U.S. Navy to deploy ships near N. Korea

XEROX

New Member
U.S. Navy to deploy ships near N. Korea
By ERIC TALMADGE, ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER


ABOARD THE USS CORONADO -- In the first step toward erecting a multi-billion-dollar shield to protect the United States from foreign missiles, the U.S. Navy will begin deploying state-of-the-art destroyers to patrol the waters off North Korea as early as next week.

The mission, to be conducted in the Sea of Japan by ships assigned to the Navy's 7th fleet, will help lay the foundation for a system to detect and intercept ballistic missiles launched by "rogue nations."

Washington hopes to complete the network over the next several years.

"We are on track," Vice Admiral Jonathan Greenert, commander of the 7th Fleet, told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday aboard the USS Coronado, which is based just south of Tokyo. "We will be ready to conduct the mission when assigned."

The deployment will be the first in a controversial program that is high on President Bush's defense agenda. Bush cleared the way to build the system two years ago by withdrawing from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which banned ship-based missile defenses.

He said protecting America from ballistic missiles was "my highest priority as commander in chief, and the highest priority of my administration."

The project - likened to hitting a bullet with a bullet, only at three times the speed - is exceedingly complex, prompting many critics to argue that it will never be reliable or effective. It is also expensive, with an estimated price tag of US$51 billion over the next five years.

Even so, the missile threat is hard to deny

More than 30 nations have ballistic missiles, according to the U.S. Defense Department's Missile Defense Agency. Though exact times depend on where the launch occurs, missiles could in less than 30 minutes reach virtually anywhere within the United States.

Greenert refused to give a specific date for the first deployment from the 7th Fleet, but said a deadline of Oct. 1 - next Friday - announced by Navy Secretary Gordon England in March has not changed.

Greenert, who assumed command of the Navy's largest fleet last month, also refused to name a target for the Sea of Japan patrols.

"I can't specify adversaries, but you're looking at rogue nations," he said in his first interview since taking the fleet command. "Take it from there."

The country best fitting that description in East Asia is communist wildcard North Korea, which has missiles capable of reaching the American west coast and is believed to either already possess or be well on its way toward successfully developing nuclear weapons.

The North shocked Japan in 1998 by launching a multistage "Taepodong" ballistic missile over Japan's main island. Tokyo responded by beefing up its own surveillance capabilities and launching its first spy satellites in March 2003.

Though Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi won a promise in 2002 from the North for a moratorium on further long-range tests, distrust runs deep.

This week, Japanese naval ships were dispatched to the waters off North Korea amid reports that Pyongyang was preparing to test launch a "Nodong" missile, which can reach much of Japan - and the more than 50,000 U.S. troops stationed there - in just minutes.

North Korea is believed to have at least 100 of the missiles.

Because of the North Korean threat, Japan has become the first country to agree to work with Washington on the missile defense project. It is upgrading its own destroyers and acquiring better U.S.-made interceptors - the ship-launched Standard Missile-3 and the ground-based Patriot Advanced Capability-3.

"The Japanese are very interested in developing a missile defense," Greenert said.

He said the role of the 7th Fleet destroyers will be to provide long-range search and tracking of missile activity. Eventually, data gleaned by the ships would be transmitted to Ft. Greely in Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, where, if necessary, interceptor missiles would be launched.

But for now, tracking and monitoring are as far as the mission can go. The interceptors won't be fully deployed at the American bases until next year.


http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/natio...tegory=1104&slug=Japan US Missile Defense
 

P.A.F

New Member
i hadn't heard of that. but if they did then i don't see why NK should stop makeing nuclesr weapons. after all they do have the right to protect them selves.
 

P.A.F

New Member
http://www.dawn.com/2004/10/02/top17.htm

US deploys destroyers off N. Korea

WASHINGTON, Oct 1: US destroyers equipped with Aegis missile tracking systems have been deployed in the Sea of Japan near North Korea as part of a missile defense system that Washington intends to declare operational this year, the Navy's civilian chief said on Friday.

"We do have our Aegis destroyers deployed and indeed they do have tracking capability as we committed to do before the end of the year," Navy Secretary Gordon England told reporters. -AFP
 

yasin_khan

New Member
U.S. Deploys Destroyers off N. Korea As Part of Missile Defense


U.S. destroyers equipped with Aegis missile tracking systems have been deployed in the Sea of Japan near North Korea as part of a controversial new U.S. missile defense system, the Navy’s civilian chief said Oct. 1.

"We do have our Aegis destroyers deployed and indeed they do have tracking capability as we committed to do before the end of the year," Navy Secretary Gordon England told reporters.

England confirmed reports that the destroyers were in the Sea of Japan near North Korea, whose long-range missile and nuclear weapons programs put it at the top of the U.S. threat list.

But he would not say whether it meant the missile defense system that the United States is erecting at bases in Alaska and California is now operational.

Pentagon officials have said the United States is on track to declare the system’s "initial defensive capability" this year, providing a limited defense against long range missile attack by a "rogue" state.

Critics of the system, however, say there is little confidence the system will work because it has not been sufficiently tested.

The Aegis destroyers’ powerful radars would be used to track long-range missiles after they have been detected by early warning radars. Data from the radars flow to command centers where they are integrated with other targeting data to launch interceptor missiles into the path of the incoming missile.

So far, the Pentagon has deployed five interceptor missiles at Fort Greely, Alaska. One more is to be added at Fort Greely in mid-October and two others at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California before the end of the year.

Early warning radars and Aegis radars on navy destroyers have been upgraded for the missile defense system. The command and control system linking the radars to the interceptor missile also have now been installed, said Rick Lehner, a spokesman for the Missile Defense Agency.

He said the U.S. Northern Command, Strategic Command and the Pacific Command will conduct a series of warfighting exercises before a decision is made to declare the system to be operational.

The system will be tested electronically to ensure its components are performing correctly, but there will be no actual test launch of an interceptor missile from Fort Greely at a target missile before it is declared to have an "initial defensive capability," he said.

The last time the system was flight tested was in December 2002. However, a surrogate booster and radar were used in those and earlier tests.

Thomas Christie, the Pentagon’s chief of operational testing and evaluation of weapon systems, has warned they system may be only 20 percent effective.

Retired general Eugene Habiger, former head of the U.S. Strategic Command, recently decried the rush to field a system, saying it "does not have any credible capability."

"I cannot recall any military system being deployed in such a manner," he said. "In my entire military experience, I have never seen a weapons system deployed with something as squishy, if you will, as an "initial defensive capability."

Habiger also suggested the North Korean threat has been exaggerated, saying it has not flight tested an intercontinental ballistic missile and must first overcome the formidable challenge of miniaturizing a nuclear warhead.

"The defense is going to be a system that has never been flight-tested, against a threat that has never been flight-tested," he said.

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=383802&C=america
 
Top