Go Back   Defense Technology & Military Forum > Global Defense & Military > Navy & Maritime
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Ansat-U_taking_off_2.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off_1.jpg

Ansat-U_taking_off.jpg

KAMAZ-65225.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







Recent Photos - DefenceTalk Military Gallery





ICCALS catapult system concept

This is a discussion on ICCALS catapult system concept within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; Launch-Systems.com - Home The Navy will implement the EMALS on the new Ford-class carrier replacing the steam catapults used on ...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old January 18th, 2012   #1
Defense Enthusiast
Sergeant
No Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 259
Threads:
ICCALS catapult system concept

Launch-Systems.com - Home

The Navy will implement the EMALS on the new Ford-class carrier replacing the steam catapults used on previous CV/CVN platforms. EMALS offers the flexibility to dial-in the necessary force to launch heavier aircraft while providing reducing stress on aircraft, an advantage when launcching less robust UAVs.

Unfortunately, it does not appear that EMALS can be retrofitted to the legacy Nimitz fleet. These ships don't generate enough electricty required for EMALS operation.

The Navy had originally intended to develop and test a catapult launch system called the Internal Combustion Catapult Launch System (ICCALS) to compete with EMALS. ICCALS is claimed to offer all the advantages of EMALS and can be readily retrofitted to thr Nimitz CVNs. Essentially, it uses jet fuel in combination with an oxidizer to generate the energy neede to launch aircraft. A mere 25lbs. of JP-5 jet fuel with oxidizer will be sufficient to propel a 70,000lb aircraft at 170kts according to its proponents.

On the negative side of the ledger, I can see how storing large amounts of explosive oxidizer on a carrier which will be the primary target in any enemy attack would cause serious concern. Maybe some way could be devised to mitigate this risk.

Assuming the technology can be made to.work though, it would seem to offer a way to enhance the effectiveness of the Nimitz fleet. It could also make CATOBAR operations feasible on smaller, less expensive carriers.
colay is offline   Reply With Quote
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Us Threatens To Block Israeli Aid If Phalcon Sale, to india proceeds. Psychosaint Air Force & Aviation 22 May 25th, 2011 03:15 AM
Is the System of Systems Integration (SOSI) concept a myth? Regina_Daniels Army & Security Forces 7 July 8th, 2010 06:33 PM
Tele-Robotic Pointer System for Fire Control System. harrisonford Space & Defense Technology 0 November 1st, 2007 03:26 AM
World's Best Missile Defence Destroyer Army & Security Forces 20 January 29th, 2005 10:42 AM
P25 Trunked IP Communication System, Providing Secure Base Communications and NetworkFirst Interoperability ullu Army & Security Forces 0 September 23rd, 2003 12:58 PM

Old January 19th, 2012   #2
Super Moderator
General
swerve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 4,754
Threads:
This looks like a revival of an old idea, from before steam catapults, though they didn't use jet fuel, just powder charges. I think navies were quite relieved when steam catapults proved satisfactory.
swerve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #3
Just Hatched
Private
No Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
This looks like a revival of an old idea, from before steam catapults, though they didn't use jet fuel, just powder charges. I think navies were quite relieved when steam catapults proved satisfactory.
It is a old idea but brought up to date, from what i can find out is being considered again, with safer fuels jp5 and enriched air. It actually uses a steam catapult with the combustion unit producing the steam, the difference is its more controllable and more powerful.
tagger21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.