Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Space & Defense Technology
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Ansat-U_taking_off_2.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off_1.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off.jpg

KAMAZ-65225.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





US Military using teleport in Australia

This is a discussion on US Military using teleport in Australia within the Space & Defense Technology forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by StingrayOZ Guam has a large military presence on Guam. Australia has its own capable defences. While telecommunication ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 1.00 average.
Old August 8th, 2011   #16
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by StingrayOZ View Post
Guam has a large military presence on Guam. Australia has its own capable defences. While telecommunication networks might sweeten them slightly as targets, the communication links are redundant. So even nuking entire facilities would merely result in traffic being switched else where.

There are way bigger targets in both of these locations than this. To take either would be a huge effort.
Oh I see. Thanks for explaining. So basically it would be quite a dead-end for anyone with terror plots.
marlonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 8th, 2011   #17
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,239
Threads:
Guam is essentially a military base already. Its US territory, has i dunno 10,000+ US military personel. Carriers, USMC amphibs and the USAF often base out of Guam. It would be akin to trying to attack a huge military staging point on US soil.

Australia's communication stations are very remote, and include things like echelon stations etc. Most of the important bits are fortified, and behind multiple fences km away from the actual sites. Usually manned by US and sometimes US and Australian personel. These sites probably have as their biggest threats all out nuclear attack by ICBM's, because thats the level you would have to go to take them out.

Terrorists would find a lot softer target than that. Usually civilian or troops moving about in unarmoured humves.
StingrayOZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 9th, 2011   #18
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Threads:
Cool

Yeah, I do think it's going to take so much to disrupt satellite communications especially remote areas. Terrorists are most likely going to look for easier targets anyway.
marlonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2011   #19
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Normally that would not be a valid reply to a post, but I'd feel ashamed to make that statement after my last post... Anyways.

To respond to the original topic: while the US may or may not be building a teleport in Australia, I think it's safe to say that it's highly unlikely. Please continue discussing satellite communications and disregard the last few posts.
I think I found a video to it as well. ‪The advantages and benefits of Australian Teleports‬‏ - YouTube.
marlonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2011   #20
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 730
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlonb View Post
Yeah, I do think it's going to take so much to disrupt satellite communications especially remote areas. Terrorists are most likely going to look for easier targets anyway.
Terrorists need headlines stoke their egos and bring in recruits/groupies. Taking out a military telecommunications hub probably would not even make page 6 in the papers and be ignored by the others unless there is a high body count or they use a nuke.
My2Cents is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10th, 2011
marlonb
This message has been deleted by OPSSG. Reason: Violation of forum rules: No one-liners
Old August 10th, 2011   #21
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlonb View Post
Wouldn't that pose a threat to the location, for example in Guam or Australia? You know, make them a lot more appealing as a target?
I suppose that any US military installation, or overseas national asset, is a target. I also believe that the US operates under this assumption at all times.
Deterrence Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11th, 2011
marlonb
This message has been deleted by OPSSG. Reason: Violation of forum rules: No one-liners
Old August 16th, 2011   #22
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
Kirkzzy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 283
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waylander View Post
Are you talking about the teleporters I have in mind?

"Beam me up Scotty..."
My heard my heart beat when I first saw this thread, with that in mind.
Kirkzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2011   #23
Defense Enthusiast
Lieutenant
ngatimozart's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 541
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waylander View Post
Are you talking about the teleporters I have in mind?

"Beam me up Scotty..."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirkzzy View Post
My heard my heart beat when I first saw this thread, with that in mind.
Mine too. But I had read an article in Science in 2000 where they had managed to teleport a photo from one side of a lab to another. It is all about information according to the article. Methinks I wouldn't want to be the guinea pig for the human test. No guarantee that you would rematerialise in exact same condition you were before you teleported. A pity though - think of all the time saved not having to wait around in airports.
ngatimozart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2011   #24
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 13
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngatimozart View Post
Mine too. But I had read an article in Science in 2000 where they had managed to teleport a photo from one side of a lab to another. It is all about information according to the article. Methinks I wouldn't want to be the guinea pig for the human test. No guarantee that you would rematerialise in exact same condition you were before you teleported. A pity though - think of all the time saved not having to wait around in airports.
Me too. Haha. I mean, whoever is willing to be the first to be teleported somewhere else has my admiration. But I think I'd rather stick to the military teleports than transmitted somewhere else on earth or in space.
marlonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2011
KONTAKT UFO
This message has been deleted by Bonza. Reason: obvious troll is obvious
Old October 17th, 2011
lizaright
This message has been deleted by Bonza. Reason: spammer, posts deleted and user banned
Reply

Tags
teleport, us military

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.