Defence Talk Forum

Defence Talk Forum (http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/)
-   Navy & Maritime (http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/navy-maritime/)
-   -   Formidable Class Frigate (http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/navy-maritime/formidable-class-frigate-3422/)

tphuang January 2nd, 2007 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilo (Post 86271)
I wonder how stealthy these frigates really are. How do they compare to the la fayette class in terms of stealth?
Also i think these frigates wolud have been better with a gas-diesel-electric propulsion system like the British type 23s. They could move silently using the electric in conjunction with the towed array to guarantee the first shot against an enemy sub.

from the model I looked at on naval-technology, I would say Formidable actually looks more stealthy than La Fayette, but that's just my opinion.

Tiny January 6th, 2007 07:08 AM

just curious, does any one know the cost of one formidable class frigate?

Systems Adict January 6th, 2007 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pendekar (Post 36872)
[b]
Believe it or not, they only need 70 crew on board. that's quite a level of automation for a ship of it size. Look's like Malaysian Lekiu class frigates and Laksamana class Corvets have found their match.

I would have to agree with certain aspects of your statement. Yes, they are certainly more than a match to the Lekiu's & Laksamana's.

But it would be unfair to compare them, as the Formidable class Frigates are nearer the weight of a DDG (weighing in at more than 4,000 GRT). The Lekiu's are less than 2,500 GRT.

Additionally, technologically, because the Lekiu's have been in service since 1999, they will have "older" equipment.

That aside, IMO, I think you would find them pretty equal. The RMN is a well oiled, well drilled Navy, with a good fleet, and as said earlier, the fact that they have sonar & other systems that the Formidable's don't, it would be a hard fight to split them.

But that is just MY opinion......

Systems Adict

Red January 14th, 2007 07:33 AM

Quote:

would have to agree with certain aspects of your statement. Yes, they are certainly more than a match to the Lekiu's & Laksamana's.

But it would be unfair to compare them, as the Formidable class Frigates are nearer the weight of a DDG (weighing in at more than 4,000 GRT). The Lekiu's are less than 2,500 GRT.

Additionally, technologically, because the Lekiu's have been in service since 1999, they will have "older" equipment.

That aside, IMO, I think you would find them pretty equal. The RMN is a well oiled, well drilled Navy, with a good fleet, and as said earlier, the fact that they have sonar & other systems that the Formidable's don't, it would be a hard fight to split them.

But that is just MY opinion......
Urmm, the Formidable class does in fact has sonar. She uses an `Active Low Frequency Towed Array Sonar'. I agree that it is unfair to compare the larger Formidable class to the Lekius. They are hardly `equals.' The Lekiu frigates are good frigates for her size. Currently, no other ship in south east asian navies comes close to the Formidable in terms of capability, weaponry and sophistication of systems; Herakles phased array radar, Aster missile system, NGDS, etc. The incorporated stealth design also increases the deadliness.

The Laksamana class is a corvette and comparable to singapore`s Victory class corvette;

http://www.naval-technology.com/proj...ages/laks2.jpg
Laksamana class

http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/6...ory11omnv8.jpg
Victory class

Subangite January 19th, 2007 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 88245)
Currently, no other ship in south east asian navies comes close to the Formidable in terms of capability, weaponry and sophistication of systems; Herakles phased array radar, Aster missile system, NGDS, etc. The incorporated stealth design also increases the deadliness.

I agree. The Formidable class really is the envy of South East Asian navies. Also having 6 ships of this class IMHO makes the RSN the most "formidable" navy in ASEAN. hehe, :p: sorry for the pun.

Anyways tiny's question remains unanswered, how much are the Formidables costing the Singaporean tax payer? :unknown

contedicavour January 20th, 2007 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subangite (Post 89154)
I agree. The Formidable class really is the envy of South East Asian navies. Also having 6 ships of this class IMHO makes the RSN the most "formidable" navy in ASEAN. hehe, :p: sorry for the pun.

Anyways tiny's question remains unanswered, how much are the Formidables costing the Singaporean tax payer? :unknown

Probably around 300 mln USD each at current €/$ exchange rates.
A French FREMM (larger but with most weapons systems in common) costs 365 mln USD each.

I agree the Delta/Formidable FFGs are the most powerful ships south of China, east of India and north of Australia.

cheers

tphuang January 20th, 2007 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by contedicavour (Post 89237)
Probably around 300 mln USD each at current €/$ exchange rates.
A French FREMM (larger but with most weapons systems in common) costs 365 mln USD each.

I agree the Delta/Formidable FFGs are the most powerful ships south of China, east of India and north of Australia.

cheers

really?
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...gain/index.php
Quote:

The FREMM program calls for a total of 17 French frigates and 10 Italian frigates, at a total cost of about EUR 11 billion euros with equipment, weapons and initial support thrown in. Italy's share of the FREMM program is estimated at about EUR 4 billion over ten years, or EUR 400 million ($483.3 million) per vessel.
7 billion for 17 FREMM, 417 million Euro = 535 million USD

Red January 21st, 2007 08:51 AM

I think 1-2 billion USD with all the weaponry, technology transfers and systems. Newspaper reports mentioned 1 billion but I think it is just the empty ships minus weapons and systems.

I read a commentary by Janes 1-2 years ago on the Formidable and it was revealed that the Formidables can be easily upgraded in the future with newer systems. The 76mm gun, for example, can be replaced by a 127 mm one. The gun emplacement which is a squarish depression on the hull to preserve the stealth effect is built to accomodate the larger gun.

It has also been reported that the Slyver launchers will be upgraded to the
A70 vls launchers when the latter is ready sometime in the near futute or the A45 vls launchers. The Herakles radar can operate both Aster 15s and Aster30s.

I also read that the installation of illumuninators would allow the Herakles to guide the ESSMs and standard missiles. I have always preferred MK41s but I guess the cooperation with DCN makes it incumbent for us to buy Asters. The Asters are great missiles however; just that the missile load-out will be lesser(as compared to ESSMs and standards combined) though the formidable carries 32 Aster missiles. Maybe there will be a new block for Aster 15s which are smaller and can accomodate more missiles per silo. I think it is just the booster which needs to be miniturized. It would be the same size as the ESSMs otherwise.

Realistically, i doubt any SEA navy would need so many anti-air missiles currently. Im not sure about the future though.

contedicavour January 21st, 2007 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tphuang (Post 89267)
really?
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...gain/index.php

7 billion for 17 FREMM, 417 million Euro = 535 million USD

Sorry but your quoted article dates back to Oct 2005 ;) Back then we weren't even sure FREMM programme would survive after all !!
Since then unitary costs for Italian FREMM have been renegotiated at 320-350 mln euro (difference depends on Sylver A43 or A50) and 280 mln euro for French FREMM.
The rest of the cost is R&D for platform, weapons systems and sensors. I doubt such costs would be charged to international customers buying the shps off the shelf from France or Italy.

cheers

tphuang January 21st, 2007 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by contedicavour (Post 89438)
Sorry but your quoted article dates back to Oct 2005 ;) Back then we weren't even sure FREMM programme would survive after all !!
Since then unitary costs for Italian FREMM have been renegotiated at 320-350 mln euro (difference depends on Sylver A43 or A50) and 280 mln euro for French FREMM.
The rest of the cost is R&D for platform, weapons systems and sensors. I doubt such costs would be charged to international customers buying the shps off the shelf from France or Italy.

cheers

The cost of R&D should definitely be included in the unit price of these ships. Otherwise, F-22 would be 120 million per unit instead of 350 million. As for international customers, I really doubt that they would be charged any less. Normally, the domestic orders get the lowest pricing.

luv2surf January 21st, 2007 10:32 PM

"But it would be unfair to compare them, as the Formidable class Frigates are nearer the weight of a DDG (weighing in at more than 4,000 GRT). The Lekiu's are less than 2,500 GRT."

More than 4000 GRT ? Do you have a link for that figure?

Tasman January 22nd, 2007 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv2surf (Post 89482)
"But it would be unfair to compare them, as the Formidable class Frigates are nearer the weight of a DDG (weighing in at more than 4,000 GRT). The Lekiu's are less than 2,500 GRT."

More than 4000 GRT ? Do you have a link for that figure?

Hmmm... The link I looked at shows the full load displacement of the Singapore Formidables as 3,200 tonnes.

http://www.naval-technology.com/proj...ble/specs.html

The following link shows the Lekiu class as having a full load displacement of 2,270 tonnes, so the point made by Systems Addict that it is unfair to compare them is valid IMO:

http://www.naval-technology.com/proj...kiu/specs.html

Cheers

Red January 22nd, 2007 12:41 AM

Yeah.They`re 3200 tons each.

Red January 22nd, 2007 06:39 AM

Hey, I found this from the thales web-site on the Herakles;

Performance Data
• Two axis mono pulse phased array radar
• 60 rpm rotation
• 3D air domain: 250 km
• Surface domain: 80 km
• Track capacity > 500 air + surface
• Monopulse + dedicated tracking for all air targets
• Splash spotting function for fire control on floating targets
• Fully compatible with Aster 15/30 missiles.

http://www.thales-naval.com/naval/pdf/herakles1.pdf

contedicavour January 22nd, 2007 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 89505)
Hey, I found this from the thales web-site on the Herakles;

Performance Data
• Two axis mono pulse phased array radar
• 60 rpm rotation
• 3D air domain: 250 km
• Surface domain: 80 km
• Track capacity > 500 air + surface
• Monopulse + dedicated tracking for all air targets
• Splash spotting function for fire control on floating targets
• Fully compatible with Aster 15/30 missiles.

http://www.thales-naval.com/naval/pdf/herakles1.pdf

It's strange that the Herakles range has increased to 250 km.
Up to a few years ago it claimed 150km maximum, hence the compatibility issue with Aster 30 (range 120km).
Hmm Thales could have improved it of course, but I'm sceptical about such an improvement - may be the 250km refers to a big target such as a P3C ?

cheers


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright ©2003-2009 DefenceTalk.com. All Rights Reserved.