The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread

seaspear

Well-Known Member
Largely ammunition otherwise you would have to consider North Korea had its own vast stores of such that were more than the N.A.T.O stocks
this graph shows a large increase in imports from China to North Korea
 

rsemmes

Active Member
Now we have Kamianske (but I guess all that area has plenty of minefields) and Milove. A long way to Prikolotne-Velikii Burluk, but Ukraine will have to send more troops there.
Could Russia be thinking about opening more fronts instead of one offensive?
 
Largely ammunition otherwise you would have to consider North Korea had its own vast stores of such that were more than the N.A.T.O stocks
this graph shows a large increase in imports from China to North Korea
I'm not sure if 40% is a correct percentage. Either way, it's wise for Russia to utilize North Korean factories, much in the same way Ukraine utilizes Western factories; the difference being is the cost to produce is substantially cheaper for the Russians. I can't imagine North Korean labor being expensive or having to contend with complaints of poor working conditions. What I'm curious about is knowing if they've helped the Koreans open up new production lines and helped them get new machine tooling, ect. Plus, I'm curious if they've started drone manufacturing lines besides munitions. Either way, it's a win/win for both. You must account for how expensive and all the bureaucracy that goes on with Western production and sourcing.
 

seaspear

Well-Known Member

Redshift

Active Member
I'm not sure if 40% is a correct percentage. Either way, it's wise for Russia to utilize North Korean factories, much in the same way Ukraine utilizes Western factories; the difference being is the cost to produce is substantially cheaper for the Russians. I can't imagine North Korean labor being expensive or having to contend with complaints of poor working conditions. What I'm curious about is knowing if they've helped the Koreans open up new production lines and helped them get new machine tooling, ect. Plus, I'm curious if they've started drone manufacturing lines besides munitions. Either way, it's a win/win for both. You must account for how expensive and all the bureaucracy that goes on with Western production and sourcing.
'Not worrying about "Complaints about poor conditions"' now that is a a serious understatement!!!

It's probably not a huge win for the North Korean people, just the regime, after all near slave labour production lines can be very cheap indeed.
 

rsemmes

Active Member
"South Korea’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reports that since October 2024, North Korea has shipped about 28,000 containers filled with conventional weapons and ammunition to Russia. Based on standard load calculations, these shipments amount to more than 12 million rounds of 152 mm artillery shells, a key caliber for Russian howitzers and gun-howitzers."

So, Ukraine knows that Russia has loaded 42,000 containers with ammo and weapons since October 2024.

I wonder if we should take figures provided by Ukraine with more than a pinch of salt.
 

vikingatespam

Well-Known Member
Whatever scenario, you just call it irrational or fantasy. There is no point. (Invading Grenada was an irrational paranoid fantasy?)
Give me a scenario that isnt irrational fantasy then. Address the 5 points I brought up. No one has been able to do that yet.

Genada ? Why would that be a fantasy ?
 

rsemmes

Active Member
No, the issue is whether or not NATO nations could mount a credible invasion of Russia.
Credible for the invaders or for the invaded?

You cannot limit the "issue" to your convenience. Was the invasion of Ukraine credible? No, not in a Afghanistan/Iraq style, invading and occupying the whole country. The mobilization of all of the Russian Armed Forces for the conquer of Ukraine? Not credible.
It has already pointed out. A SMO, is that credible? It has to be credible only to the (to be) invaded.

Grenada is just an example. A threat to the existence of USA? To its independence? A credible threat? A future threat? Anyway, should US consider that or Kenya?
 

Redshift

Active Member
Credible for the invaders or for the invaded?

You cannot limit the "issue" to your convenience. Was the invasion of Ukraine credible? No, not in a Afghanistan/Iraq style, invading and occupying the whole country. The mobilization of all of the Russian Armed Forces for the conquer of Ukraine? Not credible.
It has already pointed out. A SMO, is that credible? It has to be credible only to the (to be) invaded.

Grenada is just an example. A threat to the existence of USA? To its independence? A credible threat? A future threat? Anyway, should US consider that or Kenya?
Whataboutism, because USA invasion of Grenada was unjustified has no bearing on Russia's invasion of Ukraine
 

crest

Member
I noticed the new trump weapons to NATO for Ukraine deal doesn't have any limitations on weapon type. I believe it was also stated it won't need to go thru the house or the Senate. As it's a pay later type thing or seams to be detailes are vague (intentionally I suppose)

To the greater point of impact it's hard to see this turning into a weapons rush GREATER then that seen in the past so it's hard to see how the impact would contain let alone reverse Russian momentum. Even moreso when you factor in the greater manpower disparity that is now in effect. I would also note what at least to me seems to be a much greater focuse if not ability of Russia to hit supply lines and depots in the far west of ukraine, I suspect it will be a difficult problem to re-establish a layered air defence in volume well we continue to see the daily drone and missile attack by Russia in the numbers we have been seeing recently.
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Largely ammunition otherwise you would have to consider North Korea had its own vast stores of such that were more than the N.A.T.O stocks
this graph shows a large increase in imports from China to North Korea
Has there been any suggestion that P.L.A.N munitions have been siphoned through North Korea into Russia?
Sorry, maybe I misunderstand, but I'm curious. Why do you think PLA Navy munitions specifically? Was there some items that showed up in Ukraine that I missed?
 
Top