Guys pls dont get into childish fight.Any way i would like to know ,more abt f-16 vs su-30mki scenarios...
Like suryaaa, I do not want to take sides on this discussion. If you want to have a mature discussion, it would be better if the comparisons are supported by external links (to external and reputable defence websites and not forums), demonstrating where you obtained the information.
Please also consider setting up 'fair' comparisons. Further, identify if your comparisons are limited to platforms (or if you are making a systems level comparison). That way, it will be a gentlemanly discussion that is considered informed.
Let me give you 2 examples of what I mean. If you want to talk about the Su-30MKI's capabilities in carrying the R-77, you should also consider if the F-16 can carry the AMRAAM.
eg.1 Don't set up a scenario where the Su-30MKI will carry BVR missiles and the F-16 is limited to WVR missiles. It's not fair and not realistic.
eg.2 If you want to compare F-16 blocks (like F-16A Block 15OCU / F-16B Block 15OCU), please demonstrate an awareness of the possibility of a MLU for the relevant F-16 'block' and an understanding of whether the relevant F-16 'block' is BVR missile capable.
Questions you need to ask include:
(i) What is the helmet system used by the relevant F-16 driver? For example, I know that Singapore's F-16 block 52+ drivers use DASH. Do you know the type of helmet system that the Pakistani F-16 driver uses?
(ii) When does the TVC advantage kick in? (Is it only in WVR range or are there other times it could be useful?)
(iii) What about the issue of energy management?
P.S. Please read the pinned thread on DACT. Thereafter, you will realise why most people do not like to use DACT as evidence of platform superiority.
P.P.S. Please don't use very old comparisons of fighting spirit (technology and the world has changed), unless you want to limit your discussion to that time period.