Interesting navigation techniques

phreeky

Active Member
For some reason I was wondering whether anyone had tried automated navigation based on stars, given the more recent advances in a number of areas:
- digital camera image quality and resolution
- computer processing power

...and the methods in which they could be combined - knowledge of the stars expected positions combined with these high quality cameras capabilities.

I promptly googled and came across this: http://www.prc68.com/I/MD1.shtml

I find it really interesting, probably nothing knew to those who've dealt with navigation systems a lot.

Is this stuff still used at all, given GPS technology? Is it considered a backup solution at all, or is the level of redundancy in GPS technology so extreme that it's void of purpose? Any other intriguing navigation concepts?
 

Systems Adict

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
It makes for interesting reading, your link, that is.

However, it's fair to say that the MD-1 was invented in an era when computational power / speed / size, were not on a par with today's levels. Many electronics manufacturer's even state facts like...

" Today our state of the art digital watch has 10 times the computational power & memory of the computers that helped put Neil Armstrong on the moon".

You must understand that an item that was designed & built nearly 50 years ago relies on techniques & technology that is at least 50 years old.

This doesn't however make the item inaccurate, but the advances in technology, added to the accuracy, do.

Let's look at GPS. It's a bunch of 40 odd satellites (if not more) that are in a geo-stationary orbit, at various points around the planet. Using trigonometry & computational speed, they transmit signals to other equipment (your dashboard mounted GPS receiver here on earth perhaps?).
This equipment then process the information from a group of satellites that are within reception range, to help give an approximate reading of position to within 40 - 50 metres (for domestic / general public use).

This accuracy can be "tweaked", to make the figure less accurate, or more accurate in the case of military equipment/systems.

However, GPS is not the be all & end all system. Any sailor/pilot worth his salt will use in conjunction with GPS, a back up system.
This can be other "space based" satellite systems, such as the old Decca system, or more commonly, Loran 'C'. These systems are also backed up by ground based radio transmission systems, or a human operator.

Finally, most sailors & pilots still rely on paper charts, as they're low tech & are not affected by power loss ! Some others may still use a sextant, to look at the stars, to double check their facts.

Technology is a tool to be used. If it takes some of the difficulty out of the thought processes needed to complete a particular task, then the reduced effort needed to complete the task makes it seem easier. While making the task seem easier, it's also giving you the room to concentrate more on other tasks at the same time, or possibly allowing you to focus more on one critical task.

Your Thoughts......?

Systems Adict :)
 

phreeky

Active Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
Thanks, that's impressive..........my googling didn't bring me to any up-to-date systems, and silly me hadn't even considered how much space systems must rely on stars.

I also wasn't aware it maybe (definately IS?) used on ICBMs, as you say as one of several nav systems - you'd wanna be bloody sure it's heading in the right direction!

Is there any info you know of regarding its accuracy and sea level? I'm curious as to its importance in an era where we rely so much on GPS navigation, a reliance which will surely grow, would there be a market (specifically defence wise) for systems utilising such a concept as backup to GPS - lets assume anti-satellite weapons become highly effective and available in the future.
 

Grand Danois

Entertainer
I found this on FAS.org. Covers the subject, including the use of GPS.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/basics.htm

"Guidance System

The guidance system in a missile can be compared to the human pilot of an airplane. Every missile guidance system consists of an attitude control system and a flight path control system. The attitude control system functions to maintain the missile in the desired attitude on the ordered flight path by controlling the missile in pitch, roll, and yaw. The attitude control system operates as an auto-pilot, damping out fluctuations that tend to deflect the missile from its ordered flight path. The function of the flight path control system is to determine the flight path necessary for target interception and to generate the orders to the attitude control system to maintain that path.

The operation of a guidance and control system is based on the principle of feedback. The control units make corrective adjustments of the missile control surfaces when a guidance error is present. The control units will also adjust the control to stabilize the missile in roll, pitch, and yaw. Guidance and stabilization corrections are combined, and the result is applied as an error signal to the control system.

The heart of the inertial navigation system for missiles is an arrangement of accelerometers that will detect any change in vehicular motion. An accelerometer, as its name implies, is a device for mea-suring acceleration. In their basic form such devices are sim-ple. For example, a pendulum, free to swing on a transverse axis, could be used to measure acceleration along the fore-and-aft axis of the missile. When the missile is given a forward acceleration, the pendulum will tend to lag aft; the actual displacement of the pendulum form its original position will be a function of the magnitude of the accelerating force. The movement of the mass (weight) is in accordance with Newton's second law of motion, which states that the acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the force applied and inversely proportional to the mass of the body.

Usually there are three double-integrating accelerometers continuously measuring the distance traveled by the missile in three directions--range, altitude, and azimuth. Double-integrating accelerometers are devices that are sensitive to acceleration, and by a double-step process measure distance. These measured distances are then compared with the desired dis-tances, which are preset into the missile; if the missile is off course, correction signals are sent to the control system. If the missile speed were constant, the distance covered could be calculated simply by multiplying the speed by time of flight. But because the acceleration varies, the speed also varies. For that reason, the second integration is necessary.

When targets are located at great distances from the launching site, some form of navigational guidance must be used. Accuracy at long distances is achieved only after exacting and comprehensive calculations of the flight path have been made. Navigational systems that may be used for long-range missile guidance include inertial and celestial.

* Inertial guidance. The simplest principle for guidance is the law of inertia. In aiming a basketball at a basket, an attempt is made to give the ball a trajectory that will terminate in the basket. However, once the ball is released, the shooter has no further control over it. If he has aimed incorrectly, or if the ball is touched by another person, it will miss the bas-ket. However, it is possible for the ball to be incorrectly aimed and then have another person touch it to change its course so it will hit the basket. In this case, the second player has provided a form of guidance. The inertial guidance system sup-plies the intermediate push to get the missile back on the proper trajectory. The inertial guidance method is used for the same purpose as the preset method and is actually a refinement of that method. The inertially guided missile also receives programmed informa-tion prior to launch. Although there is no electromagnetic contact between the launching site and the missile after launch, the missile is able to make corrections to its flight path with amazing precision, controlling the flight path with accelerometers that are mounted on a gyro-stabilized platform. All in-flight accelerations are continuously measured by this arrangement, and the missile attitude control generates corresponding correction signals to maintain the proper trajectory. The use of inertial guidance takes much of the guesswork out of long-range missile delivery. The unpredictable outside forces working on the missile are continuously sensed by the accelerometers. The genera-ted solution enables the missile to continuously correct its flight path. The inertial method has proved far more reliable than any other long-range guidance method developed to date.

* Celestial Reference. A celestial navigation guidance system is a system designed for a predetermined path in which the missile course is adjusted continuously by reference to fixed stars. The system is based on the known apparent positions of stars or other celestial bodies with respect to a point on the surface of the earth at a given time. Navigation by fixed stars and the sun is highly desirable for long-range missiles since its accuracy is not dependent on range. The missile must be provided with a horizontal or a vertical reference to the earth, automatic star-tracking telescopes to determine star elevation angles with respect to the reference, a time base, and navigational star tables mechanically or electrically recorded. A computer in the missile continuously compares star observations with the time base and the navigational tables to determine the missile's present position. From this, the proper signals are computed to steer the missile correctly toward the target. The missile must carry all this complicated equipment and must fly above the clouds to assure star visibility. Celestial guidance (also called stellar guidance) was used for the Mariner (unmanned spacecraft) interplanetary mission to the vicinity of Mars and Venus. ICBM and SLBM systems at present use celestial guidance.

* Command Guidance Multi-source radio signals that allow a triangulation of position offer an alterna-tive to acceleration measurements. Advanced missile powers dropped radio guidance in the 1960’s and switched to autonomous inertial measuring units, which are carried onboard the missile. The United States considered radio guidance again in the late 1980’s for mobile missiles but dropped the idea in favor of a Global Positioning System (GPS). A radio guidance system could transmit signals from the launch site, or an accurate transmitter array near the launch site to create the signals. Radio command and control schemes, because of the immediate presence of a radio signal when the system is turned on, alert defenses that a missile launch is about to occur. And performance for these systems degrades because of the rocket plume and radio noise. Also, these systems are very much subject to the effects of jamming or false signals.

Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) are unlikely ever to be used in the control function of a ballistic missile. The best military grade GPS receivers produce positions with an uncertainty of tens of centimeters. If a missile has two of these receivers in its airframe spaced 10 meters apart, the best angular resolution is roughly in the centiradian range. Theater ballistic missiles [TBMs] require milliradian range angular accuracy to maintain control. However, GPS has significant application for an TBM outfitted with a post-boost vehicle (bus) or attitude control module that navigates a reentry vehicle to a more accurate trajectory."

Btw, the last sentence adresses the issue of accuracy of single staged TBM's, discussed in one of numerous Taiwan Strait Scenario threads.
 

Truculent

New Member
In civil aviation the current level of nav technology is gps irs.This is a combination of the gps signal and inertial reference systems.The irs are no longer spinning gyros but use a laser sent around a triangular course.They are very accurate and due to their lack of moving parts very reliable.
Typical accuracy is within 8 metres of the estimated position.
The widespread production of accelerometers for car airbags has allowed some avionics manufacturers to produce a standby artificial horizon that can be coupled to a gps receiver,and which will run for 24 hours on a watch battery!
 
Top