Bookmark us: | Register TodayUpload Media

Defence Poll

How to properly exit Iraq?
 
Home arrowGlobal Defence News arrow Defence & Security
Defence & Security News

No signs Russia will tear up arms control treaties: US

Agence France-Presse | Aug 27, 2008
 Share & Bookmark
 Digg   Reddit   Del.icio.us   Stumble It!   Email Article

Washington: The United States said Monday there were no indications Russia would renege on arms reduction pacts, such as the START I nuclear weapons treaty, following the conflict over Georgia but warned that such a move "will be crossing a new threshold."

"We don't have any indication that the Russians plan to move away from agreements like the START treaty or Moscow treaty or the INF agreement," said Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security John Rood.

"And I think that would have obvious implications, not only for the United States relationship, but for relations with a lot of other countries," he said when asked about the prospect of Moscow tearing up arms reduction pacts amid increasingly tense relations after Russian troops moved into Georgia.

Aside from the START I treaty aimed at limiting each side's intercontinental nuclear arsenals, the United States and Russia have a Strategic Offensive Reductions (SORT) or Moscow Treaty and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).

Rood noted that talks on issues of strategic security between the two sides "occurred even in the toughest times of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union" and he expected the situation to remain the same.

"Russia is not the Soviet Union. But, nonetheless, I think we would still want to have a dialogue, have an ongoing conversation with the Russian government about strategic security issues," he added.

Russian troops rolled into Georgia on August 8 to fight off a Georgian offensive to retake the pro-Russian breakaway South Ossetia. They have since refused to completely withdraw under a peace plan brokered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Following Western condemnations, Moscow has threatened to cut off links with NATO and has already broken off some trade agreements reached during negotiations for it to join the World Trade Organisation.

Rood said that the Russians, prior to the Georgian conflict, had "expressed strong interest in a new treaty as a follow on to the START agreement, which expires next year.

He pointed out that Washington was similarly keen on such a deal even though it had made it clear that it would not be "business as usual" with Moscow unless Russian troops withdrew from Georgia and abided by the ceasefire.

"We in the United States have an interest in pursuing that. We remain interested in negotiating such an agreement with the Russians, he said.

"I don't think that has changed and also I would hasten to add what we have said is that 'we are not going to conduct business as usual with Russia.'"

Rood said that based on Russia's last START declarations, it had about 850 intercontinental ballistic missiles or ICBMs.

The missiles, he pointed out, were not threatened by a recently signed US-Poland plan to base 10 interceptor missiles in the ex-communist nation.

"Ten interceptors versus that force, with thousands of nuclear warheads, is not a credible threat. And it's not intended to be one," Rood said.

Moscow is deeply opposed to the missile plan.


  Find out more...   Do more...   Spread the word...
Website Link
Sorry, no related link found. Suggest?
Pictures
US Military, Russian Military
Discussions
Defense Forum
Videos
Military Videos
Factsheet
Weapons Database
 Latest Military Videos
 Related Discussions
Air Systems - Bombers
B-1A
Air Systems - Bombers
FB-111
Air Systems - Bombers
B-70 Valkyrie
Air Systems - Bombers
XB-68
Air Systems - Bombers
B-66 Destroyer & A3D Skywarrior

More Military Videos
Get the DefenceTalk updates in your e-mail!
Be one of the 22,000+ users who Subscribe to our Daily Defence News Newsletter, Free! Privacy Policy
Advertisement | Advertise with us

The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of Defencetalk.com. These are offered as a means for Defencetalk.com to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational website/organization.
The DefenceTalk.com site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. DefenceTalk.com is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of defence, military, world strategic developments, anti-terrorism issues and tactics, humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Translate this Page

Webpage Tools

Our Supporters

Join a military forum today at VAJoe.com and while there check out information about the GI Bill

Search Defence News