Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Navy & Maritime
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Miramar_14_MV-22_1621a.JPG

Miramar_14_MV-22_1726a.JPG

Miramar_14_MV-22_0074a1.JPG

Miramar_14_FA-18C_0409a.JPG
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





India needs 3 more aircraft carriers: Navy chief

This is a discussion on India needs 3 more aircraft carriers: Navy chief within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Does it really? India needs 3 more aircraft carriers: Navy chief Ezhimala, Apr 07 - The Chief of Naval Staff, ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.
Old April 10th, 2003   #1
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 36
Threads:
India needs 3 more aircraft carriers: Navy chief

Does it really?

India needs 3 more aircraft carriers: Navy chief

Ezhimala, Apr 07 - The Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral Madhavendra Singh, said that India which at present had a lone aircraft carrier needed three more. Laying the foundation stone for a Rs 60 crore officers' married accommodation at the Ezhimala Naval Academy, Singh said the work on building an aircraft carrier at the Cochin shipyard at an estimated cost of Rs 3000 crore was progressing well.
Emphasising the need for an even more powerful naval force, he said Indian Navy required a fleet of submarines and destroyer ships in view of the growing threat perception. Besides, the government was holding negotiations with Russia to purchase a second hand aircraft carrier, he said.

To a question, he said India would continue its interactions with the United States on matters relating to the country's naval requirements.

Asserting that the Indian Navy was fully prepared to protect the country's maritime interests, the Naval Chief said the responsibilities of the naval forces was growing day by day.

"The government is fully conscious of the fact that the responsibilities of the navy is growing day by day and that is why it is sanctioning certain new naval projects," Singh said.

http://www.sunnt.com/news/regional/k...la.asp?id=7375
Mukesh Patel is offline   Reply With Quote
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Us Threatens To Block Israeli Aid If Phalcon Sale, to india proceeds. Psychosaint Air Force & Aviation 21 May 25th, 2011 03:15 AM
Russia helps China build new aircraft carrier yasin_khan Navy & Maritime 248 December 23rd, 2010 06:07 PM
Eurofighter to Saudi Arabia!! radiosilence Air Force & Aviation 39 January 9th, 2007 06:07 PM

Old April 10th, 2003   #2
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 111
Threads:
Wow i don't think they need that many.....3 is enough
________________
[url]www.raptorblog.com[/url]
Destroyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11th, 2003   #3
Defense Enthusiast
Lieutenant
ullu's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 516
Threads:
Yeah go ahead... waste your money.
ullu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11th, 2003   #4
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 36
Threads:
India is a regional power and for a power to be effective force it needs all the goodies it can get to apply that force! I say we get three more or two more!
Mukesh Patel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2003   #5
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 37
Threads:
BTW we could afford it especially when it costs 600 billion which is cheap for an ACC. That's about 1.8+.7 billion = 2.5 billion for 4 ACC, the .7 billion carrier is the Gorshkov that will be purchased from Russia.
Bharat_R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2003   #6
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 14
Threads:
sounds silly... what is india going to do with 4 a/cs? use them as shelters for the poor would be a nice idea.
2much4ya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2003   #7
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 37
Threads:
Poor, ha... Pakistan is more poor then India, I wouldn't be talking. If you're Chinese its a different story.
Bharat_R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2003   #8
Defense Enthusiast
Corporal
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 111
Threads:
It's a little different for both countries. In Pakistan the public is very rich while the goverment isn't up to par. In India the goverment is rich and not so smart with their riches as they continue to spent almost without thinking and not funding diseases prevention programs in India, which can help it improve the living stability of the country.
________________
[url]www.raptorblog.com[/url]
Destroyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12th, 2003   #9
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 37
Threads:
Here you go again, please we don't have to make up claims. Many Pakistanis live in India, ask them why? Because India's richer then Pakistan. Sure we got a 24% poverty rate, but is Pakistan's rate any better, its actually worse. BTW India spends 2.5% on defence, while Pakistan spends 4-6% of its GDP on defence.
Bharat_R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2003   #10
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 31
Threads:
Firstly, Bharat_R, i wouldnt belive everything u hear, especially from an indian government that wants to make the otherside look bad, i.e. we spend less on defence yet we are caperble.....

2.5% IS BULLS***, every1 knows that especially nowadays, after india has made its intentions clear to become a top military power in the region, u dont buy su-30, brahmos missiles and subs not to mention the rest of the stuff u love to buy, and keep a defence budjit so low, im amazed that any1 could belive that. Remember u r also competing against china, aswell as paks.

Secoundly, its all fine n dandy saying we want 3 more ACs, but these must be filled up with naval fighters (more spending), mainatance and repairs (more spending and not exactly indias fine side is it(MIG 21s)...), dont forget india does not really need them, coz paks is rite next door, and an attack would come instantly from both sides on that matter, however if ur getting them to deter the chinise....well think again, coz the chinise got a tomahwk criuse missile copy, and can luanch these from all fronts.
NARC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2003   #11
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3
Threads:
Quote:
Firstly, Bharat_R, i wouldnt belive everything u hear, especially from an indian government that wants to make the otherside look bad, i.e. we spend less on defence yet we are caperble.....
couldnt u say the same for pakistan?
wewe1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2003   #12
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 34
Threads:
Both countries spend too much while their people starve and remain uneducated. If India was just willing to compromise on Kashmir you could see some beautiful things happen between both countries for the benefit of both. The South Asian Connection would be kicking ass once again!
xtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16th, 2003   #13
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 16
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ullu
Yeah go ahead... waste your money.

What is the need for you guys to waste money on FC-1 and other stuff etc... Feed your poor instead... India is on the way to become economic power and you guys got a long way to go to to be able to stop begging...
Nucleas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16th, 2003   #14
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 34
Threads:
India a power? Oh please, they are just as bad as Pakistan. The only reason they are an economic powerhouse is because of the sheer amount of people they have. I'm sure if Pakistani couples made more babies it'd become an economic powerhouse in your terms. 40% of Indian's live below the poverty line.
xtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2003   #15
New Member
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 31
Threads:
My friends, i have an indian as a neighbour, i mean literally he is a sikh thou, and he keeps telling me that india is another iraq...lol, when i asked him to explain, he said well they want more and more power and they are doing very little for thier pple.

He says India has enough deterence against pakistan(which i agree too) yet they want more and more, this craving for more will eventually bring them down, is wat he says. I've mentioned the forum to him, and who knows u mite all hear from him your selfs.

I wonder why cant more indians be like him, espicially pple like Advani and those other hardliners.

And no, i dont agree that india is a powerhouse in economy, sure it is miles better then paks, but real economies dont let tyhier pple starve, look at the US or France.
NARC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.