Reuters: India tests supersonic Brahmos cruise missile

srirangan

Banned Member


Sun June 13, 2004 7:11 PM GMT+05:30

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India successfully test-fired a Brahmos supersonic cruise missile on Sunday, marking the end of the experimental phase of the missile being jointly developed with Russia, a defence spokesman said.

The missile was fired from the Chandipur test range on the east coast.

"The test of the army version of the missile was successful. Earlier tests were experimental. This is the first of the production series to be tested," the spokesman said.

The sea- and air-launched missile, named after India's Brahmaputra river and Russia's Moscow river, has a range of 290 km and can carry a conventional warhead of up to 300 kg.

India's rival, Pakistan, has conducted two tests of nuclear-capable missiles since late last month.

The nuclear-armed neighbours are scheduled to hold talks this month, the latest negotiations in a peace process that began last year.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Oqaab said:
If I m not wrong, the speed of brahmos is mach 2.7 right ?
It should be more or less the same as the Yakhont. India has changed the guidance system, all things being equal, unless the new guidance system is substantially heavier than the russian original, it's absolute speed and range will be affected by the weight variation.

India had plans to extend the range, so they either start to extend the efficiency of the propellant, change the dimensions of the propellant bay, extend the length (which will then effect platform mounting) or lighten it.
A higher absolute speed will shorten the range in it's current dimensions.

IIRC the Yakhont was m2.6, but I have seen figures as high as 3.2
Again, IIRC, the USN missiles used to simulate Yakhont/Brahmos are mach 2.6 and some have been modified to travel at mach 3.3

One of our Indian friends might have diff figures avail.
 

adsH

New Member
brilliant but it is being developed in partnership with israel. I see where israel got its Tech Help from, for its new Cruise missile, Obviously the INdians are more Advance on Missiles. And of-course no one can dictate restrictions on INdia so India has a freehand to develop what eve they Want, well good job !!
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
adsH said:
Obviously the INdians are more Advance on Missiles.
I'm not sure I'd say that. India is after all, contracting Israeli firms to use the Popeye as a sub launched ASM rather than Brahmos. There's the little matter of the Dolphins that have been running around the Indian Ocean as proof of concept platforms. The Israelis have enormous experience in missile technology over India. Pythons, Gabriels, Lahat, Arrow etc ..... Often the Israeli systems are on par if not superior to the best of what the US/Euro's have designed. They've also modified Russian ALI's in partnership with traditional Russian design shops.

Where India does appear to have the current edge is in rocket systems. (where Israel has no operational requirement for such platforms)
 

adsH

New Member
gf0012 said:
adsH said:
Obviously the INdians are more Advance on Missiles.
I'm not sure I'd say that. India is after all, contracting Israeli firms to use the Popeye as a sub launched ASM rather than Brahmos. There's the little matter of the Dolphins that have been running around the Indian Ocean as proof of concept platforms. The Israelis have enormous experience in missile technology over India. Pythons, Gabriels, Lahat, Arrow etc ..... Often the Israeli systems are on par if not superior to the best of what the US/Euro's have designed. They've also modified Russian ALI's in partnership with traditional Russian design shops.

Where India does appear to have the current edge is in rocket systems. (where Israel has no operational requirement for such platforms)
GF this is a joke please excuse me for this in advance i appologise for for haunting the fourm with my terrible sense of humor (and spelling at times, GOD only knows what whould i have done without this Spellcheck module i wrote for my web browser).

If the israelis are giving India its dolphins, i think PAK navy should call its Subs Sharks AKA Dolphin Killers :lol i know its a bad joke!! but hey my sense of humor in real life is non existent. ie (Non internet based reality is non exsistant) i try, ! i do try.


GF would you say the Dolphins are one of the more capable Subs compared to the Augusta 90 B being built at Pak Docks.

GF i think Israel is on a road to self improvements i think they feel threatened by the growing sophistication and numbers of quality vessels in the Red sea RSN has procured four french stealth Frigates and has other very capable platforms. i think they are interested in the Alkhalid Class Subs built in Pakistan.



Back to the topic does any one know what kind of Warhead the brahmos can carry ie the payload .
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
adsH said:
GF would you say the Dolphins are one of the more capable Subs compared to the Augusta 90 B being built at Pak Docks.

GF i think Israel is on a road to self improvements i think they feel threatened by the growing sophistication and numbers of quality vessels in the Red sea RSN has procured four french stealth Frigates and has other very capable platforms. i think they are interested in the Alkhalid Class Subs built in Pakistan.
The capability of the platform is important, but the capability of the crew is more important. eg, It's been said a few times that in Kuwait or Iraq, that the US or UK tankers could have swapped places and driven T-72'sm the Iraquis could have had M1's and Chally's and that the US/UK tankers would still have won.

Thats because they train harder, train realistically and have the advantage of places like Salisbury Hill and Aberdeen to refine their tactics.

To be honest, I do not see the RSN as a capable skimmer navy. The French have been enormously frustrated at trying to train Saudi Sailors and Airmen due to a number of differences. The Israelis are more focussed at war fighting, better integrated, better motivated and culturally attuned to delivering what they see as essential behaviours to "win".

Any Navy in that region would need to accord the Israeli Dolphins a high degree of respect, and if they do manage to get new 212's or 214's off Germany, that will elevate them a number of levels again over their potential enemies.

You need to remember that Israel has absolutely dominated their enemies at ratio's of 10:1 against them, that is 3 times higher than the normal ratio of an attacking force to a defender. 3:1 is seen as the winnable ration. They have held out at 10:1. It is only recently (last 20 years) where there has been a substantial shift in equipment levels and quality. Prior to Lebanon, all of the OPFORs had notional superiority in both equipment numbers and in some areas "of type". Israel has dominated on uneven terms due to national focus and a warfighting psyche.

The excuse that is typically used is that US money and equipment is the reason why they win. That fails to stand up to even cursory investigation (even the Russian assessments acknowledged that Israeli dominance had very very little to do with US equipment but more to do with focus)

In short, the RSN is no match for Israeli subs, even though they are export Lafayettes. (India has also had some involvement with training Saudi naval officers, and their experiences have been just as frustrating as those experienced by the French)
 

adsH

New Member
Pakistan Naval colleges have Saudi Candidate intakes and i think the two navies have a strong Relation. if we talk about training, we have to talk about the motivation factor of the naval forces ie is the person doing what he would be good at. the officer has to be the right person for the job unsuitable candidate are usually encountered during training programs due to intake process corruption, as i had mentioned some time back the Saudi armed forces woud require a foreign force to fight there wars simply because of corruption that causes the inefficiency.you have to have an attitude to follow a path!!,for instance in Pakistan becoming a soldier or a naval officer is almost hereditary,as soon as a child is born in a family who happens to be in service, these kids have a profound interest and a certain level of influence over them selves.ie they have a determination.this trate has gone onn in the military Families of the subcontinent for a thousand year.
 

srirangan

Banned Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #11
brilliant but it is being developed in partnership with israel. I see where israel got its Tech Help from, for its new Cruise missile, Obviously the INdians are more Advance on Missiles. And of-course no one can dictate restrictions on INdia so India has a freehand to develop what eve they Want, well good job !!
dude it's being developed with Moscow not Tel Aviv/ :roll
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
dude it's being developed with Moscow not Tel Aviv/

srirangan, which missile are you taking about? the current anti-shipping missile that is being evaluated is Popeye. It's nuclear tipped (which brahmos cannot fit) and it's a longer range. The range has been suggested at circa 1000k and has been as high as 1500k.

Brahmos is co-russian support, but it's a diff missile with diff requirements. The N tip Popeye for submarines is Israeli dominated with some Indian involvement. The reason why Popeye is being looked at is warhead potential and range. Plus it does not suffer from the terminal guidance issues that plagued Brahmos early development.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
srirangan said:
This is is about the Brahmos and we are discussing that aren't we?
dunno mate, I'm confused myself now. too many topics to answer - I'm starting to lose it. :D:
 

Pathfinder-X

Tribal Warlord
Verified Defense Pro
oh a range of 290, guess Globalsecurity.org overestimated the range of the missile. I knew something was not right on their article, they mentioned 340km.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Pathfinder-X said:
oh a range of 290, guess Globalsecurity.org overestimated the range of the missile. I knew something was not right on their article, they mentioned 340km.
Personally I don't try to quote GlobalSecurity that much, they get a bit of data wrong sometimes. (ditto for FAS, but they share scrapes, so it's understandable that they make the same mistakes)

Russia was not allowed under the International Missile provisons to sell a cruise missile that went beyond 300k's. So any extension of range would have to be made by the Indian DRDO I would assume. As it is, extending the range would substantially alter the dimensions of the missile.

It's not an easy or trivial task.
 

lalith prasad

Banned Member
there have been reports quoting some analyst that india is considering working two versions of brahmos with 500 and 900 kms range respectively by the way the speed of brahmos is m2.8 they have published an article of brahmos with a picture of it being fired in the frontline .during its second test it scored a direct hit on drifting decimmissioned indian navy warship.the seventh flight was conducted under cyclonic conditions.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
lalith prasad said:
there have been reports quoting some analyst that india is considering working two versions of brahmos with 500 and 900 kms range respectively by the way the speed of brahmos is m2.8 they have published an article of brahmos with a picture of it being fired in the frontline .during its second test it scored a direct hit on drifting decimmissioned indian navy warship.the seventh flight was conducted under cyclonic conditions.
any links for this lalith? I'd be interested to know what the test conditions were etc....
 

srirangan

Banned Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #19
I've read that the actual range of the Brahmos is near the 400km mark, but what's been revealed is under 300km because to international regulations.
 
Top