|
|
Random Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russia wants French Helicopter Carriers...This is a discussion on Russia wants French Helicopter Carriers... within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; This rumour has had some weight for a while.
TheStar.com | Russia | Russia in talks to buy French helicopter ... |
 |
|
October 3rd, 2009
|
#1
|
|
Banned Member
Private
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 29
|
Russia wants French Helicopter Carriers...
This rumour has had some weight for a while.
TheStar.com | Russia | Russia in talks to buy French helicopter carrier
Is the Russian ship building industry in such a bad state, that developments like the Kiev, Moskva and Ivan Rogov are so beyond its capability, that it has to turn external?
|
|
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2009
|
#2
|
|
Super Moderator
General
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 3,194
|
The Mistral is a different class of ship from the Kiev-class. Those were heavy-cruisers with ASW roles. Second of all the development of a modern equivalent would take a lot of time. 5-10 years. If they are ordered abroad, 2-4 years is a realistic timeframe. Thirdly it's also about getting the technology transfer, so that after the intial purchase of 1-2 ships, another 3-4 would be built in Russia. And of course domestic shipbuilding is notorious for delays, and competency issues. The hope is that foreign competition will do them some good (as well as transfer of technology). I do hope the deal comes through after all, it would be a big boost to the VMF.
|
|
|
|
|
October 5th, 2009
|
#3
|
|
Junior Member
Corporal
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 199
|
If you are going to build some of these in a Russian yard then I believe that Admiralty would be the best bet, they are far and away the best large yard in Russia.
|
|
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#4
|
|
Super Moderator
General
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 3,194
|
Time will tell, but you're probably right. Sevmash isn't likely to land the order, as it's taken some major hits with the Gorshkov issue.
In terms of shipyard status in general iirc Zvezdochka is in good shape. But they mainly do subs.
|
|
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#5
|
|
Junior Member
Master Sergeant
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 345
|
Agree - SevMash is busy with other orders and by the way there other yards in our country. I think Admiralty amd Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
|
|
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#6
|
|
Lurker
General
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,356
|
This has been incompletely reported.
The Russians also made it very clear that they are looking at open tender as they believe that there are similar offerings available from other countries - they made specific mention of The Netherlands and Spain
|
|
__________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#7
|
|
Junior Member
Corporal
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
Time will tell, but you're probably right. Sevmash isn't likely to land the order, as it's taken some major hits with the Gorshkov issue.
In terms of shipyard status in general iirc Zvezdochka is in good shape. But they mainly do subs.
|
Zvezdochka is mainly a repair facility for subs and a yard where they decomission old nuclear subs, they haven't really built anything except a few trawlers, I doubt they counld build a complicated vessel like a LHD.
I really think Admiralty it probably the best bet, they are a well run yard, they build efficiently and I believe have very little problems with corruption. It's a pity that the Ukraine is independant, some of the big yards on the Black Sea could easily build these vessels.
|
|
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#8
|
|
Super Moderator
General
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf0012-aust
This has been incompletely reported.
The Russians also made it very clear that they are looking at open tender as they believe that there are similar offerings available from other countries - they made specific mention of The Netherlands and Spain
|
I ran into articles that spun it both ways. But the ships that Netherlands and Spain can offer would be significantly smaller then the Mistral class. Which is why I'm not even sure how this will go. So far, at least in the press, the Mistral is the favorite.
EDIT: Zvyozdochka also builds new subs quite successfully. Iirc the Project 636 is built there.
|
|
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#9
|
|
Lurker
General
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,356
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
I ran into articles that spun it both ways. But the ships that Netherlands and Spain can offer would be significantly smaller then the Mistral class. Which is why I'm not even sure how this will go. So far, at least in the press, the Mistral is the favorite.
|
The Spanish vessels are comparable in capability to the Mistral. Its not the size of the vessel, its the role of the vessel that counts.
the asset needs to be assessed against the functional requirement. that can be very very different based on what the needs actually are.
|
|
__________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
|
|
|
October 6th, 2009
|
#10
|
|
Super Moderator
General
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 3,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor
... But the ships that Netherlands and Spain can offer would be significantly smaller then the Mistral class. ...
|
Juan Carlos 1 is 30 metres longer, & a few thousand tons heavier, than Mistral. The Netherlands has no amphibious ships the size of Mistral in service, but they can build them. Johann de Witt is not greatly smaller than Mistral, & the builders have designs for larger Enforcer versions.
The planned Dutch JSS is a combined logistical & amphibious transport ship, & is about the size of JC1. A purely amphibious ship based on the same design should not be difficult to build.
|
|
|
|
|
October 7th, 2009
|
#11
|
|
Super Moderator
General
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 3,194
|
Points taken. I guess we'll have to wait and see if anything comes of it.
|
|
|
|
|
October 8th, 2009
|
#12
|
|
New Member
Private
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
|
It will be more a political decision than a purely technical question.
I really think it will be done because this ship is not very expensive (less than 200.000.000 euros) and mostly build using civilian standards, so there are not a lot of highly technical "secrets" and the russion navy will probably adapt some of there communication systems.
And if the russian navy want a first ship very quickly, they can buy the one that is actually in production for e delivery in one or two years only.
|
|
|
|
|
October 14th, 2009
|
#13
|
|
Super Moderator
General
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Under your bed. No seriously, take a look.
Posts: 3,194
|
ÀÐÌÑ-ÒÀÑÑ
Aopparently negotiations are set to begin with France.
|
|
|
|
|
October 15th, 2009
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 800
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Streak
|
IIRC all Kievs and Moskva's were built at Nikolayev in the Ukraine, as were Kuz and Varyag.
|
|
__________________
Trans corpus mortuum (and I mean that!)
|
|
|
October 18th, 2009
|
#15
|
|
New Member
Private
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
|
Lacking the funds.
The Russian Kommersant business daily confirmed on Tuesday the possibility of the deal, but said Russian military experts were skeptical about it.
"The Russian Navy lacks the means to finance even the production of corvettes and missile boats, let alone the purchase of large combat ships," the paper quoted Mikhail Barabanov, science editor of the Eksport Vooruzheny (Arms Export) journal, as saying.
Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Moscow-based Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, said "although the practice of arms imports will become more common in Russia in the future, the Mistral deal is rather questionable from a military standpoint, as well as Russia's hopes for the transfer of advanced technologies from France."
Russia in talks on buying French warship | Navy News at DefenceTalk
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 AM.
|