Go Back   DefenceTalk Forum - Military & Defense Forums > Global Defense & Military > Navy & Maritime
Forgot Password? Join Us! Its's free!

Defense News
Land, Air & Naval Forces






Military Photos
Latest Military Pictures

Yuma_17_HH-1_1552-1.jpg

Yuma_17_MV-22_2062-1.jpg

Yuma_17_AH-1Z_4406-1.jpg

Yuma_17_F-35B_4899-1.jpg
Defense Reports
Aerospace & Defence







German Navy

This is a discussion on German Navy within the Navy & Maritime forum, part of the Global Defense & Military category; catch all thread...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old February 14th, 2017   #1
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,585
Threads:
German Navy

catch all thread
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2017   #2
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,585
Threads:
op-ed from gcaptain

Germany to Buy Six MKS Multi-Role Warships - Ministry – gCaptain
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2017   #3
Grumpy Old Man
General
gf0012-aust's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,585
Threads:
and a brave move.... (from a governance and oversight perspective?)

Germany to Skip Tender for 1.5 Billion Euro Warship Purchase – gCaptain
________________
A corollary of Finagle's Law, similar to Occam's Razor, says:

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/gary-fairlie/1/28a/2a2
http://cofda.wordpress.com/

gf a.k.a. ROBOPIMP T5C
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2017   #4
Super Moderator
General
swerve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 6,472
Threads:
That adds up to six MKS-180 (F126?), four F125, three F124 & 10 K130/K131.
swerve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2017   #5
Defense Enthusiast
Captain
No Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 663
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by swerve View Post
That adds up to six MKS-180 (F126?), four F125, three F124 & 10 K130/K131.
Not to mention the 8 submarines they plan to have by 2030.. Quickly going from a respectable small navy to one decent sized tough one.
vonnoobie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #6
Defense Professional / Analyst
General
No Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,220
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
and a brave move.... (from a governance and oversight perspective?)

Germany to Skip Tender for 1.5 Billion Euro Warship Purchase – gCaptain
Then again how much better off would Australia be if we had done similar and simply ordered an evolved FFG-7 instead of the ANZACs, or a second batch of AWDs without mucking around with long procurements? The FFGs are cheaper to sustain than the ANZACs while delivering greater capability and reportedly greater survivability and I can't help but wonder if we went straight from Newcastle to an evolved but still very similar ship if they could have been bought for the same price or less than an ANZAC.

Same with F100 now, we are going for a build of three DDGs, to two OPVs after running down the workforce, then will move to what may be a version of the DDGs they just completed, would it not have been cheaper and more sensible to get the AWD Alliance to simply quote and a second batch of ships while the teaming, work force and supply chain were still in place. The government knows how much the first ships cost, they know how much cheaper the second repeat was, it's not rocket science to calculate a fair price for a new batch with specified upgrades, etc.
Volkodav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #7
Defense Professional / Analyst
General
Waylander's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein
Posts: 4,889
Threads:
It looks like the navy was nearly as surprised as the public with all the anouncements of additional ships. It's also interesting with the recent shift back to a focus on conventional warfare in the east. The navy plays second fiddle compared to the army and air force in such an event.

But they are happy to grab the chance. Manning will be difficult though.
Waylander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #8
Defense Professional / Analyst
Lieutenant General
kato's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,947
Threads:
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonnoobie View Post
Not to mention the 8 submarines they plan to have by 2030.. Quickly going from a respectable small navy to one decent sized tough one.
The additional 2 submarines are being fasttracked. They were originally announced for 2030 but will now be procured faster as part of a joint German-Norwegian submarine procurement contract.

If we want to be technical, the force multipliers are more important though. Three A702 AORs plus two A704 AOs (to be replaced around 2021, also new contract), six A404 multipurpose tenders and the three A423 surveillance ships (also up for a replacement contract that no one talks about yet). Plus the recently new rights to use the Dutch Karel Doorman JSS (which isn't just a "renting space" agreement - the navy is setting up a 70-man support unit for this) and the sealift ship flotilla set up with Denmark (including purpose-built Ark Germania and Ark Danica).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waylander View Post
The navy plays second fiddle compared to the army and air force in such an event.
And compared to CIR, the newest service of the Bundeswehr that is planned to have as many soldiers as the navy in five years. At least if it goes as currently envisioned.
kato is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.