Lifted from the RN discussion thread, I just thought it may be worth some further discussion in a more appropriate location.
"I know the Jaguar was not a purple asset, it was however a superb CAS platform, probably superior to the Harrier, and was missed more by the Army than the RAF. The real shame was the Jag was an icon in sustainability with the upgrade and support model adopted, using MOTS solutions to counter obsolescence issues support costs were dropping as performance was improving, it could have easily and affordably served until the Typhoon if not the F-35 was ready to replace it."
The Jag was retired early in April 2007 as a cost saving measure but still had a lot of life left in it. There were numerous affordable upgrades available that could have ensured it remained useful well into this decade when a more suitable replacement than the Tornado became available.
In fact I can not help but wonder if the Jag, Harrier and Sea harrier had all been retained and upgraded to remain viable until the F-35A and B became available it would have been money well spent.
Where would the money have come from, scraping the Tornado and not bothering upgrading it and not buying Storm Shadow. The Tornado would have made been superfluous with the capability of the improved Jags and Harriers, their greater deployability, lower operating costs (i.e.) Harriers operating from carriers off the cost of the target nation rather than flying from the UK and firing cruise missiles) and an increased Tomahawk buy for the subs and perhaps for Mk41 equipped Type 45s. With the money saved retiring the Tornados an additional couple of type 45s may have been affordable.
I could be way off the mark but I am sure you gentlemen will set me straight soon enough if I am.
"I know the Jaguar was not a purple asset, it was however a superb CAS platform, probably superior to the Harrier, and was missed more by the Army than the RAF. The real shame was the Jag was an icon in sustainability with the upgrade and support model adopted, using MOTS solutions to counter obsolescence issues support costs were dropping as performance was improving, it could have easily and affordably served until the Typhoon if not the F-35 was ready to replace it."
The Jag was retired early in April 2007 as a cost saving measure but still had a lot of life left in it. There were numerous affordable upgrades available that could have ensured it remained useful well into this decade when a more suitable replacement than the Tornado became available.
In fact I can not help but wonder if the Jag, Harrier and Sea harrier had all been retained and upgraded to remain viable until the F-35A and B became available it would have been money well spent.
Where would the money have come from, scraping the Tornado and not bothering upgrading it and not buying Storm Shadow. The Tornado would have made been superfluous with the capability of the improved Jags and Harriers, their greater deployability, lower operating costs (i.e.) Harriers operating from carriers off the cost of the target nation rather than flying from the UK and firing cruise missiles) and an increased Tomahawk buy for the subs and perhaps for Mk41 equipped Type 45s. With the money saved retiring the Tornados an additional couple of type 45s may have been affordable.
I could be way off the mark but I am sure you gentlemen will set me straight soon enough if I am.