Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Space & Defense Technology
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Ansat-U_taking_off_2.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off_1.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off.jpg

KAMAZ-65225.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Concurrent electromagnetic design of modern ship projects

This is a discussion on Concurrent electromagnetic design of modern ship projects within the Space & Defense Technology forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; There are a number of issues to consider in the electromacnetic design of ships. The design process should encompass the ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old January 11th, 2004   #1
Defense Enthusiast
Lieutenant
No Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 530
Threads:
Concurrent electromagnetic design of modern ship projects

There are a number of issues to consider in the electromacnetic design of ships. The design process should encompass the entire ship project evolution and focus on the optimisation of both electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and the radar cross-section (RCS) aspects.



The problem of matching the requirements of modern naval units with the growing number of electronic systems, together with survivability requirements, imposes the need for significant improvements in the approach to the electromagnetic (EM) design of new ship platforms. Significant EM design (see Figure 1) is a relatively recent discipline, which has evolved as a consequence of the improvements in the hardware tools available to support complex analyses required by the EM designer moving from the experimental approach through to the extended and systematic use of prediction tools. Stringent design requirements and changes to procurement strategies introduced the need to anticipate significant risks at the earliest stage of a project, and to design effective solutions for reducing and controlling their impact as changes get introduced through the ship design cycle.

Cooperation

It is evident that the solution to these problems must be pursued in a concurrent way, through cooperation between naval architects, mission planners and the EM design team. This kind of cooperation must start from the outset of the ship design process, when the preliminary design is carried out and where the major architecture, weapon and sensor choices are often made. During this initial stage, the timely contributions from the different engineering disciplines are more demanding but provide greatest benefits to the ship project. To be effective, these interactions must continue throughout the project development and up to delivery.

It is well known how the definition of structural details as well as construction tolerances can influence the ship radar signature and, to a lesser extent, the EMC effectiveness. For such design considerations, a primary consideration is given today to the extensive use of numerical simulation, which can provide the easiest, and sometimes only, means for supporting the design of complex ship systems. To be effective, a prediction system should combine all of the features required for the use of the computational electromagnetic solvers and the specific features for concurrent design into an integrated framework to provide a unified environment for the electromagnetic design. In this framework, the ship CAD drawings and related combat system information are shared by the different EM analysis areas (EMC, signature), and are fully open to import from or export to other ship project areas as required.

Experience shows that very often, naval architects, ship design specialists, RCS and EMC engineers act independently and, in many cases, lose the ability to optimise the ship’s configuration through balanced judgement and compromise. To achieve the best solution, the following should be provided to the naval engineer:

Control of the configuration of the ‘ship system’. The framework must be capable of providing project management services to organise all of the EM analyses during the ship project evolution. The framework must also supply configuration control aids on the ship architectural (shapes, materials) and electromagnetic (fields, signatures) database, in order to keep track and have a synthetic vision of the electromagnetic performance of each project version.

Open and integrated modelling environment. The geometric and electromagnetic characterisation of the ship model should be performed in a unified CAD environment, closely interfaced to the CAD drawings that may be defined and manipulated using the different 3D modelling tools used by naval architects.

Advanced electromagnetic codes. The system must have the complex set of state-of-the-art techniques needed for the electromagnetic computations (radiated/scattered fields) embedded into it. The system must also provide advanced simulations of all the aspects related to ship electromagnetic design, exploiting the capabilities of modern hardware resources to reduce computation time. _ There are a number of issues to consider in the electromagnetic design of ships.The design process should encompass the entire ship project evolution and focus on the optimisation of both electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and the radar cross-section (RCS) aspects.
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Dr Stefano Chiti,
Manager

http://www.armedforces-int.com/artic...&artID=488
suleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When America’s Stealth Monopoly Ends, What's Next? luca28 Air Force & Aviation 120 March 17th, 2009 07:07 AM
Cause of German Tank Success redsoulja Military Strategy and Tactics 129 August 6th, 2007 01:32 AM
Joint Support Ship tender released. PhillTaj Navy & Maritime 22 July 15th, 2006 01:37 PM
Big Battleship Doctrine Defcon 6 Navy & Maritime 15 February 6th, 2006 09:19 PM
Electromagnetic Bomb(E-Bomb) Deeps_Terminato Space & Defense Technology 2 November 10th, 2005 03:28 AM

Old January 11th, 2004   #2
Forum Bouncer
Colonel
Red aRRow's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,409
Threads:
Re: Concurrent electromagnetic design of modern ship projects

Thanks for the article.
Red aRRow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2005   #3
New Member
Private
Kalkara's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane, QLD Australia
Posts: 17
Threads:
Re: Concurrent electromagnetic design of modern ship projects

There are certainly limitations to simulation and modelling. Some events are not foreseeable. Such as the case of the carrier USS Forrestal.

Read the article on the Forrestal Fire http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/...stal-fire.html

What it doesn't tell you is that the 'whooshing' sound was a missile launch from a stationary Skyhawk on deck, which struck another aircraft setting off the primary explosion in the incident. The cause of the unauthorised discharge / missile launch was the shipboard radar sweeped across the deck and the electromagnetic emission was induced into the Skyhawk/missile launch circuit causing a false trigger.

I was unfortunate enough to watch the shipdeck surveillance camera footage of the event which really brings home the safety concerns of poor EMI/EMC design.

The trade off in resistance is detection. It is difficult to build a suitable faraday cage around a vessel AND avoid radar detection. Although ADI's Minehunter is a good example of use of composite material technologies to achieve this ideal. The limitation is ofcourse sheilding the communications and combat systems within the vessel, and exercising EMCON during war time operations.

The AEGIS Destroyers have a lot more gear to contend with, so it quickly becomes a complex system problem. Take a look at the DDG-51 ARLEIGH BURKE-class.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/ddg-51.htm

Every communications system and radar system is an emitter and an inductor of electromagnetic noise. Try keeping this baby quiet. But hey, it's a destroyer. Stealth is not a strong point.

No amount of stealth technology would have assisted The USS Cole.
I call it a floating factory.

Last edited by Kalkara; June 10th, 2005 at 06:19 PM.
Kalkara is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 AM.