Welcome to DefenceTalk.com Forum!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

cyber warfare and attacks

Discussion in 'Cybersecurity' started by gf0012-aust, Apr 1, 2017.

Share This Page

  1. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    A detailed story by Bloomberg and vigorous denials by Amazon and Apple. Given the financial implications for Apple and Amazon, how could their response be anything other than vigorous denial? That being said, GCHQ's response seems to support their denials. Certainly given the seriousness of this story, an investigation needs to be done to resolve this matter asap.
     
  2. weaponwh

    weaponwh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    ohio
    the reason we didn't heard more from CNN or other news, probably because US government already deny it, and most expert have doubt over it. I think at some point bloomberg misunderstood something. If china has the ability to manufacture microchip size of pinhead, and has the ability to do what bloomberg claim, then they have no issue to compete with major chip maker such as Intel/AMD/Xilinx, the fact their chip is still generations behind modern chip shows they dont have that capability yet.

    Making SPI/IC interface that small, sure, it can be done, but know what part of BIO/RAM bit file to modify and replace thats beyond current hardware capability. Remember those BITS are generated from compiler operated in an OS environment, to reverse that process and know what those bits means, you need run something similar, not possible via Only Hardware that small.


    U.S. government sides with Apple and Amazon, effectively denying Bloomberg ‘spy chip’ report

     
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2018
  3. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    Again, this is a serious issue. It needs investigation. If the Bloomberg story is totally wrong, how did this happen? Were they setup or incompetent?
     
  4. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
  5. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
  6. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
  7. weaponwh

    weaponwh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    ohio
    look like Bloomberg story is false, perhaps from misunderstand at some point

    Apple's Tim Cook calls for retraction on Chinese spy chip story: 'There's no truth to this'

     
  8. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    464
    Location:
    In the rum store
    May not be so clear cut. It's a classic he said she said. Would it not be Apple protecting itself? I am not saying that they are not telling the truth but they do have strong motivation for the outright denying of the Bloomberg story, because if they admitted that it was correct, then the possibility exists that their customers would abandon them because of perceived product security flaws. Stories like that have caused company collapses before regardless of whether the story was factually correct or not, so I do not blame Apple for outright denying the story.

    Bloomberg would not have printed that story without reasonable evidence due to US criminal libel law and the US tendency to sue at the drop of a hat - lawyers at 10 paces, so somewhere in between the two stories there will be the actual facts of the matter.
     
  9. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto
    I agree wrt the legal issues and it may also be in GCHQ as well as the NSA's interest to downplay this to the point we may never know the truth. Both organizations will be checking everything, I have no doubt about that.
     
  10. weaponwh

    weaponwh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    ohio
    maybe, but as an engineer my self, its almost impossible to pull of hardware hack that do what they said. furthermore security expert from UK and US deny it too.

    I doubt apple/amazon would lie in this case, especially it jeopardize national security if they do so. also if its true, then the culprit is china, not apple/amazon, by lying it, it will just make situation much worse.


    here is another article from supermicro

    Chip company says it would be 'practically impossible' for hackers to breach Apple and Amazon

     
  11. weaponwh

    weaponwh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    ohio
    Bloomberg stands by China microchip article as denials and skepticism mount

     
  12. ngatimozart

    ngatimozart Super Moderator Staff Member Verified Defense Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,293
    Likes Received:
    464
    Location:
    In the rum store
  13. John Fedup

    John Fedup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    Vancouver and Toronto