FC-1 prototype 1

[solid]

http://pic.tiexue.net/origin/2004_5/2004_5_22_79830.jpg
http://pic.tiexue.net/origin/2004_5/2004_5_22_79849.jpg

 

[adsH]

there have been big alterations i can't point them out becasue i am not well versed in AeroNautic stuff i can point to the Top of the AC there is this weard F-16 Section i think might be for Extra fuel or to improve Structural strength :?


But now it's looking like a real weapon i guess there will more Changes to IMprove its ability before its Induction date!! i bet it would turn out to look very different after induction.

 

[Pathfinder-X]

is it the angle or is those two planes has slight difference??
the first one seem to have a enlarged fuel tank at the back, the second doesn't.

 

[solid]

is it the angle or is those two planes has slight difference??
the first one seem to have a enlarged fuel tank at the back, the second doesn't.

They are same, except the wing fences were cancelled on prototype3(the 2nd pic).

 

[adsH]

has some one the noticed the area behind the glass cockpit in the Second one it is rounded and curvy and the first one which i presume is more refined and modified has a Squarish or blockish look to it.i perfer the First!!

 

[solid]

has some one the noticed the area behind the glass cockpit in the Second one it is rounded and curvy and the first one which i presume is more refined and modified has a Squarish or blockish look to it.i perfer the First!!

no, it's caused by angle.
evidence:

 

[XEROX]

looks very similar to the MIG (in design) the russian air force rejected......cannot remember which one though

 

[mysterious]

It has a 'touch' of Mig-33 in its design but is entirely different at the same time. Read the Jf-17's five-part report that DefenseTalk.com has put out to get a better understanding of the aircraft and issues related to it. :smokingc: