Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Navy & Maritime
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

ExPB14_JAS-39_Gripen.jpg

ExPB14_Mirage2000.jpg

6_EXPB14_20140729_088_3_RSAF_F16s.jpg

5_EXPB14_20140729_143_3_RSAF_F-15SGs.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates

This is a discussion on Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Protector Update The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 3.75 average.
Old May 16th, 2006   #1
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 48
Threads:
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates

Protector Update
The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to 40 NZLAVs (the Army’s new armoured fighting vehicle) along with an embarked force of up to 250 personnel.

The MRV’s commercial design heritage provides a comfortable and flexible level of accommodation for the embarked force, utilising a series of 12 berth cabins (four sets of bunks three deep) which are located in the superstructure on the same level as the flight deck. The ease of movement for fully equipped troops to or from the flight deck has been emphasised within the design criteria. Movement between decks is provided via two wide stair wells or a large centrally located service elevator.

Separate embarked force messing facilities and recreational areas are provided, including:

a gymnasium,
embarked force administration office,
stores areas,
workshops, and
offices for government agency officials.
The embarked force will also have its own armoury and magazine, located forward on the cargo vehicle deck.

As well as the vehicle lanes (total length 403m), CANTERBURY will be able to embark up to thirty three 20 ft ISO containers, of which eight may contain ammunition. Some of the container points are provided with power sockets to allow connection for Reefer Refrigerated containers. There is also space for up to twenty NATO-standard pallets.

In addition, a separate Hazardous Goods Facility is provided, allowing for 2 x 20ft ISO containers, and dedicated paint and petrol stowages. The Army’s LAVs LOVs and Unimogs run on diesel. Petrol is required for only a limited range of Army equipment (motorcycles, Quads and some generators) and so would be embarked for specific purposes only.

Due to the wide range of cargo that may be present in the Vehicle Deck at any one time extensive firefighting systems are being installed, with smoke and flame monitoring as well a Drencher and Sprinkler systems. Four NH90 Utility Helicopters can be carried in addition to the MRV’s own SH-2G helicopter. All of these aviation spaces are afforded AFFF sprinkler fire protection.


Ship - Shore Transfer System
The new CANTERBURY will have a range of methods for moving cargo and personnel from the ship to shore. ‘Cargo’ will generally be either:

vehicles (i.e. LAVs, LOVs, trucks, earthmoving machinery, or trailers with or without ISO 20 ft containers),
separate ISO containers, or
smaller items.
The various methods for ship/shore movement will be:

load/unload Landing Craft Medium (LCM) via stern ramp,
load/unload LCM via the ship’s 60 tonne capacity cranes, with access through hatches in the flight deck,
load/unload MRV via side and or stern ramp on to a wharf,
load/unload MRV via crane through flightdeck hatches direct to a wharf, or
helicopter under-slung loads.
The ship’s two RHIBs can also be used, for small numbers of personnel.

If the ship can’t get alongside, a key aspect for the MRV operations will be the ability to move vehicles and freight across the hydraulic-controlled stern ramp to the Landing Craft.


CANTERBURY’s LCMs
The Landing Craft Medium (LCMs) are significant vessels in their own right, being 23m long and displacing approximately 55 tonnes when empty. When loaded with 2 NZLAVs an LCM will displace 100 tonnes. Weight limit on the empty weight of the LCM is to enable them to be embarked using the MRVs 60 Tonne crane. (To appreciate the size of the LCM it is worth comparing them to the IPCs, which are only a little longer at 27m and displace 91 tonnes).



The LCMs will have a crew of 3; the LCMs are designed for beach landings and are fitted with a ballasting system to allow for safe operation when loading and unloading cargo. They also carry a kedge anchor, used to assist hauling the LCM back off the beach.

The Stern Ramp of the MRV has “marriage blocks” that allow the LCM to position itself forward or aft on the ramp and “Flippers” that ensure athwartships alignment. The stern of the LCM will be held in position with steadying lines running to the MRV port and starboard quarters. As can be seen in the photo the LCMs have a near-flat bottom that leads aft to a central fairing with no rudder, but with both azimuth thrusters on either quarter.

Propulsion is by two Azimuth Thrusters, powered by Scania D19 diesels of 235Kw (315hp) driving through z-drives. The LCMs are very maneuverable as the thrust can be directed in 360 degrees from the z-drive thrusters.

Last edited by Preceptor; August 21st, 2008 at 01:14 PM.
Padman is offline   Reply With Quote
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ADF Defence Update 2005 pepsi Geo-strategic Issues 19 March 16th, 2006 08:40 AM
Beslan School Raid (Fresh Update) Pathfinder-X Military Strategy and Tactics 26 October 19th, 2004 07:31 AM
F/A-22 IOT&E Update highsea Air Force & Aviation 5 October 17th, 2004 08:11 AM
RAAF JSF Update gf0012-aust Air Force & Aviation 6 June 22nd, 2004 04:47 AM
Peru Air Force to update Russian aircraft fleet ullu Air Force & Aviation 0 April 3rd, 2004 06:07 PM

Old May 16th, 2006   #2
Defense Aficionado
Lieutenant General
contedicavour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paris/Geneva (but I'm Italian)
Posts: 2,901
Threads:
Great extra capability for NZ' Navy. Still, what a shame a 3rd Anzac couldn't be funded... Any NZ deployment will most probably need some escort from the Australians.

cheers
contedicavour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2006   #3
Honorary Moderator / Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 903
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by contedicavour
Great extra capability for NZ' Navy. Still, what a shame a 3rd Anzac couldn't be funded... Any NZ deployment will most probably need some escort from the Australians.

cheers
Depends where the deployment is, within the South Pacific it will not need a Frigate, out side the SP and it will be a multinational deployment anyway.

Still a third, and dear I say a fourth! would be nice.

Something multifunctional like the Danish design or a scaled back LCS, from 2012-2015.

Dreams are free.
Whiskyjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17th, 2006   #4
Defense Aficionado
Major General
Sea Toby's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,472
Threads:
The Irish navy wants their government to purchase a MEKO 200 MRV, a 3,600 ton OPV with a vehicle deck instead of a hangar and helicopter deck. Its about half the size of the Danish MRV.

Other small navies are doing their homework on MRVs too. Norway, Belgium, and Portugal. Frankly, I like the New Zealand MRV the best, it has the best tactical sealift with the most vehicle deck space of any MRV. If the New Zealand MRV had a well dock, it might be considered a small LPD.

Here's a link to the Irish MRV:
http://www.irishmilitaryonline.com/b...ead.php?t=6905

While the New Zealand MRV can carry 40 LAVIIIs, a typical load would be 16 LAVs, 14 LOVs, 7 Unimogs, 2 ambulances, 2 flat bed trucks, 7 LOV trailers, 2 rough terrain fork lifts, and 4 four wheel drive vehicles, plus 33 containers, and 4 NH-90 helicopters stored below and 1 Seasprite helicopter in its hangar, along with 250 troops. The helicopter deck has two landing zones.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2006   #5
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 48
Threads:
The new OPVs have also got room for extra personnel aboard, mainly from civilian agencies. Could this not enable them to provide some support for spec force ops in the Islands, esp if had a 57mm installed to provide a bit more fire power.
Padman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2006   #6
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 48
Threads:
New Vessels named

Navy names seven new ships
The names and affiliated home ports of the Navy’s seven new Protector ships were announced by Defence Minister Phil Goff on Friday 31 March.

The Chief of Navy, Rear Admiral David Ledson said that the announcement of the ships’ names was another significant milestone in the delivery of 7 new ships under Project Protector. “The names that have been chosen for the new vessels illustrates not only the Navy heritage but the enduring links between the Navy and New Zealand. These are names that the Navy is very happy with and I’m sure the many ex-sailors who served on the original ships will feel exactly the same” he said.

The Navy’s Protector fleet will comprise of seven ships of three different classes; one Multi Role Vessel (MRV), two Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPV) and four Inshore Patrol Vessels (IPV).

All seven ships will be commissioned into operational service for the Royal New Zealand Navy at staged intervals during 2007 with the Multi Role Vessel scheduled for January and the last Inshore Patrol Vessel in December 2007.

MRV - CANTERBURY, Jan 07 (Christchurch/Canterbury)
OPV(1) - OTAGO, Apr 07 (Dunedin/Otago/Southland)
OPV(2) - WELLINGTON, Oct 07 (Wellington)
IPV(1) - ROTOITI, Jan 07 (Napier/Hawkes Bay)
IPV(2) - HAWEA, May 07 (Greymouth/Wesport/West Coast)
IPV(3) - PUKAKI, Sep 07 (Nelson/Marborough)
IPV(4) - TAUPO, Dec 07 (Whangerei/Northland)



Background on the Names
The Multi Role Vessel and two Offshore Patrol Vessels are named after Leander/ Otago Class frigates in commission in the Royal New Zealand Navy from 1966 until 2005. HMNZS CANTERBURY was the last to be decommissioned, on 31 March 2005, after 33 years operational service.

“The Navy has historically enjoyed a strong relationship with the Canterbury District, and we are pleased to be continuing this into the future with our Multi Role Vessel.” said the Chief of Navy. “We look forward to re-establishing connections with our capital city and further south in Dunedin, where regional visibility of the Navy has at times been limited.”

The Multi Role Vessel brings entirely new capabilities of military sealift and amphibious operations to the Royal New Zealand Navy. It will operate as an element of the Naval Support Force, around New Zealand and in the South East Asian region.

The two Offshore Patrol Vessels are designed as versatile vessels capable of multi-agency operations in support of national security tasks, with a secondary capability to operate in support of miscellaneous maritime operations.

The names chosen for the Inshore Patrol Vessels (IPVs) reflect two classes of earlier RNZN ships of the same names. They represent four of the six LOCH Class Frigates that fought in the Korean War between 1951 and 1953. The names were also used for the LAKE Class Patrol Craft that carried out 'resource protection' patrols around New Zealand in the 1970s and 1980s.
Image of Inshore Patrol Vessel at sea
The current IPVs are to fulfil a similar protection role, conducting EEZ patrols of New Zealand’s maritime borders, and working in a multi-agency environment to achieve government outputs.

The four names maintain a geographical balance – Taupo and Rotoiti being North Island lakes, Hawea and Pukaki being South Island lakes.

(Navy records state that while each Island has a Lake Rotoiti the original ROTOITI was named after the North Island lake.)


Regional Affiliation
Each ship is affiliated with a city and region of New Zealand in continuation of current naval practise. Ships traditionally develop a unique and close relationship with their ‘home port’. The locations of affiliated regions were chosen to ensure geographical balance of the Navy’s fleet throughout New Zealand.

Associations are developed between a ship and charities or organisations within their region. The ship may be issued a ‘Freedom of the City’ Charter which allows the officers and sailors onboard the “right and privilege, without further permission being obtained, of marching at all times with "drums beating, bands playing, colours flying, bayonets fixed and swords drawn.”
Padman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2006   #7
Banned Member
Major General
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,045
Threads:
Padman-

Please post links to your articles, they must be copyrighted, plus I want to see the pictures.
Big-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2006   #8
Defense Aficionado
Major General
Sea Toby's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,472
Threads:
Yes, the two OPVs have the capability to support 30 Special Forces each, carry their boats, and supply them with a sea container. Very handy indeed.

The OPVs can also be used to resupply offshore bases and island dependencies too. Currently New Zealand uses a frigate for such duties. Without any doubt these OPVs will be able to carry out duties locally which will free up the frigates for more important duties abroad.

Last edited by Sea Toby; May 18th, 2006 at 01:52 PM.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2006   #9
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 48
Threads:
Links for NZ Navy

Here is the link for the two articles posted www.navy.mil.nz
Padman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2006   #10
Defense Aficionado
Major General
Sea Toby's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,472
Threads:
While New Zealand has the capability to move one company of its army's forces, 250 men is enough to handle disaster relief operations, but overtaking an island country such as Fiji or Tonga or Samoa, this isn't enough men. Its simply not enough men. New Zealand would be looking for Australia to join any military operations in the South Pacific.

So why ask the question? New Zealand isn't powerful enough without the Australians, and neither will mount a military operation without the support of the rest of the Pacific forum nations.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2006   #11
Honorary Moderator / Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 903
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Toby
While New Zealand has the capability to move one company of its army's forces, 250 men is enough to handle disaster relief operations, but overtaking an island country such as Fiji or Tonga or Samoa, this isn't enough men. Its simply not enough men. New Zealand would be looking for Australia to join any military operations in the South Pacific.

So why ask the question? New Zealand isn't powerful enough without the Australians, and neither will mount a military operation without the support of the rest of the Pacific forum nations.
Interesting that NZ does not have enough lift to accomplish any mission in the South Pacific that may fall within the national interest.

As a country 5 x larger in population and many times more wealth than Fiji it is a sad state of affairs.

However I am not convinced that NZ could not seize and hold a port or airport if it made use of the mobility and fire power of the LAV, also the tactical lift for a light infantry company e.g. C-130s.

I have been a bit concerned for a number of years now that NZ does not take into account the South Pacific is an ocean into its defence planning.

two 12000-14000 ton LPDs would be much more applicable to NZ defence/emergency interests in the South Pacific than a air strike force. it is also an important niche contribution to UN/Coalition operations. Cost wise, spread over 5-7 years we are not talking a lot of money in terms of the defence budget.

The MRV is a useful ship, but alone it is not what NZ needs to conduct operations that fall within the national interest in the South Pacific region and wider world.

Fiji, Solomon’s and East Timor (where all of Australia’s sea lift assets are now concentrating). Not to mention Papua New Guinea.

Got to love a benign strategic environment like that!
Whiskyjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2006   #12
Banned Member
Major General
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,045
Threads:
Does one fully loaded Wasp LHD have more force projection than the entire NZDF?
Big-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2006   #13
Honorary Moderator / Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 903
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big-E
Does one fully loaded Wasp LHD have more force projection than the entire NZDF?
By a factor of 10 would be my best guess.

NZ can project 1 x reinforced infantry company and 4-5 helos.
Whiskyjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2006   #14
Banned Member
Major General
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,045
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiskyjack
By a factor of 10 would be my best guess.

NZ can project 1 x reinforced infantry company and 4-5 helos.
If they acquired the two LPDs as you suggest we would be talking about mutiple times the current capability. Is NZ ready to support such vessels?
Big-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2006   #15
Honorary Moderator / Defense Professional / Analyst
Major
No Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 903
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big-E
If they acquired the two LPDs as you suggest we would be talking about mutiple times the current capability. Is NZ ready to support such vessels?
Yes they could.

My above answer is based on the constraint of the lift not the force behind it.

It would mean building the army into a mix n match force. Eg a LPD could carry, 1 x Motorised/mech coy 1 x light coy 1 x recon and support forces.

IMHO, the NZDF and Govt need to think about using modern tech and fire power as a force multiplier in the South Pacific and wider world in conjunction with allies.

I am not talking about them arriving to morrow, but building a force and force structure in a 5 - 10 year plan.

What we have done is build a force structure that is primarily suited to UN peace deployments, instead of a force that is structured to regional needs with a secondary UN role.
Whiskyjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.