Future MiGs
- Thread starter XEROX
- Start date
Roger Smith
New Member
MiG-I-2000 is a Tactical Stealth Fighter.
It's a conceptual that is as dead as guinea pig stuck in a food blender.PJ-10 BrahMos said:The MiG-I-2000 looks really smart, has anyone got more info on this aircraft, apart from it having stealth
Or is it at just conceptual design stage
Another wonderful design (??) that died due to a lack of reality and roubles.
Thank goodness someone else in here has a sense of humour... :helpAwang se said:
Mig 1.44 is a experimental platform, and should not be classified as future Migs. The company itself is growing desperate every single day, almost solely relying on the fund they make repairing used Migs to keep themselves going. There's two possible ending for Mikoyan, one go bankrupt and wait for Sukhoi to pick up its remains, or (unlikely) manages to find a big foreign buyer for its concepts such as the Mig 1.44. Either way the glorious days of Migs are gone.
dabrownguy
New Member
MiG I.2000 was something with Iran and MiG pulled out of the project latter. It was suppose to be a medium stealth light fighter/trainer.
The MiG-35 has very interesting designs. In my opinon if Mapo had enough funds it would have surpassed the Eurofighter.
The MiG-35 has very interesting designs. In my opinon if Mapo had enough funds it would have surpassed the Eurofighter.
Boy, you leave yourself open to responses when you say things like that.dabrownguy said:
In the absence of any real empirical data on the MFI, why would you even risk saying that? :eek
Sorry, I didn't understand your response. Are you disagreeing with the MFI comment?sikder said:
If you do, can you point out why both Mikoyan, the MFI lead designer and the lead test pilot reinforced that the plane has no future? Mikoyan is sparse on funds and has been directed to provide Irkut with maximum commercial support by the Rus Govt. It can't be much clearer than that, and has been a persistent and consistent message by all the principal parties.
It wasn't meant to be funny, it was an analogy to reinforce what the above 3 entities have said.
It's a dead project. Regardless of what it looks like. By the way, welcome to defencetalk. Please do make an introductions thread in the Intros and Off-Topic forum. Read the rules and enjoy your stay.
actually i believe it was the MiG bureau's design for the PAK-FA project and was supposed to be heavy fighter in the same weight class as the su-30.It's a conceptual that is as dead as guinea pig stuck in a food blender.
Another wonderful design (??) that died due to a lack of reality and roubles.
However both India and Russia chose the Sukhoi concept (t-50) which is a medium weight fighter.
that is why this beautiful mig design is dead.
King_Typhoon
New Member
MIG-1-2000 look like mix f-22 and typhoon, f-18 E/F and other plane.
is it copy and blend into 1 plane?
but cool look plane thought
is it copy and blend into 1 plane?
but cool look plane thought