Researching the weapons of the future: genetically modified bioweapons

yasin_khan

New Member
Advances in nanotechnology, genetics and nuclear isomers are permitting the production of a new generation of unconventional weapons.

As one of the most rapidly moving areas of scientific research today, biotechnology presents the most immediate emerging threat for weapons development. The revolution in genetic modification (GM) techniques could create even deadlier strains of disease and provide cheaper methods of development, as well as blurring the dividing line between curing disease and causing it. Terrorists and nation-states with adequate biological expertise could capitalise on the GM revolution using minimal resources and equipment. Unscrupulous scientists lending or selling their services to terrorist groups could also exploit many advances taking place at medical and biological institutes as civilian research and development.

An obvious conclusion is that smallpox, anthrax and other diseases are deadly enough without being modified. While smallpox itself is believed to kill 30 per cent of the people it infects, it is not likely to affect vaccinated populations; a GM smallpox virus, however, that cannot be countered by vaccination would doubtless be much more lethal.

GM weapons are not new. The Soviet civilian biological warfare agency, Biopreparat, from 1973 experimented with various harmful and antidote-resistant organisms, including a combination of smallpox with Venezuelan equine encephalitis, known as ‘Veepox’. Russia also developed ‘Obolensk’ anthrax - a strain resistant to both vaccines and antibiotics.

With the application of GM techniques, up to 100 times more pathogens or toxins could be produced per cell than by naturally occurring strains. It would be possible to insert genes into infectious micro-organisms to increase their antibiotic resistance, virulence and environmental stability. For example, the gene for antibiotic resistance could be removed from the notorious hospital ‘superbug,’ staphylococcus aureus, which is antibiotic-resistant. This could then be transferred into a far more dangerous organism like the plague, thereby making plague, which in its bubonic form is curable, extremely difficult to treat.

One of the problems of creating and delivering a biological weapon is maintaining its survival once it has been dispersed. The agents in many existing bioweapons do not spread easily or at all. Bioagents could be genetically modified to have enhanced hardiness to facilitate delivery and dissemination and to increase infectivity. Making a pathogen survive longer under specified environmental conditions, and be difficult or impossible to detect, may soon be possible.


http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jcbw/jcbw040914_1_n.shtml
 

neel24neo

New Member
bio-weopons are the most affordable form of WMD.and perhaps it is the oldest form of WMD in practice.although the mordern bio-weopons were part of national arsenals for well over the past fifty years,little is known about them.modification of bio-weopon strains too is nothing new.reportedly,weoponised strains produce symptoms very different from the natural strains and are usually selected for resistance to anti-biotics and vaccines.well,that was the practice until genetic-engineering came along.now it is possible to 'create'superstrains and combine the deadly effects of two or more lethal organisms or strains.in this context anthrax(even in weoponised form)is nothing compared to small pox and comes nowhere near ebola.ebola zaire has a kill rate of 90%in its natural form-unmatched by any other organism known to us on this planet earth.reportedly,both USA and USSR had stockpiles of weaponised ebola.whether they are still around or they were destoyed no one knows.but the trouble with ebola is that it kills its victims too fast.the disease doesnt get enough chance to spread around,thats the reason why ebola outbreaks disappear as quickly as they had apeared.but now it is possible to make 'tailored' strains to suit your needs.and you dont need multi million dollar research facilities,all you need is a basic bio-tech lab.in US(before 9/11)you could obtain strains through mail from research establishments.if thats the case in the US imagine bio-weopons 'lying about'in erstwhile USSR?add to that thousands of jobless scientists...its scary.
 
Top