Bookmark us: | Register TodayUpload Media

Defence Poll

How to properly exit Iraq?
 
Home arrowGlobal Defence News arrow Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear Weapons News

Gates Says Nuclear Mission Shortcomings Caused Air Force Dismissals

US Department of Defense | Jun 11, 2008
 Share & Bookmark
 Digg   Reddit   Del.icio.us   Stumble It!   Email Article

LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE: If it were not for the serious decline in the Air Force’s nuclear mission focus and performance, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said here today, he would not have felt the need to replace the Air Force leadership.

Gates asked for and received the resignations of Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. T. Michael Moseley on June 6 in the wake of an investigation that found problems with the focus, performance and effective leadership of the service’s nuclear weapons program.

Speaking to airmen and Air Force civilians of Air Combat Command, Gates called the nuclear mission the Air Force’s most sensitive one. “The mere existence of weapons with such destructive power alters the international landscape – and rightfully brings much scrutiny to bear on how they are handled,” Gates said.

Today, he recommended that Michael B. Donley be nominated to replace Wynne and that Gen. Norton A. Schwartz replace Moseley. White House officials announced today President Bush’s intention to nominate Donley and to designate him as acting Air Force secretary.

Two instances highlighted the nuclear failures. In one, a B-52 crew unknowingly carried six nuclear weapons from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barksdale Air Force Base, La. In another incident, nose cones for Minuteman missiles mistakenly were delivered to Taiwan in place of helicopter batteries. More than a year elapsed before the error became known.

In light of these failures, Gates asked Navy Adm. Kirkland Donald to evaluate the system. He found three systemic problems.

“The Air Force does not have a clear, dedicated authority responsible for the nuclear enterprise who sets and maintains rigorous standards of operations,” Gates said.

Second, he said, the failures that led to the nose-cone misshipment could have been prevented had existing controls been followed.

Finally, “the investigation confirmed a decline in Air Force nuclear expertise similar to findings in other, earlier reports,” Gates said. In addition, the nuclear mission has not received adequate funding for years, he said.

Gates said the decisive action was needed because Air Force leadership allowed the service’s focus to drift away from the nuclear mission. They also allowed performance standards to decline, and they did not identify these problems for correction, the secretary said.

“The Air Force’s investigation into what went wrong did not get to the root causes, requiring my personal intervention,” he said.

Gates has stressed accountability with all services. He encouraged all servicemembers to assess their jobs, take accountability for what they can and ensure that changes outside their purview receive the appropriate attention.

“The important thing is to have an open and respectful airing of views in good faith,” Gates said. “When decisions are made, everyone – both civilian and military – must do his or her part to see them through to success,” he said. (


  Find out more...   Do more...   Spread the word...
Website Link
Sorry, no related link found. Suggest?
Pictures
US Military
Discussions
Air Force/Military Aviation
Videos
Military Videos
Factsheet
Weapons Database
 Latest Military Videos
 Related Discussions
Air Systems - Bombers
B-1A
Air Systems - Bombers
FB-111
Air Systems - Bombers
B-70 Valkyrie
Air Systems - Bombers
XB-68
Air Systems - Bombers
B-66 Destroyer & A3D Skywarrior

More Military Videos
Get the DefenceTalk updates in your e-mail!
Be one of the 22,000+ users who Subscribe to our Daily Defence News Newsletter, Free! Privacy Policy
Advertisement | Advertise with us

The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of Defencetalk.com. These are offered as a means for Defencetalk.com to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational website/organization.
The DefenceTalk.com site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. DefenceTalk.com is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of defence, military, world strategic developments, anti-terrorism issues and tactics, humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Translate this Page

Webpage Tools

Our Supporters

Join a military forum today at VAJoe.com and while there check out information about the GI Bill

Search Defence News