Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Navy & Maritime
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Ansat-U_taking_off_2.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off_1.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off.jpg

KAMAZ-65225.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates

This is a discussion on Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Originally Posted by KiwiRob Now if you were a sailor would you want to go to sea on a ship ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.
Old April 3rd, 2009   #1501
Super Moderator
Captain
MrConservative's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind a Desk
Posts: 682
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiwiRob View Post
Now if you were a sailor would you want to go to sea on a ship named after the ugliest women in two boots that NZ has ever had the misfortune to vote in as PM. I think we would have a mutiny.
That is a very good point Rob. Well done!
MrConservative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3rd, 2009   #1502
Defense Aficionado
Major General
Sea Toby's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,376
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrConservative View Post
For the history of this deal Toby I refer you to these concise articles though we are heading off topic.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_users_article14.html

and

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_users_article28.html

There were also reactivation costs of NZ$233m which the RNZAF were to pay as well as planned upgrades that were not part of the lease package that were to happen during the second 5 year lease period which LM would have benefitted from. Then a final a payment of NZ$287m at the end of the second lease period to purchase the aircraft outright.

This is outlined here -

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/css/docs/S...202000/C&C.pdf

It was going to be a win-win deal for all parties involved, RNZAF, LM, the US GAO, Pentagon, NZ Govt and White House however which way one slices and dices the figures.

Yes you are right. The cancellation was shameful and I can understand hurt feelings about it. I know a few good people whose careers were destroyed by it.

Lets get back to naval stuff.
I agree it was a very good deal. US dollars , New Zealand dollars. All I know is the US taxpayer is left holding the bag.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4th, 2009   #1503
Super Moderator
Lieutenant
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 509
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiwiRob View Post
Now if you were a sailor would you want to go to sea on a ship named after the ugliest women in two boots that NZ has ever had the misfortune to vote in as PM. I think we would have a mutiny.
I don't think mutiny is the way to go - I'd rather jump into the turning propellers than face a picture of Comarde Helen.


On another issue, what are the key issue facing the navy that the defence review has to deal with. My thoughts are...

1. The ANZAC upgrade and managing its cost.
2. How and what to we replace Manawanui, Endeavour with and
3. What maritime combat capabilities do we need in the post 9/11 world and an a factured Pacific.

I think for #1 the ANZAC upgrade will be limited to the bare basic's - ESSM, 2nd channel of fire and a limited sensor upgrade that deals with critical issues (i.e support for aging equipment etc). #2 has been addressed in part, previously on the board. I think 3 is going very tied to pacific / medium intensity operations, if it is addressed. I'm wondering if any one interested in a dumbed down ANZAC (No SPS-49, No ESSM but SeaRam and going back to the original plan to fit a 76mm)
Lucasnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4th, 2009   #1504
Aussie Digger
Guest
No Avatar
Posts: n/a
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucasnz View Post
I don't think mutiny is the way to go - I'd rather jump into the turning propellers than face a picture of Comarde Helen.


On another issue, what are the key issue facing the navy that the defence review has to deal with. My thoughts are...

1. The ANZAC upgrade and managing its cost.
2. How and what to we replace Manawanui, Endeavour with and
3. What maritime combat capabilities do we need in the post 9/11 world and an a factured Pacific.

I think for #1 the ANZAC upgrade will be limited to the bare basic's - ESSM, 2nd channel of fire and a limited sensor upgrade that deals with critical issues (i.e support for aging equipment etc). #2 has been addressed in part, previously on the board. I think 3 is going very tied to pacific / medium intensity operations, if it is addressed. I'm wondering if any one interested in a dumbed down ANZAC (No SPS-49, No ESSM but SeaRam and going back to the original plan to fit a 76mm)
It will be interesting to see whether RNZN is able to include this technology:

http://www.thalesgroup.com/australia...02&type=Market

into her ANZAC upgrade. On the surface, it seems like a relatively easy way to include the much needed "multiple channels of fire" capability...
  Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2009   #1505
Defense Aficionado
Major General
Sea Toby's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,376
Threads:
I don't see the logic for an ESSM quadpack upgrade without a multi-channel missile capability. If you are going to do the former you should also do the latter. What is bothering me the most is there is no program to replace out of date torpedoes. I would think that would be the first item on the agenda.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2009   #1506
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 754
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie Digger View Post
It will be interesting to see whether RNZN is able to include this technology:

http://www.thalesgroup.com/australia...02&type=Market

into her ANZAC upgrade. On the surface, it seems like a relatively easy way to include the much needed "multiple channels of fire" capability...
Fingers crossed (and it would be great for the RNZN ANZAC's to have a similar upgrade to the RAN ANZAC's)!

According to this recent news release, the RNZN ANZAC upgrade is priced out to be between NZ$287 and NZ$845 million for the two ships.

Unfortunately I suppose it all depends where the politicians draw the line i.e. bare bones upgrade versus something no doubt similar to the RAN's upgrade programme. Let's hope it's the latter, there's no point in the RNZN having ships that sitting ducks and not up to a full range of threat scenarios etc. Even the RNZAF's Skyhawks used to take out the ANZAC's regularly during exercises!
recce.k1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2009   #1507
Senior Member
Colonel
StevoJH's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 1,437
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by recce.k1 View Post
Fingers crossed (and it would be great for the RNZN ANZAC's to have a similar upgrade to the RAN ANZAC's)!

According to this recent news release, the RNZN ANZAC upgrade is priced out to be between NZ$287 and NZ$845 million for the two ships.

Unfortunately I suppose it all depends where the politicians draw the line i.e. bare bones upgrade versus something no doubt similar to the RAN's upgrade programme. Let's hope it's the latter, there's no point in the RNZN having ships that sitting ducks and not up to a full range of threat scenarios etc. Even the RNZAF's Skyhawks used to take out the ANZAC's regularly during exercises!
If they were getting the same upgrade as the RAN ANZAC's they would not be having their CWIS refurbished as the RAN ANZAC's no longer have the weight margin to operate a CWIS.
StevoJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2009   #1508
Super Moderator
Lieutenant
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 509
Threads:
HMNZS Rotoiti to be delivered

The New Zealand Herald is reporting that Rotoiti is to be delivered on Thursday 16 April and commissioned on the Friday. A few errors in the report, but at least they're starting to arrive. The OPV's are heading for mediation, with no confirmed delivery date. The full article is here.

I would still like to see them with a 25mm on the front.
Lucasnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2009   #1509
Defense Enthusiast
Master Sergeant
No Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 351
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevoJH View Post
If they were getting the same upgrade as the RAN ANZAC's they would not be having their CWIS refurbished as the RAN ANZAC's no longer have the weight margin to operate a CWIS.
The RNZN probably wouldn't operate Harpoon though-so there would still be room for a CIWS on board, unlike on RAN Anzacs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucasnz
The New Zealand Herald is reporting that Rotoiti is to be delivered on Thursday 16 April and commissioned on the Friday.
Excellent news.
ASFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2009   #1510
Deaf talker?
Major General
Todjaeger's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 2,466
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASFC View Post
The RNZN probably wouldn't operate Harpoon though-so there would still be room for a CIWS on board, unlike on RAN Anzacs.
Maybe yes, and maybe no...

The RAN Harpoon containers are immediately forward of the bridge, whilst the RNZN Phalanx is aft, above the hangar. Depending on how the weight distribution is laid out, there might still be an issue unless the weapon system is relocated and/or other equipment is re-arranged internally.

-Cheers
________________
"I'm doing the same thing I do every night, Pinky..." comment from one lab mouse to another.
Todjaeger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2009   #1511
Super Moderator
Lieutenant
No Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 509
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todjaeger View Post
Maybe yes, and maybe no...

The RAN Harpoon containers are immediately forward of the bridge, whilst the RNZN Phalanx is aft, above the hangar. Depending on how the weight distribution is laid out, there might still be an issue unless the weapon system is relocated and/or other equipment is re-arranged internally.

-Cheers
Its interesting to note that the Ministry of Defence website states that one of the issues being addressed for the RNZN ANZAC upgrade are "Stability management" issues. I don't think any upgrades the RNZN are going to do will be significant if they're already having to actively manage stability, in this manner. Good planning though and I wonder if they've learnt from RAN experiences.

Ah the advantages of a ship with a larger displacement.
Lucasnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2009   #1512
Defense Enthusiast
Master Sergeant
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 366
Threads:
Project Protector

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucasnz View Post
The New Zealand Herald is reporting that Rotoiti is to be delivered on Thursday 16 April and commissioned on the Friday. A few errors in the report, but at least they're starting to arrive. The OPV's are heading for mediation, with no confirmed delivery date. The full article is here.

I would still like to see them with a 25mm on the front.
Scoop have a much better article:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0904/S00117.htm

p.s. They sometimes remove stories so here it is in full...

Chief of Navy, Rear Admiral David Ledson says the upcoming delivery of the four new Inshore Patrol Vessels (IPVs) is an important and significant step for the Navy and the New Zealand Defence Force, as well as for the country.

The Minister of Defence announced earlier today that the four ships, ROTOITI, HAWERA, PUKAKI and TAUPO are soon to be delivered, beginning with ROTOITI, which will be officially handed over to the Navy on Friday 17th April in Whangarei before sailing to Devonport Naval Base on Friday 24th April. The ship will be affiliated to the port of Napier and the Hawke's Bay region, reflecting the special relationship with the Navy that stretches back to the 1931 earthquake.

“The delivery of these ships reflects a lot of hard work by the New Zealand Defence Force, in particular the Navy, and the Ministry of Defence,” Rear Admiral Ledson said.

“The IPVs will be very capable ships and they will provide increased opportunities for our Sailors, both in the Regular and Naval Volunteer Reserve Forces , to have new and exciting challenges and experiences. Importantly, too, they will enable the Navy to make a wider contribution both to New Zealand in our Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and further a field; particularly in the South Pacific.“ RADM Ledson said.

“Along with the new Offshore Patrol Vessels and the Air Force’s P3 Orion Maritime Surveillance Aircraft, they will provide a ‘step up’ in the Defence Force’s ability to work in close partnership with government agencies such as Department of Conservation, Ministry of Fisheries, Police, Customs and the Ministry of Foreign affairs and Trade to address New Zealand’s security challenges.”

"We're grateful to the contractor, BAE, for their contribution to the significant effort that has gone in to securing the delivery of these impressive new ships."

"Today is a very exciting day for the Navy,” Rear Admiral Ledson said.


ENDS


Background information on Project Protector IPVs

The Ministry of Defence and BAE Systems have agreed a formal delivery schedule for the Navy’s new Inshore Patrol Vessels (IPVs).

The ships are ROTOITI, HAWEA, PUKAKI and TAUPO. Prior to departure from Whangarei, they will be commissioned into naval service.

The ships are built to a modified Philippine Coast Guard “San Juan class” design. The Philippines Coast Guard currently operate 4 of this class and have been doing so since 2000.

The first IPV, ROTOITI, is planned to be delivered to Devonport Naval Base on 24th April, with the remaining three ships being delivered over the following six weeks.

The timetable for formal handover to the Navy and ceremonial commissioning of the new ships will be advised in due course.

The Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) are complete and have undergone sea trials, but the contractor has not yet offered them for delivery as there are still some issues to be resolved.

Narrative Ship Data
The IPVs are versatile vessels capable of multi-agency operations in support of national security tasks.
At 55 metres long and with a contracted 3000-nautical mile range (although the sea trials show that the range is likely to be in the region of 7000nm which is double the contracted requirement), they will contribute significantly to the patrolling of New Zealand’s 15,000km coastline, and our Exclusive Economic Zone out to 200 nautical miles. The primary role of the IPVs will be patrol and response to maritime security incidents within the inshore zone around New Zealand.

In addition to patrolling, an IPV’s tasks will include surveillance, response and boarding operations, and search and rescue. Secondary roles for the IPVs will be in New Zealand disaster relief and defence aid to the civil community.

The IPVs will have a complement of 20 naval personnel and four Government agency officers. They also have the capacity to host 12 additional personnel onboard for general naval training or other duties.

Additional Information
Compared with the Inshore Patrol Craft (1990s) and the Lake Class Patrol Boats (mid-70s to late 80s) the IPVs are like comparing a Ferrari with a Toyota Hilux. The IPVs are much faster (over the double the speed of the IPC) and highly manoeuvrable. With active fin stabilisers, they provide a comfortable ride, they are far more sophisticated (modern off the shelf equipment and automated systems including unmanned machinery spaces) and significantly more capable (long range, modern communications and surveillance systems) and they look smart!

The introduction of the IPVs will be an exciting time for the Royal New Zealand Navy. There would be many senior officers watching the young Commanding Officers with envy as the IPVs are significantly better than their predecessors.

The Navy has never had anything as capable and sophisticated as these ships which are specifically designed to undertake a range of tasks for several Government agencies including Customs, Ministry of Fisheries, DoC, Police, MFAT, NZDF and Maritime New Zealand.

Their introduction will enhance Navy's recruitment and retention as these ships frequent ports around the NZ coast.
Specification
Displacement 340 Tonnes
Length 55m
Beam 9.0 m
Draught 2.9 m
Speed 25 kts
Range 3000 nm @ 12 kts
2000 nm @ 16 kts
Main Engines 2x 2500 Kw
Stabilised Yes
Armament 3x.50 MG
Core Complement 20
Multi Agency Complement 4
Training Complement 12
Kennels 2
Boat Capacity 2 x 7.3 m Zodiac RHIB
Deployable by 2 x Powered Davits
Radars X band
Electro Optics Surveillance Yes
HF Radio 2
SATCOM Yes
Gibbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2009   #1513
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 177
Threads:
will be interesting to see if we finally get them on time, Im looking forward to having a look around on them! Im doing my conversion course for the IPV's in a few weeks so hopefully will get to serve aboard one soon!


good pic clip of CY in action!!

CY is current in IMAV so she will have a few more short comings rectified at the end of the maintenance period. Though after serving aboard her for 18 months, I must say that she is a capable ship regardless of what the media says!. Its amazing how much they get wrong.
mattyem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2009   #1514
Defense Aficionado
Major General
Sea Toby's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,376
Threads:
From the video slide show it appears she can load a company group and their equipment and discharge them over a suitable beach easily. Exactly what the New Zealand Defence Force required, to be able to sea lift a company of their troops abroad without a pier if necessary. And Canterbury can do so without much of a fuss either. Before her, the New Zealand Defence Force lacked this capability.

Last edited by Sea Toby; April 15th, 2009 at 11:54 AM.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2009   #1515
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 177
Threads:
Welcome to the RNZN's latest commissioned ship HMNZS ROTOITI, She will be alongside the wall in Philly next week. The crew will be proving all D.C. for M.O.E.T and when they get the tick in the box she will make way for Devo!
mattyem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.