Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Space & Defense Technology
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Ansat-U_taking_off_2.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off_1.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off.jpg

KAMAZ-65225.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Pentagon building new 15 ton bomb.

This is a discussion on Pentagon building new 15 ton bomb. within the Space & Defense Technology forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by IronsightSniper The easiest solution would to be just dig under 60 meters, but how the IADS deal ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 1.00 average.
Old January 16th, 2011   #46
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 730
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronsightSniper View Post
The easiest solution would to be just dig under 60 meters, but how the IADS deal with it is the first line of trouble.
That is 60 meters of rock equivalent to reinforced concrete. So you need to dig that far into bedrock, not just beneath the surface. Well OK, you can count part of the overburden, say 20 to 25% if it is really thick. And 60 meters is just the depth that the bomb will penetrate to, you also have the effects of 2.4 tons of highly tamped HE to consider.

And below the bedrock means that the bunker will automatically be below the water table, so if it is cracked by a near miss flooding will be a major problem.
My2Cents is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 11th, 2011   #47
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 122
Threads:
I've read that they are working on the next generation of penetrators which will be in the 3000lb-class or thereabouts which will have rocket boost to increase velocity and achieve greater penetration.
The smaller size and weight means that strike fighters will have a significantly increased ability to take out hardened, subsurface targets complementing the bomber force. I'm curious though if they will be able to cram it into the F-35 weapons bay?
wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011   #48
Junior Member
Private First Class
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 59
Threads:
Is the US military looking for a non-nuclear way to defeat ICBM silos? I Reckon A Nation-state war is getting a new contigency plan ^^
Armoredpriapism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011
lizaright
This message has been deleted by Bonza. Reason: spammer, posts deleted and user banned
Old October 30th, 2011
PHySlCz
This message has been deleted by OPSSG. Reason: Post whoring is not encouraged
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 AM.