A few questions, comments and thoughts come immediately to mind. The first involves grammar and 'Litespeak, or the sorts of abbreviations people tend to use on SMS/texting systems. Namely do not do it, as it can rapidly make one's post nonsensical like the above uses of 2, were you meaning two, to, or too? Context can sometimes help but this sort of writing lacks clarity or precision. Plus it tends to make some members of the Mod team grumpy...
The second is in the nature of a question, how much experience do you have firing and reloading a clip or magazine-fed semi- or fully-automatic rifles, SMG's, or pistols? I ask because I know personnel who regularly do training drills where they have to move, shoot, reload, move, shoot, etc. As such they practice loading fresh clips into their weapons while on the move and keeping the barrel pointed at the targets downrange.
The third is a request for a better explanation or description of your proposed solution. So far, the best I can make of what has been proposed is to enlarge the initial aperture where the magazine or clip slides in and then have the aperture narrow/funnel down to the proper width for the magazine or clip in question. Without a better understanding of what the intended solution is though, one had to make assumptions before being able to critique such a design. As it stands now, assuming I understood the proposal correctly, it might work for some rifles, but there are a number of SMG designs which it would not work, as well as virtually all pistols.
The fourth relates to the picture. What are the red and yellow lines supposed to represent, and why are they located where they are on the rifle platform? Again, absent more information to clarify things, one is forced to make certain assumptions. So far, it would seem to suggest that instead of having the magazine well located where it currently is immediately in front of the trigger guard, the idea it to have the magazine well moved forward to feed into the barrel. Is this correct?
