F-35 JSF InsideDefense Newstand: USAF to halt plans of 110 F-35s per year.

Status
Not open for further replies.

F-15 Eagle

New Member
The Air Force has indefinitely suspended plans to ramp up production of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to as many as 110 jets per year, according to senior Air Force officials and Pentagon documents.

For now, the service plans to top-out its purchases at 80 aircraft per year, starting in fiscal year 2016, the same year the fifth-generation fighter is expected to reach its initial operational capability for the Air Force.

“As we look back at what we’ve done to restructure the program, we need to let these changes take effect, see where the program goes and then get on with [a potential increase],” Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Howie Chandler told Inside the Air Force following an April 14 Senate Armed Services readiness subcommittee hearing.

“But right now we need to let these changes settle in and see where the program goes,” he said. “It’s an important program to us and we want to see it succeed, obviously.”

The service is “committed to the JSF and the recent restructuring,” according to Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz, and intends to upgrade its legacy fighters to a fifth-generation fleet, “smartly.”

“As the program continues to progress, we will analyze production capacity and available funding for potential production rate adjustments beyond the 80 aircraft per year rate reflected in the current program,” Schwartz told ITAF in an April 15 e-mail through a service spokeswoman.

During his confirmation hearing in July 2008, Schwartz said he was looking to ramp up Air Force F-35 production to as many as 110 aircraft per year. Then-JSF program manager Maj. Gen. Charles Davis told ITAF the following month that the increase was possible.

Since then, the Pentagon has restructured the entire F-35 program in an attempt to rein in soaring production costs and address testing issues. Across the board, the program restructure cuts 122 aircraft from planned Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps buys between FY-11 and FY-15. The program also revised the low-rate initial production blueprint. The update calls for a total of 420 LRIP aircraft across nine lots. In 2001, the approved LRIP program consisted of 465 jets spread out across six lots.

In all, the Air Force buy of 1,763 conventional take off and landing variants of the JSF is expected to total $186 billion, according to the most recent program estimates in the Pentagon’s Selected Acquisition Reports, which were sent to Capitol Hill earlier this month. The estimate uses then-year dollars.

The Air Force plans to buy 23 F-35s in FY-11, 24 in FY-12, 33 in FY-13, 53 in FY-14 and 70 in FY-15, according to the SAR. Production of 80 jets per year begins in FY-16 and goes through FY-34. To account for the reduction of aircraft purchases in the near term, the Air Force has extended the completion of production one year and has a 15-jet purchase planned for FY-35.

F-35-maker Lockheed Martin said this week that once its Fort Worth, TX, assembly line reaches its optimal production rate in 2016, it could build as many as 230 jets per year, according to company spokesman John Kent. That number includes Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy and international partner jets.

“We will have capacity to build more jets if requested,” he said.

At the same time the Pentagon plans to delay a multiyear procurement deal with Lockheed by two years until FY-16, according to the SAR document. ITAF first reported in August 2009 that the Defense Department was looking to lock down a multiyear procurement deal in the FY-14 time frame. -- Marcus Weisgerber
 

Sea Toby

New Member
After the Democrats gained power in the last election, I never thought the previous production program would survive. I was never under the impression an ongoing program would survive untouched with Republicans in power either. Did you?

Not once in the history of defense procurement has an ongoing program not have changes from year to year. Program projections are just that, projections...

I have seen both aircraft and ship building programs expanded and extended as well as being cut and killed.

So what is new in this news? Nothing really....
 
so this means the USAF will not be purchasing that many F-35s per year, or that total production is being cut back for all customers?

if the USAF is purchasing fewer per year off the start of production, wouldn't that make room for other customers to move up their order dates? or if that is total production per year, why is the USAF the authoritative figure on that number, instead of simple demand?
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
so this means the USAF will not be purchasing that many F-35s per year, or that total production is being cut back for all customers?

if the USAF is purchasing fewer per year off the start of production, wouldn't that make room for other customers to move up their order dates? or if that is total production per year, why is the USAF the authoritative figure on that number, instead of simple demand?
This ony refers to the USAF's planned acquisition rate. I see no mention of any other customers, ie: USN, USMC, RAAF, RAF, Italian Air Force/Navy, Denmark, Holland etc....
 

Sea Toby

New Member
Sometimes the US Congress and defence department cuts orders per whatever is being built for a budget, and sometimes they may cut the orders for one item and increase the orders for another year to year...

An example of an increase would be the C-17 which started off as a program to build 120 aircraft. That number has been increased to over 200 aircraft. Yet, all we hear in the media today is whether there will be more orders for C-17... I don't think anyone has a perfect picture in their crystal ball what the future will be...

While nations such as Australia are hoping to buy 100, they could end up buying only 50 or 75. An Australian order is considerably less than a USAF order of over 1700 aircraft... From an Australian perspective these orders are vital. From a USAF perspective, while the totals are important, they are not vital. The USAF could at any time refurbish older aircraft, or even start a new program which would involve even more delays and development time... At best the crystal ball is cloudy...

Even in a much smaller nation of France the good story about buying and building a third Mistral LHD several years earlier than planned is more or less covered up by not buying or building a second carrier...

The news media are great at writing stories about cuts, i.e., the end is here, whereas they are not so great of reporting stories about increases... With the news media the glass is always half empty, never half full...

I am sure this summer when the Congress and administration decide on which LCS wins the contract, we will find the media disturbed by the loser's failure to win the contract much more than the winner's success at winning the contract....
 

Haavarla

Active Member
The news media are great at writing stories about cuts, i.e., the end is here, whereas they are not so great of reporting stories about increases... With the news media the glass is always half empty, never half full...

I am sure this summer when the Congress and administration decide on which LCS wins the contract, we will find the media disturbed by the loser's failure to win the contract much more than the winner's success at winning the contract....

Aint that the sorry truth:)

Its always taken out of context or not seeing the big picture with the media, and often they miss completly with unacurrate covarage aswell..



Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top