Go Back   DefenceTalk Forum - Military & Defense Forums > Global Defense & Military > Space & Defense Technology

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence


Anti-STEALTH?

This is a discussion on Anti-STEALTH? within the Space & Defense Technology forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; How can stealth aircraft be detected nowadays? Any good answers? Its for research purposes as im gonna take Military science ...


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old February 4th, 2016   #1
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2
Threads:
Anti-STEALTH?

How can stealth aircraft be detected nowadays?

Any good answers? Its for research purposes as im gonna take Military science soon.

A reminder to all posting in this thread. The posting of one-liners is a violation of Rule 2 of the Forum Rules. On occasion, the Mod Team may tolerate a post with one-line; but not all the time.

For new members or members with less than 50 posts, if you post a one-liner in this thread, it will be deleted. Thank you for your attention.

Last edited by OPSSG; March 8th, 2016 at 07:21 AM.
Gbendicion is offline  
Old February 5th, 2016   #2
Super Moderator
Lieutenant General
No Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,874
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gbendicion View Post
How can stealth aircraft be detected nowadays?

Any good answers? Its for research purposes as im gonna take Military science soon.
http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/ai...tory-lo-10856/

Read that first as it's sort of a primer for how low observability works. As for defeating it, that depends on how the aircraft is evading sensors. If it's using a jammer, for example, that is a different solution and thus requires a different response than if the aircraft is shaped to reduce its radar signature. And remember, low observability doesn't make an aircraft invisible, it simply reduces the signature of the associated vehicle. So low observability or signature management are both more accurate terms than "stealth". That link should give you some ideas as to how it all works (and thus how it might be defeated).
Bonza is offline  
Old February 5th, 2016   #3
Banned Member
Chief Warrant Officer
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Europe
Posts: 449
Threads:
New Radars, IRST Strengthen Stealth-Detection Claims | Technology content from Aviation Week

New radars, IRST, sensor fusion, data linking between jets and ground radar and among the jets themselves...
Toblerone is offline  
Old February 5th, 2016   #4
Super Moderator
Colonel
Preceptor's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grindstone
Posts: 1,509
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toblerone View Post
New Radars, IRST Strengthen Stealth-Detection Claims | Technology content from Aviation Week

New radars, IRST, sensor fusion, data linking between jets and ground radar and among the jets themselves...
Might be worth re-reading Bonza's post, as well as the link he provided. The term, "stealth" is a generic term for what is more accurately a condition, namely Low Observable or LO. It is not a specific or discrete technology set, hence the claims of "anti-stealth" sensors/technology becomes somewhat laughable.
-Preceptor
________________
Forum Rules http://defencetalk.com/forums/rules.php
Read'em, know'em, follow'em!
I am Mr. Grumpy...
Preceptor is offline  
Old February 5th, 2016
Gbendicion
This message has been deleted by OPSSG. Reason: Read the forum rules - no one liners
Old February 10th, 2016   #5
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,997
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toblerone View Post
New Radars, IRST Strengthen Stealth-Detection Claims | Technology content from Aviation Week

New radars, IRST, sensor fusion, data linking between jets and ground radar and among the jets themselves...
LO is a capability - its not a discrete tech set - so the notion that it can be "defeated" ignores the reality of how its evolved in the first place.

Note that as the capability evolves across different tech sets, counter detection and detection also evolves.

none of this is fixed
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM.