Go Back   DefenceTalk Forum - Military & Defense Forums > Global Defense & Military > Navy & Maritime

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence


Argentine navy future

This is a discussion on Argentine navy future within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; @ Gollevainen You say I need to get in the mind set of S. American navies. Your right, I need ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 3.67 average.
Old September 19th, 2006   #46
the corporal
Master Sergeant
Gollevainen's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: somewere in Hame, Finland
Posts: 328
Threads:
Quote:
@ Gollevainen

You say I need to get in the mind set of S. American navies. Your right, I need to understand their needs and geo-political mind set (wether I agree with it or not). So a few questions for you...
Well If you are patient enough to wait untill the next weekend, I will try to awnser you (I need to go trough my sources, mean= I have few good books which gives valuable backup information, but they are in different location than I am at the moment)
________________
Once Gollevainen was biten by snake....

...after ten days of suffering the snake died
Gollevainen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2006   #47
Aussie Digger
Guest
No Avatar
Posts: n/a
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by contedicavour
Not bad for a relatively small and old plane ! Were the NZ A4s just scrapped ? Brazil could have been interested if only NZ scrapped them a bit later... though I'm not sure all A4s could be as easily navalized as those taken by Brazil from Kuwaiti stock.

thks
cheers
No NZ still has them and are trying to find a buyer. They are already Navalised as NZ bought them from Australia after we finished operating them off OUR Carrier...
  Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2006   #48
Banned Member
Major General
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,045
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie Digger
NZ bought them from Australia after we finished operating them off OUR Carrier...
I think AU needs one far more than Argentina ever would.
Big-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2006   #49
Defense Aficionado
Lieutenant General
contedicavour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paris/Geneva (but I'm Italian)
Posts: 2,901
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie Digger
No NZ still has them and are trying to find a buyer. They are already Navalised as NZ bought them from Australia after we finished operating them off OUR Carrier...
Ah-ha I wasn't aware of that ! Well then Brazil should try to make an offer for them if it wants to preserve its small and ageing Skyhawk force airborne for some more time.
Though how old are the NZ A4s... I'm calculating that the last Australian carrier was retired in the early '80s... may be they are too used after all.

cheers
contedicavour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2006   #50
The Wanderer
Major
robsta83's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 932
Threads:
Invincible

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big-E
I think AU needs one far more than Argentina ever would.
Damned Labour government
________________
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
robsta83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2006   #51
Defense Aficionado
Lieutenant General
contedicavour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paris/Geneva (but I'm Italian)
Posts: 2,901
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by robsta83
Damned Labour government
Be happy, your Navy will be again very powerful with the new Aegis DDGs and the 2 huge LPDH planned

cheers
contedicavour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 24th, 2006   #52
the corporal
Master Sergeant
Gollevainen's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: somewere in Hame, Finland
Posts: 328
Threads:
Quote:
You say I need to get in the mind set of S. American navies. Your right, I need to understand their needs and geo-political mind set (wether I agree with it or not). So a few questions for you...
Well like I promised, heres my attempt to try to awnser to your questions...


Quote:
What is the goal of the navies of major S. American nations?
As with any other nations, protect the national intress and show the flag eg. power to other countries. What makes the Latin america different than in other parts of the world is the unique geopolitical situation. USA has considered the both american continents as their "own backyards" keeping other major powers out there. This has generated some sort of "greenhouse" world to the south american countries where they are quite free to focus on each others without intervention of other global players. The four major players in the area, Argentina, Peru, Brazil and Chile have been rivaling with each others (and formed "a pairs" like Brazil vs. Argentina and Chile vs. Peru) As the only reasonble military thread comes from the neighbouring country (USA keeping the Soviets and others away) it makes some the "rules" bit different than with other navies. The mahanian type of direct rivaling between two nations have remained considerably longer than in other parts of the world.

Quote:
What are the threats they face?
Like I said, each others, Argentina has Brazil as it's main rival, but also Chile which has also Peru as it's opponent.

Quote:
How does a carrier integrate into these threats?
Quite well. Like the Dreadnouhts in the "good old days" they are powerfull "penis-extensions" with this sort of enviroment. Argentina and Brazil have managed to aquire ones and Chile was offered the HMS Hermes (eventually went to India) and Peru tried to buy the HMS Bulwark. About the actual usabilty of carriers in such a small countries you can speak in many ways, but if you understand the enviroment of the Latin America, then in fact even the modest type of naval airarm is an advantage agaisnt the opponent.

Quote:
Are these threats outside of land based aircraft?
Yeas and no. None of the South american countries have a good longrange land based aircrafts able to fullfill the strike and Airdefence for the naval units. Argentinian Skyhawks where able to attack against Brazilian and Chilean warhsips even if those where of the range of land bases as they where launched from the carrier. And as the SAM assets of both Chilean and Brazilian navies where pretty inadequate, the effect of the Skyhaws shouldn't be underestimated.

Quote:
Are the tempos needed going to be met by a Foch style carrier?
Yeas, as it's considerably bigger than the earlier light fleet carriers being used by Argentina and Brazil. The only difference is that now Brazil have the advantage over Argentina as the later has no carrier. If Argentina would have a carrier with better airassets than the Skyhawks, it would again resume the advantage it once had. Is it reasonable? Perhaps not if you look the matter in the eyes of non-latin american but apparently the wievs haven't changed. My quess that the only matter that prevents Argentina to field a new carrier is money...
________________
Once Gollevainen was biten by snake....

...after ten days of suffering the snake died
Gollevainen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 26th, 2006   #53
Defense Aficionado
Lieutenant General
contedicavour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paris/Geneva (but I'm Italian)
Posts: 2,901
Threads:
If the purpose of a carrier is to create local advantage over any other South American navy, then I have 2 objections

(i) the other navies would do better to invest in second-hand DDGs, just as Chile has done with the ex Dutch Heemsmerk. There are now several Type 42s and 2 Audace DDGs available. These ships with Standard SM1 and Aspide or Sea Sparrow (or Sea Dart for the T42s) are enough to shoot down half a dozen carrier-embarked Skyhawks such as the Brazilian ones.

(ii) politically, Latin American countries are now very close to each other and historical conflicts such as Argentine vs Chile have died down. The only remaining hotspots are Chile vs Bolivia (hardly a naval confrontation) or Peru vs Ecuador (with Peru's navy being several times larger and more efficient) or Colombia vs Venezuela. I don't see Brazil or Argentina (the 2 countries which have or have had carriers) threatening anybody or being threatened by anybody.

cheers
contedicavour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 28th, 2008   #54
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 111
Threads:
If Argentina is really interested in getting an aircraft carrier they should try and get a deal like India got with the Admiral Gorshkov. Maybe a purchase of 24-36 rafales would convince France to give them the clemenceau. 12 going to the navy and the rest to the air force. Then they could finally get rid of Mirage IIIs and relegate A-4s and super etendards to an attack role. Probably not enough money for this though.
kilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2008   #55
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 122
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilo View Post
If Argentina is really interested in getting an aircraft carrier they should try and get a deal like India got with the Admiral Gorshkov.
I think the last thing that the Argentinians (or anyone else) needs is a deal like the one India got with the Admiral Gorshkov. Cost overruns, constantly shifting delivery dates and capability gaps. Really, not a good idea.

WillS
www.boilingthefrog.co.uk
WillS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2008   #56
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
Musashi_kenshin's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 689
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilo View Post
Maybe a purchase of 24-36 rafales would convince France to give them the clemenceau. 12 going to the navy and the rest to the air force. Then they could finally get rid of Mirage IIIs and relegate A-4s and super etendards to an attack role. Probably not enough money for this though.
You're also assuming the French would deliberately try to piss the UK off when they're trying to get Anglo co-operation over projects like the future aircraft carrier. At the moment Argentina can't offer anything that France really wants.
Musashi_kenshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2008   #57
Super Moderator
General
swerve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 6,684
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilo View Post
If Argentina is really interested in getting an aircraft carrier they should try and get a deal like India got with the Admiral Gorshkov. Maybe a purchase of 24-36 rafales would convince France to give them the clemenceau. 12 going to the navy and the rest to the air force. ....
I doubt Clemenceau is fit to restore to service. She was stripped of everything of value, & sent for scrapping in 2005. If it hadn't been for the fuss over the asbestos & other unpleasant substances aboard, her steel would have been re-used two years ago, but instead, she's been rusting at anchor.
swerve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2008   #58
Senior Member
Major
harryriedl's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,018
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
I doubt Clemenceau is fit to restore to service. She was stripped of everything of value, & sent for scrapping in 2005. If it hadn't been for the fuss over the asbestos & other unpleasant substances aboard, her steel would have been re-used two years ago, but instead, she's been rusting at anchor.
also the similar issue with the LPD which had to be sent back to France which Argentina were meant to have but said no because of the Asbestos problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouragan..._platform_dock
________________
Colin McRae 1961-2007 true champion
Unofficial Royal navy cheering section
harryriedl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 29th, 2008   #59
jints
Lieutenant
radiosilence's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 615
Threads:
I don't think the Argentina will go for a aircraft carrier any time soon. They can't afford it right now. Argentina recently announced plans to jointly build nuclear subs with Brazil which will use up a lot of its limited resources.

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php...70&c=SEA&s=AME
radiosilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1st, 2008   #60
Defense Aficionado
Lieutenant General
contedicavour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paris/Geneva (but I'm Italian)
Posts: 2,901
Threads:
The Clemenceau's rusting hulk isn't going anywhere. I saw it rusting in Bretagne next to a lot of other old 50s and 60s destroyer escorts.

It is however Brazil that should receive some used Super Etendards as the French Navy receives more Rafales. Super Etendards with SEM modernization will certainly help beyond the very limited capabilities of the A4s.

cheers
contedicavour is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.