Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Military Strategy and Tactics
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

-77689755705287080691.jpg

-7768975570528708069.jpg

Ural_Taifun_V-day_parade_Yekaterinburg.jpg

Kamaz_Taifun_at_trials.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Chess vs. Go

This is a discussion on Chess vs. Go within the Military Strategy and Tactics forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; When it comes to warfare I wanted to know how different the battlefield is viewed from if you played Go ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old September 20th, 2011   #1
Banned Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Elkridge
Posts: 11
Threads:
Chess vs. Go

When it comes to warfare I wanted to know how different the battlefield is viewed from if you played Go (Weiqi in Chinese) compared to if you played Chess? I know that Go is the most complex board game ever built/played and Chess isn't stratergic like Go is but still...

BlCityfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 26th, 2011   #2
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 28
Threads:
Go doesn't reflect a battlefield- not in today's world. It takes months to train Marines, several years to build a ship, far longer to design and implement a new fighter. Desert Storm lasted a matter of weeks, and the world's 4th largest army was annihilated.

Occupations are occupations, but Chess more accurately reflects a future war between two countries, like the USA and China.
EmperorNortonII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 20th, 2011   #3
Banned Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Elkridge
Posts: 11
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmperorNortonII View Post
Go doesn't reflect a battlefield- not in today's world. It takes months to train Marines, several years to build a ship, far longer to design and implement a new fighter. Desert Storm lasted a matter of weeks, and the world's 4th largest army was annihilated.

Occupations are occupations, but Chess more accurately reflects a future war between two countries, like the USA and China.
Not really true at all. Chess only shows different ways to target different enemies at the controller's choosing. While Weiqi really reflects the actual battlefield that goes on in any war. Cause when the enemy is trapped they can't escape, but in Chess the peices can just magically "leap" away out of danger.

Based on your post BOTH games would have the same weakness/liability.
BlCityfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2011   #4
Just Hatched
Private
W82DIE's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 9
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlCityfan View Post
Not really true at all. Chess only shows different ways to target different enemies at the controller's choosing. While Weiqi really reflects the actual battlefield that goes on in any war. Cause when the enemy is trapped they can't escape, but in Chess the peices can just magically "leap" away out of danger.

Based on your post BOTH games would have the same weakness/liability.
Chess could represent a war if the countries had similar power. We also know that whoever makes a big mistake in opening usually loses...
W82DIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2011   #5
Defense Enthusiast
Chief Warrant Officer
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 459
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlCityfan View Post
When it comes to warfare I wanted to know how different the battlefield is viewed from if you played Go (Weiqi in Chinese) compared to if you played Chess? I know that Go is the most complex board game ever built/played and Chess isn't stratergic like Go is but still...

I think that Shogi, sometime referred to as Japanese chess, is of all the board games the most like real warfare because it has several qualities within it that mimic real warfare better than western chess or Go. I am not saying it is a better board game. That is a different question entirely.

The two features I am referring too can be seen when you capture an opponent’s piece and then later in the game, in the place of moving one of your pieces then in play on the board, you can drop it anywhere on the board that has an open space as you own piece. I think that makes it far more like real warfare than ether western chess or Go. But that very feature, with all the random qualities that it imparts, lessens the valve of the player's skill in determining the victor and this makes it, as a board game, far less refined. The reason why it is not as popular.
rip is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 PM.