right thing to do. No amount of F-16s or any other aircraft can replace the defensive value that represents having the planes produced in your own country. More than that is the experience that is gained from such project because you can expect a qualitative leap next time they need to build another one.

Cheers,
 

zoolander

New Member
There are some major problems with the J-10. Design wise, the fuel tank is a bit small and engine is underpowered for its size and weight. Like most PLAN planes, it lacks a modern radar and ew package. I am waiting for the J-10a, i am hopin the PLA will not dissapoint me
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
zoolander said:
There are some major problems with the J-10. Design wise, the fuel tank is a bit small and engine is underpowered for its size and weight. Like most PLAN planes, it lacks a modern radar and ew package. I am waiting for the J-10a, i am hopin the PLA will not dissapoint me
i'm not sure about fuel tank, no body even knows how much internal fuel J-10 holds. The speculated numbers at 3000 to 4500 KG, but nothing conclusive. The engine is definitely not underpowered. The thrust of M1 standard is equivalent to the block 50 engines. It does not lack a modern radar, it's radar beat out Russian radar (which is the one equipping mig-29smt) and elta-2032 based on performance. We don't know how good its ew package is.
 

zoolander

New Member
the orignal Lavi fighter was to have small American turbofans, the new russian engines take up 20 percent more room which means smaller tank.


And compared to Western fighters like the Typhoon, the J-10 avionics, radar and etc. are not up to par but the J-10 is has not matured yet.
 

Gaenth

New Member
If a TVC engine becomes available to F-35, and it will eventually I think, why not adapt it to export Vipers and make them more attractive to nations like Pakistan or Greece if they don't go for F-35s because of their price? Of course, development costs would probably soar making this unfeasible and I'm not even sure an F119 derivate would fit on the Viper's pipe. A matured X-31 engine (available before the J-10's) would be a choice maybe. Besides I see F-16s staying in service worldwide even longer than what F-5s have, and all sorts of improvements to it will keep coming. J-10 has yet to sell one export.
 

BilalK

New Member
Wasn't TVC tested on the F-16?

But for fighters like the Viper, it would be a waste of money to put in TVC; for countries like Pakistan, it means higher maintenance costs - and that too without much advantage. The F-16 is as manuverable as it is, TVC is suited for larger fighters like Su-27.
 

colvin123

New Member
There's news that J-10A has armed Chinese military area. you can find it from Janes Defence Weekly. but ,it's not a news----2002-12-06
 

dabrownguy

New Member
If Pakistan did want a air superiority fighter and longer ranged interceptors they wouldn't go for a single engined fighter. Would you wanna fly a single engined fighter across a Indo-Pak bordar? On top of that J-10 doesn't come with a inflight refeuling probe. If its gonna intercept on longer ranges then like you said then 2-3 hardpoints are holding onto fuel tanks while the remaining are for missiles. Thats not exactly airsuperiority that Pakistan needs. I would agree that the J-10 would be better fitted for interception and patroling the coast. The F-16 is the real air superiority fighter the Pakistan aiming to buy 70 of the latest. If Pakistan wants a fighter its the F-16. They've demanded it from the US. Its only logical. If they want air superiority Typhoon and Rafale is the best choice. 30 of them could hold their own. Giving excorts to strike aircraft etc...
 

zoolander

New Member
the current version of the j-10 is better block 40 F-16s. The future generation will be have updated avionics, the WS-10A engine, maybe a mid air refuel rod and TVC. The avionics and the WS-10A engine is a definite. The WS-10A is in production. It has more thrust and is lighter than a AL-31.
The key advantage with the J-10s is price. You cant beat china in price. lol.

India is not that wide , pakistan would be able to cover most of it. Besides majority of the cities are on the west coast. Even with a air fuel rod, the paks dont have air tankers

pakistan should bet on future mature j-10. the thing most facinating about the j-10 is it has the potential to become the next mig-21 or F-16. with the Ws-10a engine it would loss it dependence on russian parts hence allow to export. When this plane mature its going to be quite a plane. The next J-10 due out in a year or two will have the WS-10A engine, a new radar, updated software.

For the J-10 i would like to see a TVC, air refuel, better weapon integration.
I would like to see it able to use the chinese missiles, anti ship missile, guided lasar bombs and better air to air missile such as the pychone 4.
 

dabrownguy

New Member
They can get a tanker anytime. But they don't need to fly over all of India. They need to cover the border and intercept enemy bombers,fighters while at the same time supporting their own strikes from the air.
 

hovercraft

New Member
j-10 is best for pakistan. And i think aquiring f-16 is not possible now because it will takes more then 3 years and usa is going to increase his relations with india and his need of pakistan is not looking more long. usa wants to make india as asian super power against china and also against pakistan(originaly), (which is discussing on many tv channels). so if pakistan again returns to f-16 then may be this deal would not be complete, like ever before.
 

colvin123

New Member
I agree, but I'm afraid that pakistan does like F-16 too! When they developed FC-1, they hope it could be piloted like F-16. as you said ,the relationship between pakistan and U.S.A is not as stable as China, who can tell there won't be a day the u.s.a put another sanction to pakistan.
 

lakhani

New Member
colvin123 said:
I agree, but I'm afraid that pakistan does like F-16 too! When they developed FC-1, they hope it could be piloted like F-16. as you said ,the relationship between pakistan and U.S.A is not as stable as China, who can tell there won't be a day the u.s.a put another sanction to pakistan.
colvin, you are right if you are just loooking at the past of USA and Pak relations. BUt this time the case is little different...
If you have seen the last press conference of musharraf. He clearly stated stated that US will again cheat us if they ever had an option. But thye dont have any.
He stated that US is interested in energy resources of central asia, and if they want to supply these resouces to the world they have to come to Pakistan, as it has the ideal location for this purpose.
so, we can trust on them for deal of F-16, the problem which i am seeing in this deal(this is just impression which I got from statements of musharraf an other high ranked officials) is that pakistan is asking for ToT for some of the technologies of F-16, which U.S is resisting in, and this is the whole reason why Pakistan, got interseted in j-10s.
As now a days Pakistan is interested in building it s own industry and trying to get some experience with least investment.....lolz:D
 
Top