Menu
Home
Defence News
Military Photos
New media
New comments
Defence Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Latest activity
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
S
Stampede
reacted to
Reptilia's post
in the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
with
Like
.
some good additions to the opvs, some not so good. good -57mm, a no brainer -test bed for other systems is a good idea. bad -nsm...
Nov 5, 2025
Flexson
reacted to
spoz's post
in the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
with
Like
.
We exchanged 37 for 42. RN wanted 37 to fit in the T45 sequence, we wanted to use 39 & 41 and then needed a number for Sydney...
Nov 5, 2025
V
Volkodav
reacted to
spoz's post
in the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
with
Like
.
We exchanged 37 for 42. RN wanted 37 to fit in the T45 sequence, we wanted to use 39 & 41 and then needed a number for Sydney...
Nov 5, 2025
spoz
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
We exchanged 37 for 42. RN wanted 37 to fit in the T45 sequence, we wanted to use 39 & 41 and then needed a number for Sydney...
Nov 5, 2025
V
Volkodav
reacted to
Sandson41's post
in the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
with
Like
.
I hadn't noticed the messing around with Canberra and Adelaide. Thanks for pointing that out. Apparently, the issue of number 40 has...
Nov 5, 2025
S
Stampede
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
Don’t disagree re fitting big things in a given space. It’s certainly big and it does beg the question re shallow and confined waterways...
Nov 5, 2025
S
Stampede
reacted to
Going Boeing's post
in the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
with
Like
.
I believe that the hull diameter is dictated by the PWR-3 reactor and associated systems. Also, as a lot of systems and new technology...
Nov 5, 2025
Todjaeger
replied to the thread
NZDF General discussion thread
.
The above is why I suspect topweight was such an issue for the RNZN's frigate configuration. The RAN first starting ANZAC-class...
Nov 5, 2025
Flexson
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
And why they didn't use 311. With the NAB vessels Fourcroy and Inscription being 310 and 320. Lot's of weird things with vessel numbers...
Nov 4, 2025
Flexson
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
That's exactly what I said. Have a closer look at the numbers I wrote.
Nov 4, 2025
Ananda
replied to the thread
General Aviation Thread
.
https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americas-news-now/plane-crashes-at-louisville-airport-injuries-reported-muhammed-ali-international-ups-w...
Nov 4, 2025
M
MARKMILES77
replied to the thread
Australian Army Discussions and Updates
.
Army has been using the new Australian made F60 "Bangalore Torpedos" for the first time...
Nov 4, 2025
Lofty_DBF
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
Hopefully the SSN Aukus have a dedicated gym and office work spaces. It's pretty ordinary having to use your mess for work related...
Nov 4, 2025
Sandhi Yudha
replied to the thread
Unmanned Lunar Missions
.
The Luna 26 Moon orbiter is planned for launch on a Soyuz-2.1b in 2027. The Luna 27 mission is now divided/seperated in two space...
Nov 4, 2025
S
Stampede
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
I like the red double decker bus for scale. It’s a very big boat!!! What dictates this very large size? Cheers S
Nov 4, 2025
Home
What's new
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top