Tactics

[Abrams 2.0]

I think that the Geneava( i may or may not have spelled that right,) convention inhibits almost all factors of military action in the field.
For instance, we are not allowed to interrogate( interrogate being a polite word for torture) an enemy prisoner, who, keep in mind, may have sanctioned an operation that sends a suicide bomber into multiple soldiers, killing or wounding all. I think that is complete bull, and that the convention should repeal this. I'd be happy to have your views on this, so please. continue the thread. I got thei title wrong, it should be "interrogation inhibitions"



Mod edit:

I don't think this thread is going anywhere. Perhaps you should consider whether YOU would like the protection of the Geneva Convention if YOU were a soldier and captured...

Threads closed.

AD

 

[XaNDeR]

And why would that even matter , there have been and will be far more effective ways of the enemy telling the TRUTH as it is to torture someone.